H. Li, Y. Liu, X. Li et al.
Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy 246 (2021) 119059
3. Results and discussion
1
1
1
1
2
.39 (s, 12H). 13C NMR δ (75 MHz, Methanol-d
):182.9, 182.6,
4
62.8152.2, 147.4, 139.3, 138.8, 137.9, 136.6, 135.0, 134.5, 134.1,
34.0, 131.5, 131.4, 130.0, 128.8, 128.3, 128.3, 127.6, 127.4, 127.3,
27.2, 124.0, 122.9, 114.2, 113.7, 112.3, 110.8, 84.0, 54.3, 43.1, 42.8,
5.2, 25.2, 23.9, 23.6, 13.2, 13.0. HR-ESI-MS: m/z calcd for CBRV
3.1. Spectroscopic response of CBRV to ROS
The spectroscopic properties of CBRV are shown in Fig. 1 and
Table S1. From the absorption and fluorescence spectra of CBRV before
2
+
2+
(
55 2 3
C H59BN O , [M] ); 403.230846, found, 403.230902.
−
−
and after reaction with OCl or ONOO , it is seen that CBRV exhibits a
strong absorption at 460 nm (Fig. 1A) and nearly no fluorescence
2.3. Preparation of ROS
(
Fig. 1B). The reaction of CBRV with ROS produced a new absorption
peak at 590 nm and a strong fluorescence emission at 710 nm, similar
to that of the corresponding reaction product CRV. This supports the oc-
currence of the oxidative reaction, and the product CRV was further
confirmed by mass spectral analyses (Fig. S4).
The effects of pH and reaction time on the reaction system were ex-
plored (Fig. S5A), revealing that CBRV functions well in the range of
pH 6.0–9.0. On the other hand, the fluorescence increase of the reaction
solution reached the maximum within 1 min (Fig. S5B). Thus, 5 min of
the reaction time may be selected for this study.
As mentioned above, the preparation and concentration determina-
tion of ROS were made following the methods reported in literature
32–34,37,38], in which •OH was generated from the Fenton reaction
[
2+
2 2
of Fe (10 μM) and H O (100 μM).
2
.4. General procedure for spectral measurements of ROS and viscosity
CBRV was dissolved in methanol to prepare its stock solution of
mM. Unless otherwise noted, all the spectral measurements were per-
Under the optimized conditions (reaction at pH 7.4 for 5 min), the
1
−
−
linear relationship between CBRV and OCl /ONOO concentration
was investigated. As shown in Fig. 2A and C, the fluorescence intensity
formed in 20 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) according to the following
procedure. A 3 mL of 20 mM phosphate buffer was added to a test tube,
followed by addition of 30 μL CBRV stock solution (1 mM) and appropri-
−
−
increases with increasing OCl or ONOO , and it is found that the fluo-
−
−
rescence enhancement is directly proportional to the concentration of
ate volume of reactant (OCl , ONOO or other ROS and bioactive spe-
cies) solution. After incubation with shaking at room temperature for
−
−
−
OCl and ONOO in the range of 2–10 μM OCl and 2–16 μM
−
2
ONOO , with a linear equation of ΔF = 44.09 × C (μM) + 118 (R =
.99) and ΔF = 37.80 × C (μM) + 4.4 × 10
5
min, the absorption and fluorescence spectra were measured.
To test the effect of viscosity, 50 μL of the stock solution of CBRV was
−10
2
0
93 (R = 0.98), respec-
tively, where ΔF is the difference of fluorescence intensity of CBRV in
mixed with 5 mL of the methanol/glycerol mixture at different volume
proportions in a test tube. The resulting solutions were shaken for 3 h
and then cooled to room temperature. Afterwards, the absorption and
fluorescence spectra of these solutions were measured at room temper-
ature (25 °C).
−
−
the presence and absence of OCl or ONOO . The detection limits
3S/m, in which S is the standard deviation of blank measurements,
(
n = 11, and m is the slope of the linear equation) are determined to
be 128.8 nM and 150.2 nM, respectively.
Next, the selectivity of CBRV was studied for OCl−/ONOO− over
−
other potential ROS, including H
2
O
2
, •OH, NO, O
2
• , TBHP and TBO•. As
−
2
.5. Cytotoxicity assay
shown in Fig. S6, CBRV shows high selectivity to OCl or ONOO− over
other ROS, except that H exhibits a moderate fluorescence response
at higher concentrations, which, however, is a much slower reaction
and lower intensity compared with that of OCl or ONOO under the
same optimal conditions (Fig. S5B). It is also noted that H and •OH
2 2
O
The cytotoxicity of CBRV to HeLa cells was examined by standard
MTT assay [39].
−
−
2 2
O
produced similar signals (Fig. S6), which may be due to that the Fenton
reaction is relatively slow under these conditions, and CBRV was mostly
2.6. Cell culture
2 2
oxidized by H O . Moreover, the response of CBRV to inorganic salts and
RAW 264.7 cells (or HeLa cells) were cultured in RPMI 1640 media
other bioactive substances, such as amino acids, and glucose, were also
examined. As depicted in Fig. S7, the fluorescence of CBRV does not
change significantly with the addition of these species. The above
results.
(
DMEM) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated new-born calf
serum (fetal calf serum, FBS) in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air
and 5% CO at 37 °C.
2
indicated that CBRV showed relatively high selectivity for OCl−/
−
ONOO , which may be ascribed to the specific oxidation of CBRV by
2
.7. Imaging endogenous ROS in cells
−
−
OCl /ONOO . In order to further investigate the selectivity of CBRV,
the fluorescence of the oxidative product CRV was also examined in
the presence of different ROS, inorganic salts and other bioactive sub-
stances. The results in Figs. S8 and S9 indicated that these interferences
hardly caused fluorescence changes of CRV.
Cells (HeLa or RAW 264.7) were planted in glass bottom dishes,
grown for 24 h and then treated with the stimulator (PMA or LPS/IFN-
γ) for appropriate time. After that the cells were washed and incubated
with 10 μM CBRV for 30 min, and fluorescence imaging was conducted
with a 635 nm excitation source and emissions were collected from 670
to 750 nm. For elimination of ROS, HeLa cells were pretreated with PMA
10 nM) for 6 h, and RAW 264.7 cells were pretreated with LPS
1 μg/mL)/IFN-γ (100 ng/mL) for 15 h; then they were incubated for
h in the presence of NAC (1 mM), and finally washed by serum-free
media and loaded with CBRV for 30 min before imaging.
Further, the cytotoxicity of CBRV toward HeLa cells was studied by
the MTT assay to test whether CBRV can be used for intracellular imag-
ing. As shown in Fig. S10, CBRV at a high concentration of no more than
(
(
1
1
0 μM does not significantly damage the live cells, implying an excellent
biocompatibility of CBRV. Furthermore, the fluorescence confocal imag-
ing results (Fig. S11) suggested that CRV had good cellular permeability.
3.2. Response of CBRV to viscosity
2.8. Imaging endogenous viscosity in HeLa cells
Next, a series of tests on the fluorescence response of CBRV to differ-
HeLa cells were planted in glass bottom dishes, grown for 24 h and
then treated with apoptotic agent (etoposide) for appropriate time.
After that the cells were washed and incubated with 10 μM CBRV for
0 min for fluorescence imaging.
ent viscosities were made by mixing methanol/glycerol at different pro-
portions. From Fig. 3A, it is seen that the emission maximum is at about
571 nm, and as the viscosity gradually increases from 0.59 cP (in pure
methanol) to 945.35 cP (in pure glycerol) [22], the fluorescence is
3
3