Jiang et al.
Table 1. Crystal Data and Structural Refinements for
Ni3(Mo2O8)(XO3) (X ) Se, Te)
Experimental Section
Materials and Instrumentation. All of the chemicals except
NiO were analytically pure from commercial sources and used
without further purification. Neodymium(III) oxide, transition-metal
oxides, and halides were purchased from the Shanghai Reagent
Factory, and TeO2 (99+%) and SeO2 (99+%) were purchased from
Acros Organics. NiO was synthesized by heating Ni2O3 in air at
610 °C for 12 h, and its purity was checked by X-ray powder
diffraction (XRD) (see the Supporting Information).8a XRD patterns
were collected on a XPERT-MPD θ-2θ diffractometer. The
chemical compositions of the two compounds were analyzed by a
field-emission scanning-electron microscope (FESEM, JSM6700F)
equipped with an energy dispersive X-ray spectroscope (EDS,
Oxford INCA). The absorption spectra were recorded on a PE
Lambda 900 UV-vis spectrophotometer in the wavelength range
of 200-2200 nm. The absorption spectra were determined by the
diffuse-reflectance technique.8b F(R) and R are linked by F(R) )
(1 - R)2/2R, where R is the reflectance and F(R) is the Kubelka-
Munk remission function. The minima in the second-derivative
curves of the Kubelka-Munk function are taken as the position of
the absorption bands. IR spectra were recorded on a Magna 750
Ni3(Mo2O8)(SeO3)
Ni3(Mo2O8)(TeO3)
fw
622.97
671.61
space group
a, Å
b, Å
P1h (No. 2)
6.4630(7)
6.4654(4)
10.0262(5)
73.949(10)
86.288(17)
84.856(16)
400.65(5)
2
5.164
14.565
0.984
0.0357, 0.0847
0.0412, 0.0878
C2/m (No. 12)
9.562(3)
8.756(3)
10.082(3)
90
103.228(7)
90
821.7(4)
4
5.429
13.254
1.106
0.0175, 0.0413
0.0186, 0.0418
c, Å
R, deg
â, deg
γ, deg
V, Å3
Z
D
calcd, g‚cm-3
µ, mm-1
GOF on F2
R1, wR2 [I>2σ(I)]a
R1, wR2 (all data)
a R1 ) ∑||Fo| - |Fc||/∑|Fo|, wR2 ) {∑w[(Fo)2 - (Fc)2]2/∑w[(Fo)2]2}1/2
.
Ni3(Mo2O8)(TeO3) was obtained quantitatively by the reaction of
a mixture of NiO/MoO3/TeO2 in a molar ratio of 3:2:1 at 720 °C
for 6 days (see the Supporting Information). IR data (KBr, cm-1):
990 (vw), 928 (vs), 895 (vs), 770 (s), 748 (s), 670 (vs), 652 (s),
636 (vs), 478 (m), 456 (s), 417 (w).
FT-IR spectrometer as KBr pellets in the range of 4000-400 cm-1
.
Thermogravimetric analyses (TGA) were carried out with a
NETZSCH STA 449C unit, at a heating rate of 10 °C/min under a
static air atmosphere. Magnetic susceptibility measurements on
polycrystalline samples were performed with a PPMS-9T magne-
tometer in the temperature range 2-300 K.
Single-Crystal Structure Determination. Data collections for
the two compounds were performed on a Rigaku Mercury CCD
diffractometer equipped with a graphite-monochromated Mo KR
radiation source (λ ) 0.71073 Å) at 293 K. Both data sets were
corrected for Lorentz and polarization factors as well as for
absorption by the multiscan method.9a Both structures were solved
by direct methods and refined by full-matrix least-squares fitting
on F2 by SHELX-97.9b All of the atoms were refined with
anisotropic thermal parameters. Crystallographic data and structural
refinements for the two compounds are summarized in Table 1.
Important bond distances are listed in Table 2. More details on the
crystallographic studies as well as atomic displacement parameters
are given as Supporting Information.
Computational Descriptions. The crystallographic data of the
two compounds were used for the band-structure calculations. The
ab initio band-structure calculations were performed by using the
computer code CASTEP.10 This code employs density functional
theory (DFT) using a plane-wave basis set with Vanderbilt ultrasoft
pseudopotentials to approximate the interactions between core and
valence electrons.11 The exchange-correlation energy was calculated
using the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof modification to the generalized
gradient approximation.12 A kinetic-energy cutoff of 300 eV was
used throughout our work. Pseudoatomic calculations were per-
formed for O 2s22p4, Se 4s24p4, Te 5s25p4, Mo 4s24p64d55s1, and
Ni 3d84s2. The parameters used in the calculations and convergence
criteria were set by the default values of the CASTEP code.10
Preparation of Ni3(Mo2O8)(SeO3). Green brick-shaped crystals
of Ni3(Mo2O8)(SeO3) were initially prepared by the solid-state
reaction of a mixture of Nd2O3 (0.118 g, 0.35 mmol), MoO3 (0.050
g, 0.35 mmol), NiCl2 (0.045 g, 0.35 mmol), and SeO2 (0.155 g,
1.4 mmol) in our attempt to prepare a Nd-Mo-Ni-Se-O-Cl
phase. The reaction mixture was thoroughly ground and pressed
into a pellet, which was then sealed into an evacuated quartz tube.
The quartz tube was heated at 300 °C for 1 day and at 700 °C for
5 days, then slowly cooled to 295 °C at 4.5 °C/hr. It was finally
cooled to room temperature in 16 h. Results of the EDS elemental
analyses gave a molar ratio of Ni/Mo/Se equal to 3.2/1.9/1.0, which
is in good agreement with the one determined from single-crystal
X-ray structural analysis. Though Nd(III) is not present in
Ni3(Mo2O8)(SeO3), the addition of Nd2O3 helps the crystallization
of Ni3(Mo2O8)(SeO3), and the quality of the crystals is very poor
when the synthesis is carried out in the absence of Nd2O3. The
pure powder product of Ni3(Mo2O8)(SeO3) was obtained quanti-
tatively by the reaction of a mixture of NiO/MoO3/SeO2 in a molar
ratio of 3:2:1 at 710 °C for 6 days in a similar procedure described
above (see the Supporting Information). IR data (KBr, cm-1): 961
(vs), 928 (vs), 858 (s), 764 (m), 710 (m), 656 (s), 624 (s), 524 (m),
462 (m), 442 (w), 410 (w).
Preparation of Ni3(Mo2O8)(TeO3). Green brick-shaped crystals
of Ni3(Mo2O8)(TeO3) were prepared by the solid-state reaction of
a mixture containing NiO (37.3 mg, 0.5 mmol), MoO3 (72.0 mg,
0.5 mmol), and TeO2 (239.4 g, 1.5 mmol). The reaction mixture
was thoroughly ground and pressed into a pellet, which was then
sealed into an evacuated quartz tube. The quartz tube was heated
at 720 °C for 6 days and then cooled to 270 °C at 4.5 °C/hr before
switching off the furnace. The EDS elemental analyses gave a molar
ratio of Ni/Mo/Te equal to 3.1/2.2/1.0, which is in good agreement
with the one determined from single-crystal X-ray structural
analysis. After proper structural analysis, a pure sample of
Results and Discussion
Solid-state reactions of nickel(II) oxide, molybdenum(VI)
oxide, and SeO2 or TeO2 afforded two new nickel(II)
(9) (a) CrystalClear, version 1.3.5; Rigaku Corp.: Woodlands, TX, 1999.
(b) Sheldrick, G. M. SHELXTL, Crystallographic Software Package,
version 5.1; Bruker-AXS: Madison, WI, 1998.
(10) (a) Segall, M. D.; Lindan, P. L. D.; Probert, M. J.; Pickard, C. J.;
Hasnip, P. J.; Clark, S. J.; Payne, M. C. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter
2002, 14, 2717. (b) Segall, M.; Lindan, P.; Probert, M.; Pickard, C.;
Hasnip, P.; Clark, S.; Payne, M. Materials Studio CASTEP, version
2.2; Accelerys, Inc.: San Diego, CA, 2002.
(11) Vanderbilt, D. Phys. ReV. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 1990,
41, 7892.
(8) (a) Barrett, C. A.; Evans, E. B. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1964, 47, 533. (b)
Kubelka, P.; Munk, F. Z. Tech. Phys. 1931, 12, 593.
(12) Perdew, J. P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Phys. ReV. Lett. 1996, 77,
3865.
6496 Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 46, No. 16, 2007