SCHEME 1
and the transition metal-Lewis acid dual character of
the vanadium catalysts21,23 might be invoked as a plau-
sible explanation.
The hydride migration is an extremely fast process: in
fact no trace of the intermediate epoxide was detected
when the reaction was carried out on 1a at -20 °C after
a short reaction time (30 min), but only the presence of
10% of ketone 2a and unreacted starting phenol was
observed in the reaction mixture.24 In the case of trisub-
stituted epoxides 3f,g steric factors might prevent alkyl
or aryl migration.25 In the case of olefin 1h the final
rearranged product would be an aldehyde, which could
suffer VO(acac)2-catalyzed aldol condensation affording
side products.26
The coordination of the phenolic OH to the metal
catalyst accelerates the epoxidation of o-alkenyl phenols
and the following rearrangement of the chelated epoxides
intermediates could then be facilitated. It has to be noted
that the VO(acac)2/TBHP-mediated oxidation of o-alkenyl
phenols to o-hydroxybenzyl ketones is analogous to the
Wacker oxidation27 of vinylarenes to form carbonyl
compounds in a single step, but with the advantage of
being highly regioselective.
Ketones 2 are immediate synthetic precursors of benzo-
[b]furans, which are important natural structural units28
having interesting and several biological activities.29 We
therefore turned our attention to the possibility of
developing an easy one-pot methodology based on the
VO(acac)2/TBHP system as a suitable alternative proto-
col30 for the synthesis of benzo[b]furans.
On the grounds of literature reports,15 BF3‚(Et2O) was
initially chosen as the acid catalyst to perform the
intramolecular hemiketalization and dehydration of o-
hydroxybenzyl ketones to benzo[b]furans (Table 4, entries
1-3). The acid (0.5 equiv) was added to the reaction
mixture after the complete formation of intermediates 2
substituted compound 1e, an acceptable yield of the
ketone was attained (entry 5). The electron-rich trisub-
stituted C-C double bond compounds 1f,g were re-
acted under more controlled conditions and in this case
the epoxides 3f,g were isolated in very good yields
(entries 6 and 7). Additional experiments were carried
out on 1f,g. After the generation of the epoxides 3f,g
at -20 °C, the reaction mixture was slowly warmed to
room temperature and 1H NMR analysis showed the
presence of mixtures of unidentified products,20 while no
evidence of the formation of compounds of type 2 was
detected. In the last entry, the terminal olefin 1h reacted
slowly at room temperature, affording a complex reaction
mixture.
A reasonable mechanistic hypothesis to justify the
results obtained in the oxidation of o-alkenyl phenols
takes into account the transition metal-Lewis acid dual
character21 of the VO(acac)2 complex. First, the chelation
of the phenolic OH to the vanadium complex is essential
for the rate enhancement in the epoxidation of 1 accord-
ing to what is reported for the allylic alcohols.3 In fact,
when the reaction was performed on acetylated 1i, after
7 h the epoxide 3i was isolated in only 37% yield (Scheme
1).
Second, VO(acac)2 plays the role of Lewis acid, promot-
ing the rearrangement of the intermediate epoxides of
compounds 1a -e to ketones via selective benzylic C-O
cleavage, and 1,2 hydride migration affording a single
carbonyl compound. There have been a number of reports
on Lewis acid-catalyzed rearrangements of epoxides to
carbonyl compounds in the literature,22 but only a few
are catalytic and regioselective in nature. The constitu-
tion of the rearranged product is determined by the Lewis
acid used and the migratory aptitude of the epoxide
substituents. Interestingly, among them, VO(OR)Cl2
catalysts have been employed in the highly regioselective
rearrangement of epoxides to carbonyl compounds.23 In
this case, a greater and very fast migratory aptitude of
hydrogen compared to aryl and alkyl substituents has
been observed, a result that is in agreement with our
observations. This behavior is different with respect to
most of the Lewis acids reported for this transformation
(24) Another experiment was carried out to exclude that residual
acidity of silica gel, used in the workup, could be responsible for the
intermediate epoxide rearrangement to ketone. Compound 1a was
reacted with VO(acac)2/TBHP system, under argon atmosphere, at 0
°C in CDCl3 for 2.5 h. Then, the reaction mixture was directly analyzed
in an NMR tube and only ketone 2a (40%) and unreacted 1a were
detected.
(25) Steric factors in the Lewis acid complexed epoxide can be
involved preventing or favoring the alkyl or aryl migration.22c
(26) It has been previously reported that some acid-catalyzed
rearrangements of epoxides furnished very complex reaction mixtures,
whose separation afforded phenylacetaldehyde derivatives in low
yields.22d,g,h
(27) Keinan, E.; Seth, K. K.; Lamed, R. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1986,
108, 3474.
(28) Donnelly, D. M. X.; Meegan, M. J . In Comprehensive Hetero-
cyclic Chemistry; Katritzky, A. R., Rees, C. W., Eds.; Pergamon:
Oxford, UK, 1984; Vol. 4, p 657.
(29) (a) Cagniant, P.; Cagniant, D. Adv. Heterocycl. Chem. 1975, 18,
343. (b) Kiyama, R.; Homna, T.; Hayashi, K.; Ogawa, M.; Hara, M.;
Fujimoto, M.; Fujishita, T. J . Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 2728. (c) Felder,
C. C.; J oyce, K. E.; Briley, E. M.; Glass, M.; Mackie, K. P.; Fahey, K.
J .; Cullinan, G. J .; Hunden, D. C.; J ohnson, D. W.; Chaney, M. O.;
Koppel, G. A.; Brownstein, M. J . Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1998, 284,
291. (d) Wyatt, P. G.; Allen, M. J .; Chilcott, J .; Foster, A.; Livermore,
D. G.; Mordaunt, J . E.; Scicinski, J .; Woollard, P. M. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 2002, 12, 1399.
(30) (a) Brady, W. T.; Giang, Y. F. J . Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 2145. (b)
Banerjee, A.; Nayak, S. K. J . Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1990, 150.
(c) Zubia`, E.; Luis, F. R.; Massanet, G. M.; Collado, I. G. Tetrahedron
1992, 48, 4239. (d) Hosokawa, T.; Ohkata, H.; Moritani, I. Bull. Chem.
Soc. J pn. 1975, 48, 1533. (e) Satoh, M.; Miyaura, N.; Suzuki, A.
Synthesis 1987, 373. (f) Kundu, N. G.; Pal, M.; Mahanty, J . S.; De, M.
J . Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1997, 2815. (g) Arcadi, A.; Cacchi, S.;
Giuseppe, S. D.; Fabrizi, G.; Marinelli, F. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 2409.
(20) The unidentified compounds obtained at the end of the reactions
presumably derived by the phenolic OH intra- and intermolecular
epoxide ring-opening.
(21) Bosnich, B. Aldrichim. Acta 1998, 31, 76.
(22) (a) House, H. O. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1955, 77, 3070. (b) Rickborn,
B.; Gerkin, R. M. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1971, 93, 1693. (c) Maruoka, K.;
Murase, N.; Bureau, R.; Ooi, T.; Yamamoto, H. Tetrahedron 1994, 50,
3663. (d) Sudha, R.; Malola Narasimhan, K. M.; Geetha Saraswathy,
V.; Sankararaman, S. J . Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 1877. (e) Kulasegaram,
S.; Kulawiec, R. J . J . Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 6547. (f) Ranu, B. C.; J ana,
U. J . Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 8212. (g) Anderson, A. M.; Blazek, J . M.;
Garg, P.; Payne, B. J .; Mohan, R. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 1527.
(h) Bhatia, K. A.; Eash, K. J .; Leonard, N. M.; Oswald, M. C.; Mohan,
R. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 8129.
(23) Mart´ınez, F.; del Campo, C.; Llama, E. F. J . Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 2000, 1749.
J . Org. Chem, Vol. 68, No. 9, 2003 3693