A R T I C L E S
Himmelberger et al.
acid catalysts,22 nano- and mesoporous scaffolds,23-25 and ionic
liquids.5 There has likewise been significant recent progress in
the development of efficient AB regeneration processes.26
We have previously shown27,28 that the addition of small
amounts of either LiH or LiNH2 to AB in the solid state
eliminated the induction period and increased both the rate and
extent of H2-release at 85 °C. As outlined in eqs 2 and 3, the
initial step in these reactions was proposed to be AB deproto-
dimethylimidazolium chloride (bdmimCl), and 1-ethyl-2,3-dime-
thylimidazolium ethylsulfate (edmimEtSO4) ionic liquids (Fluka)
were dried by toluene azeotropic distillation. Tetraethylene glycol
dimethyl ether (tetraglyme, Sigma, 99%) and ethylene glycol
dimethyl ether (glyme, Sigma, 99%) were vacuum distilled from
sodium with heating. Bis(dimethylamino)naphthalene (Proton Sponge,
PS, Aldrich) was sublimed and stored under inert atmosphere and
light-free conditions. Lithium triethylborohydride (1.0 M solution
in THF) and potassium triethylborohydride (1.0 M solution in THF)
(Aldrich) were used as received.
Physical Measurements. The Toepler pump system used for
hydrogen measurements was similar to that described by Shriver31
and is diagrammed in the Supporting Information (Figure S1). The
gases released from the reaction vessel were first passed through a
liquid nitrogen trap before continuing on to the Toepler pump (700
mL). The released H2 was then pumped into a series of calibrated
volumes, with the final pressure of the collected H2 gas measured
((0.5 mm) with the aid of a U-tube manometer. After the H2-
measurement was completed, the in-line liquid nitrogen trap was
warmed to room temperature, and the amount of any volatiles that
had been trapped was then also measured using the Toepler pump.
The automated gas buret was based on the design reported by
Zheng et al.32 but employed all glass connections, with a cold trap
(-78 °C) inserted between the reaction flask and buret to allow
trapping of any volatiles that might have been produced during the
reaction.
-
nation to produce the H3BNH2 anion, with this anion then
inducing anionic dehydropolymerization of AB to produce a
growing polyaminoborane polymer (eq 4).
-
H3BNH3 + Li+NH2 f H3BNH2-Li+ + NH3
(2)
(3)
H3BNH3 + Li+H- f H3BNH2-Li+ + H2
H3BNH2-Li+ + H3BNH3 f H3BNH2BH2NH2-Li+ + H2
(4)
Unfortunately, these reactions stopped after the release of
∼1.5 equiv of H2 due at least in part to the formation of the
LiBH4 side product via the reactions in eqs 5 and 6. Since LiBH4
does not decompose until >350 °C, its formation reduces the
extent of AB H2-release at 85 °C.29
Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was carried out on a
Setaram C80 calorimeter. Samples containing 50 mg of AB and
50 mg of bmimCl, without and with 5 mol % (18 mg) of PS, were
loaded into the cells under a N2 atmosphere. The ramp rate was 1
°C/min, and samples were taken to either 85 or 110 °C.
H3BNH2-Li+ f (H2BNH2) + Li+H-
(5)
(6)
-
H3BNH3 + Li+H- f Li+BH4 + NH3
While bmimCl is a liquid at 85 °C, it is a solid at room
temperature; therefore, solid-state 11B NMR analyses (at Pacific
Northwest National Laboratories, 240 MHz machine spun at 10
kHz) were used to monitor the products of reactions carried out in
bmimCl. All solid-state 11B chemical shifts were measured relative
to external NaBH4 (-41 ppm). The solution 11B NMR (128.4 MHz
Bruker DMX-400 instrument) studies in the room-temperature ionic
liquid mmimMeSO4 were carried out by heating the reaction
mixtures in sealed NMR tubes at 85 °C for the indicated times,
with the spectra taken at 25 °C. The 11B NMR spectra of the
reactions in tetraglyme were collected with the NMR heated at 80
°C. All solid-state and solution 11B NMR chemical shifts are
referenced to external BF3 ·O(C2H5)2 (0.0 ppm), with a negative
sign indicating an upfield shift.
Procedures for AB H2-Release Reactions. For the experiments
where the released H2 was measured with the Toepler pump, the
AB (250 mg, 8.1 mmol) was loaded into the reaction flasks under
N2. The solid-state reactions of AB/PS mixtures were carried out
in evacuated 500 mL break-seal flasks that were heated in an oven
preheated to the desired temperature. The solids were initially only
crudely mixed, since upon heating the solid mixtures were found
to form a melt before the onset of H2-release. Reactions in solution
were loaded into ∼100 mL flasks with the ionic liquid and PS in
the amounts given in the tables. The flasks were then evacuated,
sealed, and placed in a hot oil bath preheated to the desired
temperature. The flasks were opened at the indicated times, and
the released hydrogen was quantified using the Toepler pump
system. After reaction, the flasks were evacuated for 30 min through
the cold trap to remove any volatile products from the reaction
residue. The product residues and volatiles in the cold trap were
extracted with dry glyme and analyzed by 11B NMR.
In order to avoid the formation of stable alkali-metal
borohydrides, we investigated the use of alternative nitrogen-
based deprotonating agents to induce AB polymerization. We
report here that the strong (pKa ∼12), non-nucleophilic base
bis(dimethyamino)naphthalene (Proton Sponge, PS)30 can also
induce AB H2-release via an anionic dehydropolymerization
mechanism with the advantage that the formation of a stable
-
BH4 salt is avoided.
Experimental Section
Materials. All manipulations were carried out using standard
high-vacuum or inert atmosphere techniques, as described by
Shriver.31 Ammonia borane (AB, Aviabor, 97% minimum purity)
was ground into a free-flowing powder using a commercial coffee
grinder. The 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride (bmimCl), 1,3-
dimethylimidazolium methylsulfate (mmimMeSO4), 1-butyl-2,3-
(21) Forster, T. D.; Tuononen, H. M.; Parvez, M.; Roesler, R. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2009, 131, 6689–6691.
(22) Stephens, F. H.; Baker, R. T.; Matus, M. H.; Grant, D. J.; Dixon,
D. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 746–749.
(23) Gutowska, A.; Li, L.; Shin, Y.; Wang, C. M.; Li, X. S.; Linehan,
J. C.; Smith, R. S.; Kay, B. D.; Schmid, B.; Shaw, W. J.; Gutowski,
M.; Autrey, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 3578–3582.
(24) Paolone, A.; Palumbo, O.; Rispoli, P.; Cantelli, R.; Autrey, T.;
Karkamkar, A. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 10319–10321.
(25) Sepehri, S.; Feaver, A.; Shaw, W. J.; Howard, C. J.; Zhang, Q.; Autrey,
T.; Cao, G. J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111, 14285–14289.
(26) Davis, B. L.; Dixon, D. A.; Garner, E. B.; Gordon, J. C.; Matus, M. H.;
Scott, B.; Stephens, F. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 6812–
6816.
(27) Sneddon, L. G. DOE Hydrogen Program Review, 2007; http://
(28) Bluhm, M. E.; Bradley, M. G.; Sneddon, L. G. Prepr. Symp.sAm.
Chem. Soc., DiV. Fuel Chem. 2006, 51, 571–572.
For reactions using the automated gas buret, the AB (150 mg,
4.87 mmol) samples were loaded into ∼100 mL flasks with
(29) Fang, Z. Z.; Wang, P.; Rufford, T. E.; Kang, X. D.; Lu, G. Q.; Cheng,
H. M. Acta Mater. 2008, 56, 6257–6263.
(32) Zheng, F.; Rassat, S. D.; Helderandt, D. J.; Caldwell, D. D.; Aardahl,
C. L.; Autrey, T.; Linehan, J. C.; Rappe, K. G. ReV. Sci. Instrum.
2008, 79, 084103-1–084103-5.
(33) (a) CrystalClear; Rigaku Corporation, 1999. (b) Crystal Structure
Analysis Package; Rigaku Corp. Rigaku/MSC, 2002.
(30) Alder, R. W. Chem. ReV. 1989, 89, 1215–1223.
(31) Shriver, D. F.; Drezdzon, M. A. Manipulation of Air SensitiVe
Compounds, 2nd ed.; Wiley: New York, 1986.
9
14102 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 131, NO. 39, 2009