in situ to minimize interference with the zeolite water band at
1635 cm21. In solution, the imine CNN stretch vibration of the
free ligand at 1631 cm21 shifts to 1610 cm21 upon complexa-
tion with MnIII.10b,11 A striking shift of the imine band to 1583
cm21 occurs upon complexation with MnII and oxidation to
form 1 in the EMT host which shows that a large majority of the
ligands is now coordinating the Mn ions.
activity increases significantly on addition of axial ligands such
as pyridine N-oxide, with which conversion of cis-
b-methylstyrene was 47%. Formally, 100% conversion corre-
sponds to a lower limit of 20 turnovers, but only a small fraction
of the intrazeolite salen complexes may be accessed by the
substrate during reaction. (ii) With PhIO as oxidant, 2–EMT
showed conversion of styrene and was more active than the
sterically more encumbered 1–EMT, suggesting that the access
of the bulky terminal oxidant was hindered in the zeolite–1
assembly (not in Table 1). (iii) The highest ee in epoxide, 88%
was achieved with cis-b-methylstyrene, 1–EMT plus pyridine
N-oxide as catalyst, and NaOCl as oxidant, in dichloroethane.
(iv) trans-b-Methylstyrene gives relatively high yields of trans-
epoxide but the ee is lower. (v) Smaller (non-prochiral) alkenes
such as 2,3-dimethylbut-2-ene give higher conversions than the
more bulky but more reactive aromatic alkenes, suggesting a
strong influence of the zeolite pore structure on diffusional
access to the active salen complex encapsulated in the zeolite
host. Proof for intrazeolite reactions is obtained by reacting
cholesterol with the encapsulated 1–EMT catalyst. While no
conversion was observed with the encapsulated catalyst after 18
h, in solution the epoxidation proceeded to 13% conversion
during the same time. This behaviour shows that the catalysis of
the smaller substrates truly proceeds in the zeolite pores.
Further proof that the asymmetric epoxidation reaction was
heterogeneous was obtained with a separation experiment
(oxidation of cis-b-methylstyrene with NaOCl and 1–EMT, in
acetonitrile). After removal of the catalyst, no further activity
was exhibited in the filtrate, while in the presence of catalyst the
reaction proceeds for > 30 h.
The encapsulated Mn salen complexes were studied as
asymmetric epoxidation catalysts using different substrates
(Table 1). In a representative reaction, 1 ml of dichloromethane
or acetonitrile, 1 ml NaOCl (5.25%, 0.70 mmol), 0.005 ml
Na2HPO4 (0.05 m), 0.005 ml n-decane (GC standard) and 1 drop
of 1 m NaOH were added to a solution containing 0.15 mmol of
an alkene such as cis-b-methylstyrene, along with 100 mg of
1–EMT catalyst. The slurry was stirred at 4 °C for 1 h, followed
by stirring at room temp. for !23 h. The ratio of Mn to alkene
was typically adjusted to 5 mol% (commonly used in homoge-
neous reactions). No conversion was observed when using an
MnII-exchanged, air-treated zeolite EMT without the chiral
salen ligand. The X-ray crystallinity of the zeolite host is
retained after assembly of the intrazeolite complexes, and only
slightly reduced after completion of the catalytic experiments.
The following observations can be noted (see also Table 1).
(i) 1–EMT with the bulky ligand is more active than 2–EMT
(e.g. conversion of cis-b-methylstyrene with 1–EMT was 15%
(after 24 h), and with 2–EMT it was only 1%. The catalytic
1.2
The authors gratefully acknowledge funding from the U.S.
Department of Energy for this work. We thank Professor Merritt
B. Andrus for assistance with chromatographic separations.
0.8
(c)
(b)
References
0.4
1 R. A. Sheldon and J. K. Kochi, Metal-Catalysed Oxidation of Organic
Compounds, Academic Press, New York, 1981; J. Gorzynski
Smith, Synthesis, 1984, 629.
2 Li. Deng and E. N. Jacobsen J. Org. Chem., 1992, 57, 4320; D. M.
Hodgson, P. J. Parsons and P. A. Stones, J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun., 1988, 217.
3 D. E. De Vos, J. L. Meinershagen and T. Bein, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl., 1996, 35, 2211; P. P. Knops Gerrits, D. E. De Vos, F. Thibault-
Starzyk and P. A. Jacobs, Nature, 1994, 369, 543.
(a)
0.0
250 350 450 550 650 750
λ / nm
Fig. 2 UV–VIS spectra (in diffuse reflectance mode) of oxidized 1 in
solution (a), 1–EMT (b) and 3–EMT containing MnII complexed by the
salen ligand of 1 (c)
4 (a) S. Feast, D. Bethell , P. C. B. Page, F. King, C. H. Rochester,
M. R. H. Siddiqui, D. J. Willock and G. J. Hutchings, J. Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun., 1995, 2409; (b) A. Corma, M. Iglesias, C. del Pino and
F. Sanchez, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1991, 1253; (c) A.
Carmona, A. Corma, M. Iglesias, A. San Jose and F. Sanchez,
J. Organomet. Chem., 1995, 492, 11; (d) A. Corma, M. Iglesias, V. M.
Martin and F. Sanchez, Tetrahedron Asymmetry, 1992, 3, 845; (e) U.
Bo¨hmer, K. Morgenschweis and W. Reschetilowski, Catal. Today,
1995, 24, 195; (f) A. Corma, A. Fuerte, M. Iglesias and F. Sanchez,
J. Mol. Catal. A, 1996, 107, 225.
5 W. Zhang, J. L. Loebach, S. R. Wilson and E. N. Jacobsen, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1990, 112, 2801; T. Katsuki, Coord. Chem. Rev., 1995, 140,
189 and references therein.
6 E. J. P. Feijen, K. De Vadder, M. H. Bosschaerts, J. L. Lievens, J. A.
Martens, P. J. Grobet and P. A. Jacobs, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1994, 116,
2950.
Table 1 Heterogeneous and homogeneous catalysis reactions of [Mn-
(salen)Cl] in EMTa
Epoxide
Substrate selectivity
Substrate
conv.(%) (%)
ee (%)
Confign.
Heterogeneous
Me2CNCMe2
PhC(H)NCH2
(E)-PhC(H)NCH(Me)
(Z)-PhC(H)NCH(Me)d
(Z)-PhC(H)NCH(Me)e
Cholesterol
40
15
29
15
47
None
75
87
62
67
58
—
NCc
34
20
80
88
NC
S-(2)
1S,2S-(2)
1S,2R-(2)
1S,2R-(2)
—
b
—
Homogeneous
PhC(H)NCH2
(Z)-PhC(H)NCH(Me)
Cholesterolf
55
85
13
95
97
85
35
80
—
S-(2)
1S,2R-(2)
—
7 S. L. Burkett and M. E. Davis, Microporous Mater., 1993, 1, 265.
8 J. L. Lievens, J. P. Verduijn, A.-J. Bons and W. J. Mortier, Zeolites,
1992, 12, 698.
9 N. Herron, Inorg. Chem., 1986, 25, 4714.
a
Salen
=
(S,S)-N,NA-bis(3-tert-butyl-5-methylsalicylidene)-
10 (a) M. T. Rispens, A. Meetsma and B. L. Feringa, Recl. Trav. Chim.
Pays-Bas, 1994, 113, 413; (b) J. Skarzewski, A. Gupta and A. Vogt,
J. Mol. Catal. A., 1995, 103, L63.
11 J. R. Dilworth, C. A. McAuliffe and B. J. Sayle, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton
Trans., 1977, 849.
cyclohexanediamine. (Other products and distribution not given.) Reagents
and conditions: 5 mol % catalyst, reaction maintained at 0 °C for 1 h then
room temp. for 24 h; solvent, CH2Cl2; oxidant, NaOCl; Astec chiraldex
B-TA column (decane: GC standard). b Reactivity of a non-prochiral alkene.
c Not chiral. d Initial experiments addressing the recyclability of the catalyst
after Soxhlet extraction with acetonitrile showed significantly lower ee; the
origin of this reduced enantioselectivity is currently being studied. e Catalyst
f
Received in Bloomington, IN, USA, 20th November 1996; Com.
6/07879F
with pyridine N-oxide (5 mol%); solvent dichloroethane. Isolated yield
determined by 1H NMR using CH2Br2 as internal standard (after 18 h).
902
Chem. Commun., 1997
Typeset and printed by Black Bear Press Lim ited, Cam bridge, England