ARTICLE IN PRESS
S. Thota, J. Kumar / Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 68 (2007) 1951–1964
1963
attempt frequency (n ) for magnetization flips; (ii) linear
system. Further, the frequency-dependent (1–1000 Hz) and
field-dependent (10–600 Oe) ac susceptibility (w) measure-
ment data in conjunction with the above results provide
0
0
0
variation of temperature (corresponding to peak in the w
vs T plot) with H following de Almeida–Thouless (AT)
2
/3
line [53,54], and showing SG transition temperature (T ) as
f
evidence and rule out the SG behaviour (that means T is
2
ꢀ
167 K (usually referred as the blocking temperature); and
iii) disappearance of peak noticed in MZFC vs T at high
fields (ꢀ20 kOe). On the contrary, the present results show:
i) reasonable values of E and n , (ii) absence of linear
the blocking T and not the SG transition temperature T )
B
g
(
for NiO nanoparticles. Instead, the observations suggest
core–shell description for NiO nanoparticles. While the
core behaves like a ferrimagnet because of prevailing lack
of spin compensation due to reduced size, shell contains
randomly oriented spins with low co-ordination and is
possibly responsible for sharp increase in MZFC below 30 K
as a result of collective freezing effect and or presence of
secondary phase of low Curie temperature. Finally, the
increase of blocking temperature from 115 to 265 K as well
as energy band gap from 3.57 to 3.68 eV observed with
decreasing average particle size (13.4–4.1 nm) seems to
have a common origin and caused by size effects, viz.
confinement of charge carriers and increase in the
uncompensated core spins, respectively.
(
a
0
2
/3
variation of T with H , (iii) T as blocking temperature
and not the SG transition temperature, (iv) existence of
peak corresponding to temperature T at high fields of
2
2
2
2
0 kOe and (v) hysteresis loops even at 5 K. The room
temperature optical absorption studies further reveal
increase of energy band gap with decreasing crystallite
size, the values being 3.57, 3.63 and 3.68 eV for NiO
powders of average particle size of 13.4, 6.8 and 4.1 nm,
respectively. Such a result in fact, corresponds to a blue
shift of the optical absorption edge usually observed in
semiconductor nanoparticles due to quantum size effects
[
55]. The extent of quantum confinement increases with
decrease in particle size and leads to widening of the energy
band gap. The increase blocking temperature as well
as energy band gap observed with decreasing particle
size in the present work appears to have common origin
and caused mainly by size effect (i.e., confinement of
charge carriers and increase in the surface spin density,
respectively).
References
[1] R.W. Chantrell, K. O’Grady, in: R. Gerber, C.D. Wright, G. Asti
(Eds.), Applied Magnetism, Kluwer Academic Publishers, The
Netherlands, 1994, p. 113.
[
[
2] D. Weller, A. Moser, IEEE Trans. Magn. 35 (1999) 4423.
3] G.C. Hadjipanayis, G.A. Prinz, Science and Technology of Nanos-
tructurated Materials, Plenum Press, New York, 1991.
4] Q.A. Pankhust, J. Connolly, S.K. Jones, J. Dobsan, J. Phys. D: Appl.
Phys. 36 (2003) R167.
[
[
4
. Conclusions
5] J.P. Bucher, D.C. Douglass, L.A. Bloomfield, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66
(
1991) 3052.
Nickel oxalate dihydrate (NiC O ꢂ 2H O) synthesized by
2
4
2
[6] I.M.L. Billas, A. Chatelain, W.A. De Heer, Science 265 (1994) 1682.
[7] E.E. Fullerton, J.S. Jiang, C.H. Sowers, J.E. Pearson, S.D. Bader,
Appl. Phys. Lett. 72 (1998) 380.
the sol–gel process corresponds to an orthohombic
structure. Its decomposition at 300–600 1C for 2 h in air
yields NiO nanoparticles (size ꢀ4–22 nm) with fcc structure
[8] S. Jung, B. Watkins, L. DeLong, J.B. Ketterson, V. Chandrasekhar,
Phys. Rev. B 66 (2002) 132401.
having lattice parameter in the range 4.168–4.1887
˚
.005 A, but decreasing with increasing the average crystal-
[9] U. Ebels, J.L. Duvail, P.E. Wigen, L. Piraux, L.D. Buda,
K. Ounadjela, Phys. Rev. B 64 (2001) 144421.
0
lite size. They exhibit anomalous magnetic characteristics
at low temperatures, viz.: (i) unusual magnetization values
at low temperatures with SPM behaviour above the
[10] A.E. Berkowitz, J.R. Mitchell, M.J. Carey, A.P. Young, S. Zhang,
F.E. Spada, F.T. Parker, A. Hutten, G. Thomas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68
(
1992) 3745.
[
[
[
11] J.Q. Xiao, J.S. Jiang, C.L. Chien, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68 (1992) 3749.
12] X. Batlle, A. Lambarta, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 35 (2002) R15.
13] J.A. Mydosh, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 7 (1978) 237.
bifurcation temperature T ; (ii) irreversibilities in the
1
temperature-dependent dc magnetization plot (M) up to
20 kOe under ZFC and FC conditions, two peaks (i.e.,
broad at T and a sharp one at T ) in MZFC(T) curves
[14] S. Gider, D.D. Awschalom, S. Mann, M. Chaparala, Science 268
1995) 77.
(
15] R.D. Shull, IEEE Trans. Magn. 29 (1993) 2614.
16] C.R. Martin, P. Kohli, Nat. Rev. Drug Dis. 2 (2003) 29.
2
3
[
[
[
below T , (iii) decrease of both T and T (range being
2
1
1
1
crystallite size, and (iv) shift of T and T towards lower
15–325 and 95–265 K, respectively) with increasing
17] L. Ne
Temperature Physics, Gordon and Beach, New York, 1962, p. 411.
[18] L. Neel, Ann. Geophys. 5 (1949) 99.
19] M.S. Seehra, V.S. Babu, A. Manivannan, J.W. Lynn, Phys. Rev. B 61
2000) 3513.
20] M. Ghosh, K. Biswas, A. Sundareshan, C.N.R. Rao, J. Mater. Chem.
6 (2006) 106.
´
el, in: C. De Witt, B. Dreyfus, P.D. De Gennes (Eds.), Low
2
3
and higher temperatures, respectively, in MZFC(T) curves
with increase of applied magnetic field (typical value of T2
and T being 90 and 30 K, respectively at measuring field of
´
[
[
(
3
2
0 kOe for nanoparticles of average size ꢀ6.8 nm).
The bifurcation of M (T) and M (T) curves even at
1
ZFC
FC
[21] F. Bodker, M.F. Hansen, C.B. Koch, S. Morup, J. Magn. Magn.
Mater. 221 (2000) 32.
high measuring field of 20 kOe, stretched ‘‘S’’- or eye-like
shaped hysteresis loops at 5 K, shift of MFC(H) from
MZFC(H) by 590 Oe in the direction opposite to the cooling
field and progressive increase of MFC with decrease of
temperature (i.e., absence of flattening in MFC vs T plot at
low temperatures) suggest feebly interacting nature of NiO
[
[
22] W.F. Brown Jr., Phys. Rev. 130 (1963) 677.
23] E.M. Chudnovsky, J. Tejada, Macroscopic Quantum Tunneling of
the Magnetic Moment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
1
994.
[24] M.M. Ibrahim, S. Darwish, M. Seehra, Phys. Rev. B 51 (1995) 2955.
[25] R.H. Kodama, A.E. Berkowitz, Phys. Rev. B 59 (1999) 6321.