R.L. Frost et al. / Thermochimica Acta 407 (2003) 1–9
9
to the SO4 symmetric and antisymmetric stretching
vibrations. Secondly, a complex band profile is cen-
tred on 1446 cm−1 ascribed to the CO3 antisymmetric
stretching vibrations. Thirdly, the bands observed at
1614 and 1654 cm−1 are assigned to the water bend-
ing modes. In the IE spectrum at 200 ◦C, bands are
observed at 1030, 1096 and 1159 cm−1. These bands
are assigned to the SO4 antisymmetric stretching
modes. The broad profile at 1441 cm−1 is attributed
to the antisymmetric CO3 stretching modes. What
is noted is the absence of any HOH bending modes.
At this temperature no water is observed in the IE
spectra. The spectrum at 600 ◦C shows the absence
of both water and carbon dioxide. At this tempera-
ture the SO4 spectra become less complex. Only two
bands are observed at 972 and 1121 cm−1 assigned
to the SO4 symmetric and antisymmetric stretching
modes. The reason why the spectra have become sim-
ple is due to the lack of either water or OH units with
which the sulphate could hydrogen bond.
hydroxyls and the carbonate is lost. The sulphate is
lost at significantly higher temperatures.
References
[1] J.T. Kloprogge, R.L. Frost, Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 184 (1999)
61.
[2] A. Alejandre, F. Medina, X. Rodriguez, P. Salagre, Y.
Cesteros, J.E. Sueiras, Appl. Catal. B 30 (2001) 195.
[3] J. Das, K. Parida, React. Kinet. Catal. Lett. 69 (2000) 223.
[4] S.H. Patel, M. Xanthos, J. Grenci, P.B. Klepak, J. Vinyl Addit.
Technol. 1 (1995) 201.
[5] V. Rives, F.M. Labajos, R. Trujillano, E. Romeo, C. Royo,
A. Monzon, Appl. Clay Sci. 13 (1998) 363.
[6] F. Rey, V. Fornes, J.M. Rojo, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans.
88 (1992) 2233.
[7] M. Valcheva-Traykova, N. Davidova, A. Weiss, J. Mater. Sci.
28 (1993) 2157.
[8] C.O. Oriakhi, I.V. Farr, M.M. Lerner, Clays Clay Miner. 45
(1997) 194.
[9] G. Lichti, J. Mulcahy, Chem. Aust. 65 (1998) 10.
[10] Y. Seida, Y. Nakano, J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 34 (2001) 906.
[11] Y. Roh, S.Y. Lee, M.P. Elless, J.E. Foss, Clays Clay Miner.
48 (2000) 266.
[12] Y. Seida, Y. Nakano, Y. Nakamura, Water Res. 35 (2001)
2341.
[13] M.A. Aramendia, V. Borau, C. Jimenez, J.M. Marinas, J.M.
Luque, J.R. Ruiz, F.J. Urbano, Mater. Lett. 43 (2000) 118.
[14] V.R.L. Constantino, T.J. Pinnavaia, Inorg. Chem. 34 (1995)
883.
4. Conclusions
The HRTGA of the two related minerals carrboy-
dite and hydrohonessite have been studied. These hy-
drotalcite minerals show at least five weight loss steps
ascribed to (a) water desorption, (b) dehydration, (c)
dehydroxylation, (d) de-carbonate-ing (hydrohones-
site), and (e) de-sulphating.
[15] M. Del Arco, P. Malet, R. Trujillano, V. Rives, Chem. Mater.
11 (1999) 624.
[16] K. Hashi, S. Kikkawa, M. Koizumi, Clays Clay Miner. 31
(1983) 152.
[17] L. Ingram, H.F.W. Taylor, Mineral. Mag. J. Mineral. Soc.
(1876–1968) 36 (1967) 465.
[18] R.M. Taylor, Clay Miner. 17 (1982) 369.
[19] H.F.W. Taylor, Mineral. Mag. J. Mineral. Soc. (1876–1968)
37 (1969) 338.
The differences in the thermal decomposition be-
tween the two minerals are:
[20] H.C.B. Hansen, C.B. Koch, Appl. Clay Sci. 10 (1995) 5.
[21] E.H. Nickel, J.E. Wildman, Mineral. Mag. 44 (1981) 333.
[22] D.L. Bish, A. Livingstone, Mineral. Mag. 44 (1981) 339.
[23] E.H. Nickel, R.M. Clarke, Am. Mineral. 61 (1976) 366.
[24] P.G. Rouxhet, H.F.W. Taylor, Chimia 23 (1969) 480.
[25] E.H. Nickel, R.M. Clarke, Am. Miner. 61 (1976) 366.
[26] E.H. Nickel, J.E. Wildman, Miner. Mag. 44 (1981) 333.
[27] R.L. Frost, A.M. Vassallo, Clays Clay Miner. 44 (1996) 635.
[28] R.L. Frost, B.M. Collins, K. Finnie, A.J. Vassallo, Clays
controlling environment, in: Proceedings of the 10th
International Clay Conference, Adelaide, 18–23 July 1993,
1995, p. 219.
(a) The hydrohonessite has significantly more carbon-
ate in the structure.
(b) More steps are involved in the thermal decompo-
sition of hydrohonessite.
(c) In general, the temperature of decomposition for
each step is less for hydrohonessite than that for
carrboydite.
The thermal analysis results are complemented by
the infrared emission spectra. These spectra confirm
the presence of carbonate in both minerals but only
in very low concentrations. This suggests that the for-
mula of carrboydite and hydrohonessite as written is
correct, namely Ni6Al2(SO4,CO3)(OH)16·4H2O and
Ni6Fe2(SO4,CO3)(OH)16·7H2O, respectively. The IE
spectra show the temperatures at which the water, the
[29] R.L. Frost, G.A. Cash, J.T. Kloprogge, Vib. Spectrosc. 16
(1998) 173.
[30] J.T. Kloprogge, S. Komarneni, K. Yanagisawa, R. Fry, R.L.
Frost, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 212 (1999) 562.
[31] J.T. Kloprogge, R. Fry, R.L. Frost, J. Catal. 184 (1999) 157.
[32] J.T. Kloprogge, R.L. Frost, An infrared emission spectro-
scopic study of synthetic and natural pyrophyllite. Neues
Jahrbuch fuer Mineralogie, Monatschefte (1999) (2), 62–74.