4786
J. Lutz et al. / Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 689 (2004) 4783–4790
than 20% of the reducing equivalents provided to HbpA
by 1b were used for productive O2-activation, i.e.,
hydroxylation of 4a. In the case of NADH, 2b, this va-
lue was greater than 85%.
Therefore, we are suggesting that an increased inter-
action of 1b with FAD, resulted in hydrogen peroxide
formation, rather than in catechol product formation,
4b. Upon reaction with FAD alone, 1b was consumed
approximately 40 times faster than native NADH, 2b.
Therefore, we concluded that hydride transfer from
the reduced pyridine ring to the oxidized FAD alloxa-
zine moiety occurred more efficiently with 1b than with
2b.
The dramatically increased rate of 1b oxidation in
comparison to 2b may be explained by steric, electronic,
and conformational effects that facilitate a hydride
transfer between 1b and FAD. Further investigations
to clarify this mechanistic point will be accomplished
in the future. Based on these results, the interesting
dependency of HbpA activity and the concentration of
1b may be explained by two opposing effects. Firstly,
the formation of reduced FAD at the active site was rate
limiting in the catalytic mechanism of HbpA. Thus,
according to the Michaelis–Menten model, increasing
the concentration of 1b should have increased the rate
of the hydroxylation reaction. Moreover, the increased
rate of formation of FADH2 also supports the nonpro-
ductive generation of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). We
suggest that catalytically relevant residues of HbpA,
e.g., cysteine SH groups, at the active site of HbpA, were
directly affected by in situ generated H2O2.
reactivity of FDH compared to HbpA might be ex-
plained by the different enzymatic mechanisms of the
FDH reaction for the regeneration of 1b by formate.
For example, Labrou and co-workers described
Lys360 to be involved in molecular recognition of 2a
via the ribose ring [13]. FDH brings 2a and formate in
close proximity via specific non-covalent binding of both
substrates, which stabilizes the transition state. Thus,
the reaction of formate and 2a was found to be acceler-
ated by several orders of magnitude by FDH. In the case
of HbpA, as shown above, the chemical regeneration of
FADH2, which is the reactive species for the monooxyg-
enase enzyme, proceeds very rapidly even in the absence
of enzyme. Therefore, in the case of 1b, HbpA was not
necessary for the reductive half reaction, i.e., the transfer
of hydride to FAD.
The active site of HbpA controls the regiospecific
hydroxylation reaction of the substrate via its proximity
to the FADH hydroperoxide. Recently, Lo and Fish [8]
proposed a possible role for the zinc metal ion center at
the active site of HLADH, which was thought to facili-
tate the stereospecific hydride transfer from 1b to the
achiral ketone substrate for chiral alcohol synthesis.
Moreover, in contrast to HLADH, FDH possesses no
metal centers to which 1a might bind, and therefore,
be in position in proximity to the formate ion to form
1b. More importantly, the formate driven regeneration
of reduced nicotinamide models, 1a–1b or 2a–2b, has
been reported to be catalyzed by the organorhodium hy-
dride, [Cp*Rh(bpy)(H)]+ [14], with catalytic activities in
the range of 11 hꢀ1 being observed (Fig. 5).
Apparently, the use of 1b as a reductant does not
yield the high correlation between consumption of
reducing equivalents and substrate hydroxylation that
was observed with natural NADH, 2a [11]. One plausi-
ble approach to rationalising these results assumes that
the NADH backbone, presumably via multiple H-bond
and other non-covalent interactions, induces major
structural changes of the active site geometry, which
positions the phenolic substrate in close proximity to
the activated 4a-hydroperoxoflavin, thereby minimizing
undesired side reactions [12]. Since 1b lacks the back-
bone of NADH, none of the aforementioned effects pre-
sumably occurs, and the 4a-hydroperoxoflavin becomes
susceptible to hydrolysis to H2O2 in competition with
ortho hydroxylation of substrate. Further experiments
are currently underway to establish this hypothesis.
We next envisioned in situ regeneration of the biomi-
metic co-factor, 1b, using [Cp*Rh(bpy)(H2O)](Cl)2 as
the precatalyst, with formate as the hydrogen source,
to form 1b from 1a [14a]. The usual reduction procedure
used by enzymologists entails the role of formate dehy-
drogenase (FDH) to regenerate native NADH, 2b.
However, even after several hours in the presence of
1 mM 1a, no formation of 1b was detectable, with
FDH as the reducing catalyst. This apparent lack of
Thus, we decided to couple the 1b regeneration as
shown in Fig. 5 with the HbpA catalyzed hydroxylation
of 2-hydroxybiphenyl. We found only small amounts of
product (in the lM range) when combining biomimetic
co-factor regeneration with the enzymatic hydroxylation
reaction. Further analysis revealed that this lack of cate-
chol product could be explained by the loss of activity of
both the organorhodium precatalyst, [Cp*Rh(bpy)-
(H2O)](Cl)2, and the HbpA monooxygenase enzyme un-
der the reaction conditions. Since the general reaction
conditions show that each catalytic species was compar-
atively stable [15,16], we propose an inhibitory interac-
tion between both reactants. In fact, we observed a
deactivation of HbpA in the presence of the precatalyst
[Cp*Rh(bpy)(H2O)](Cl)2, accompanied by the forma-
tion of a yellow precipitate (Table 1).
As shown in Table 1, the extent of decreasing HbpA
activity depended on both the HbpA and the
[Cp*Rh(bpy)(H2O)](Cl)2 concentrations, and suggested
a stoichiometric interaction of both components causing
this inhibition reaction. In a similar situation to the inhi-
bition of HbpA, the [Cp*Rh(bpy)(H2O)](Cl)2 activity
for the reduction of N-benzylnicotinamide bromide,
1a, in the presence of formate ion, was also decreased.
Therefore, we suggest that the potential nucleophilic