comprise the structural core, eight (42%) are involved in ring
fusions. This uncharacteristically high level of ring interde-
pendence provides a unique challenge for traditional annu-
lation approaches whose implementation might result in a
rather linear approach. Figure 2 outlines the key elements
through the intermediate norcaradiene and regioselective cy-
clopropane ring-opening to deliver the â-tetralone.11 Regio-
selective dimethylation at the more acidic benzylic methylene
could be effected in 71% yield using potassium tert-butoxide
in tert-butanol and methyl iodide in slight excess.12 Treatment
of this intermediate with IBX in a DMSO-toluene binary
solvent mixture led in 65% yield to the key enone 4.13
Schiff base 5 (now available commercially, or prepared
in one step from benzophenone imine and R-chloro tert-butyl
acetate14) adds to enone 4 under conditions of standard phase
transfer catalysis to deliver the product of Michael addition
in 79% isolated yield, and as a single diastereomer as
observed by 1H NMR of the crude reaction mixture. We did
not determine the relative stereochemistry since the two chiral
centers would not be preserved in the targeted intermediate.
Conversion of the aryl bromide to the derived indoline
proceeded as anticipated after application of standard radical-
generating conditions (nBu3SnH, AIBN, 90 °C). The isolated
yield of the intermediate indoline was 66%, and notably, the
reduced aryl halide amounted to no more than 5% of the
crude reaction mixture when it could be detected. The
indoline was immediately oxidized to the desired intermedi-
ate 7 through the application of DDQ in benzene-ethyl
acetate at 60 °C. In this manner, indole 7 was retrieved in
60% yield in addition to 20% of unreacted indoline.
A solution to the construction of the stereochemically rich
D-ring of ambiguine G has also been developed. This region
of the indoloterpene natural products of interest here is a
substructure with functional and stereochemical diversity
(Figure 1). The Vicinal presentation of a chlorine atom and
gem-methyl/vinyl arrangement is identical between ambigu-
ines D and G, whereas hapalindole L and welwitindolinone
A present a diastereomeric relationship. In only the total
synthesis of hapalindole G has this substructure been
addressed. Specifically, the Fukuyama route began from (-)-
carvone and in nine steps converted the R-methyl enone to
a neopentyl chloride by way of a stereospecific cyclopropane
ring-opening by chloride.
Figure 2. Ambiguine G: key retrosynthetic disconnections.
of a global solution to this problem. Instead of reliance on
an indole template, we targeted the construction of the BC
rings by a Buchner reaction,7 followed by selective frag-
mentation of the norcaradiene intermediate. The Α-ring
would then be annulated using a sequence of carbon-carbon
and aryl-nitrogen bond formations. Separately, we sought
a means to validate the use of a Diels-Alder cycloaddition
to establish the chiral chlorocyclohexane.
We targeted intermediate 4 as a template for design of a
convergent indoline annulation. Our plan was to combine
the operationally mild nature of free radical-mediated aryl
amination8,9 with conjugate addition of a glycine Schiff base10
(5) to a suitably functionalized â-tetralone (4).
o-Bromobenzyl acetic acid (2) was homologated to
R-diazo ketone 3 in 88% overall yield by treatment of the
derived acid chloride with diazomethane. This intermediate
was then treated with rhodium(II) acetate at elevated tem-
perature to effect a formal aryl C-H insertion, proceeding
Our initial solution to the stereocontrolled construction of
this subunit utilizes the Diels-Alder cycloaddition shown
in Scheme 2. We first prepared the requisite â-chloro
methacrolein 8 using the Arnold synthesis.15 In practice
however, we were unable to obtain consistent outcomes
during our attempts to increase the scale of the preparation.
As an alternative, we modified the procedure developed by
Williard to convert methallyl chloride to E-enal 8 in four
steps.16 Following the final oxidation with manganese
dioxide, the olefin isomers were converged to desired E-8
by treatment with p-toluene sulfonic acid. This aldehyde is
(5) Hapalindoles J, M, O, H, U: Muratake, H.; Natsume, M. Tetrahedron
1990, 46, 6331. Sakagami, M.; Muratake, H.; Natsume, M. Chem. Pharm.
Bull. 1994, 42, 1393. Muratake, H.; Kumagami, H.; Natsume, M.
Tetrahedron 1990, 46, 6351. Hapalindole Q: Vaillancourt, V.; Albizati,
K. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 3499. Kinsman, A. C.; Kerr, M. A.
Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3189. Hapalindole G: Fukuyama, T.; Chen, X. Q. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 3125. Welwitindolinone A, fischerindoles I, G:
Baran, P. S.; Richter, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 15394.
Welwitindolinone A: Reisman, S. E.; Ready, J. M.; Hasuoka, A.; Smith,
C. J.; Wood, J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 1448. (+)-Ambiguine H,
(-)-hapalindole U, (-)-fischerindole I, (+)-welwitindolinone A: Baran,
P. S.; Maimone, T. J.; Richter, J. M. Nature 2007, 446, 404.
(6) Selected reports toward these natural product classes: MacKay, J.
A.; Bishop, R. L.; Rawal, V. H. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 3421.
(7) Buchner, E. Ber. 1896, 29, 106. Ye, T.; Mckervey, M. A. Chem.
ReV. 1994, 94, 1091. Maas, G. Top. Curr. Chem. 1987, 137, 75.
(8) Johnston, J. N.; Plotkin, M. A.; Viswanathan, R.; Prabhakaran, E.
N. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 1009. Viswanathan, R.; Mutnick, D.; Johnston, J. N.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 7266. Viswanathan, R.; Prabhakaran, E. N.;
Plotkin, M. A.; Johnston, J. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 163. Srinivasan,
J. M.; Burks, H. E.; Smith, C. R.; Viswanathan, R.; Johnston, J. N. Synthesis-
Stuttgart 2005, 330.
(11) Cordi, A. A.; Lacoste, J. M.; Hennig, P. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
1 1993, 3. Dias, H. V. R.; Browning, R. G.; Richey, S. A.; Lovely, C. J.
Organometallics 2005, 24, 5784. Lovely, C. J.; Browning, R. G.; Badari-
narayana, V.; Dias, H. V. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 2453.
(12) Gorka, A.; Hazai, L.; Szantay, C.; Hada, V.; Szabo, L.; Szantay, C.
Heterocycles 2005, 65, 1359.
(9) Free radical-mediated vinyl amination: Nugent, B. M.; Williams,
A. L.; Prabhakaran, E. N.; Johnston, J. N. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 8877.
Prabhakaran, E. N.; Nugent, B. M.; Williams, A. L.; Nailor, K. E.; Johnston,
J. N. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 4197.
(10) (a) O’Donnell, M. J. In Catalytic Asymmetric Synthesis 2nd Ed.;
Ojima, I. Ed.; Wiley-VCH: New York, Chapter 10, 2000. (b) O’Donnell,
M. J.; Boniece, J. M.; Earp, S. E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1978, 2641. (c)
O’Donnell, M. J.; Eckrich, T. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1978, 4625.
(13) Nicolaou, K. C.; Gray, D. L. F.; Montagnon, T.; Harrison, S. T.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 996.
(14) Eils, S.; Rossen, K.; Jahn, W.; Klement, I. Eur. Patent 1207151,
2002. Siebum, A. H. G.; Woo, W. S.; Lugtenburg, J. Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2003, 4664.
(15) Arnold, Z.; Zemlicka, J. Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 1959, 24,
2385.
(16) Williard, P. G.; Delaszlo, S. E. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 3738.
5028
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 24, 2007