NOGGIN INHIBITS OSSIFICATION
499
TABLE 1. EFFECT OF NOGGIN IN PAIRED EXPERIMENTS (EXPERIMENT AND CONTROL SIDE IN THE SAME RAT; MEAN SD)
Experiment
Ng 1 g
Ng 10 g
Ng 10 g
Ng 10 g
IL-6R
Control
n
Tot c
Tot (e-c)
Bone c
Bone (e-c)
p (bone)
Vehicle
Vehicle
Vehicle
IL-6R
Vehicle
Vehicle
IL-6R
10
9
10
9
8
10
9
1.8 0.3
1.9 0.6
2.3 0.5
1.6 0.3
1.0 0.3
4.6 0.7
2.2 1.2
0.16 0.63
Ϫ0.30 0.88
Ϫ0.04 0.52
Ϫ0.19 0.44
0.06 0.28
0.03 0.87
0.14 1.1
1.0 0.2
0.7 0.6
1.5 0.6
0.8 0.3
0.6 0.3
1.3 0.46
1.6 1.0
Ϫ0.17 0.20
Ϫ0.24 0.64
Ϫ0.45 0.56
Ϫ0.32 0.33
0.06 0.39
0.03
0.29
0.03
0.02
0.66
0.03
0.97
a
wNg 2 g
Ng 10 g (7 weeks)
Ϫ0.37 0.44
0.01 0.88
Tot c, total tissue ingrowth distance in control; Tot (e-c), total tissue ingrowth distance in experiment side minus control; bone c, bone
ingrowth distance in control; bone (e-c), bone ingrowth distance in experiment side minus control; p (bone), p value for bone difference;
Ng, modified noggin (hNg⌬B2-Fc); wNg, wild-type noggin; IL-6R, hIL-6R␣-Fc.
a
This group was repeated (next line).
SD in italics.
All specimens were prepared for decalcified histology, cut- this tissue underwent membranous or metaplastic bone for-
ting them longitudinally, so that the ingrowth distance into mation. Because noggin is a highly specific BMP inhibi-
(2)
the chamber could be measured on histological slides by tor, our results therefore indicate that BMPs are necessary
computer-assisted morphometry. Three sections from each for membranous bone formation to occur, at least at a
specimen were measured and all were blinded and exam- normal rate.
ined in random order. The mean value from the three
The question then arises, if noggin effectively blocked
sections from each specimen was used for side comparison BMP activity, why was there any bone at all? We do not
using Students paired t-test.
RESULTS
know whether the noggin activity lasted for the entire ex-
perimental period or only for a part of it. Because there was
less bone with the noggin mutein at 4 weeks but not at 7
weeks, it appears that a single dose of noggin may not be
sufficient to counter the effects of endogenous BMPs over a
All groups with hNg⌬B2-Fc or wild-type noggin at 4
weeks showed decreased bone ingrowth (with one excep-
tion). This effect was seen regardless of dose and both in
comparison with buffer control and the IL-6R mutein (Table
7
-week time period. This may be caused by loss of noggin
from the chamber by a variety of mechanisms including
uptake and proteolysis or simple diffusion out of the cham-
ber or any combination thereof. The Fc chain on the noggin
molecule was of human origin, so it is possible that anti-
bodies formed and eliminated noggin activity during the
later part of the experiment. A less likely possibility would
be that a complete block of BMP signaling only leads to a
decreased rate of bone formation.
The IL-6R-Fc control shows that the hNg⌬B2-Fc did not
inhibit bone formation because of reactions to the human Fc
tag or by unspecific effects of the presence of microgram
amounts of recombinant protein, because if so, the IL-6R-Fc
should have inhibited bone formation as well. Further, such
unspecific effects probably should have an influence on the
total amount of ingrown tissue (bone and soft tissue) and the
histological appearance of the soft tissue, which was not
seen. The hNg⌬B2-Fc exhibits a prolonged half-life and
increased bioavailability on systemic administration and
was generated to enable treatment of certain conditions such
as fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (A.N. Economides,
X. Liu, F.H. Gannon, E.M. Shore, X. Wang, G. Elove, K.B.
Shriram, E.K. Fytros-Sirabian, J.P. Fandl, T.E. Ryan, K.M.
Bailey, F.S. Kaplan, R.B. Kimble, N. Stahl, unpublished
data, 2000). The effect of wild-type noggin in this experi-
ment shows that these modifications of the noggin molecule
were not needed in this model of local application.
1
; Fig. 2). At 7 weeks, there was no remaining effect. The
IL-6R-Fc showed no effect. The exception was the first
group with 10 g hNg⌬B2-Fc versus NaCl, which for
unknown reasons showed an abnormal variability in bone
ingrowth and a decrease that was not significant. This ex-
periment was repeated and then showed inhibition by
hNg⌬B2-Fc (Table 1).
In none of the groups was there a significant side differ-
ence in total tissue ingrowth. Thus, the amount of tissue that
had entered the chamber was not affected by noggin. The
only change was in the extent to which this tissue had
differentiated to bone. Vehicle controls differed signifi-
cantly between groups.
The scintigraphic activities of the 10-g hNg⌬B2-Fc
repeat group showed less technetium uptake on the noggin
side in all rats but one (p ϭ 0.002), indicating less bone
formation. The technetium activity correlated with the bone
2
ingrowth distance (r ϭ 0.74 and p ϭ 0.001, control side
data only, to avoid dependence).
Five rats were excluded because of infection or technical
problems. All exclusions were done before the histological
evaluation.
DISCUSSION
Bone ingrowth generally was low in all groups compared
with what usually is seen at 6 weeks in this model. This
(6)
Our data indicate that noggin did not inhibited tissue probably is caused by both the shorter observation time and
ingrowth in the chamber, but did inhibit the extent to which a disturbance of ingrowth by the collagen carrier, which was