052907-3
Park et al.
Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 052907 ͑2010͒
oxide owing to the physically thicker dielectrics for the same
EOT. The reduced leakage current leads to an improvement
of the erase window. When the Gd percentage is high, the
film is crystallized into many different phases depending on
the Gd percentage. The crystallization of the GdAlO film
causes a change of the band gap of the GdAlO film, resulting
in a change of the retention properties. It was also found that
once GdAlO is crystallized, the film becomes more vulner-
able to trap generation. Therefore, for the design of flash
memory devices, it is necessary to consider the trade-off re-
lationship between the erase window and retention properties
which depend on the Gd concentration in GdAlO film.
FIG. 4. ͑Color online͒ The charge retention property of fresh devices at
room temperature ͑open circle͒ and 150 °C ͑filled square͒ and that of a
device cycled for 1000 program/erase at 150 °C ͑open diamond͒. Due to the
increase of the band gap of the crystallized GdAlO, the charge loss property
is improved. However, the crystallized GdAlO is more vulnerable to trap
generation during program/erase cycling.
This work was financially supported by Hynix Semicon-
ductor Inc. The authors would like to thank Jusung Engineer-
ing Co. and UP Chemical Co. for the ALD equipment and
the precursor supports, respectively.
1K. Kim and J. Choi, Proceedings of the IEEE Nonvolatile Semiconductor
Memory Workshop 2006 ͑IEEE, Monterey, CA, 2006͒ , p. 9.
2Y. Park, J. Choi, C. Kang, C. Lee, Y. Shin, B. Choi, J. Kim, S. Jeon, J. Sel,
J. Park, K. Choi, T. Yoo, J. Sim, and K. Kim, Tech. Dig. - Int. Electron
Devices Meet. 2006, 346900.
lows: ͑1͒ ⌬Vfb after 24 h at 150 °C, ͑2͒ ⌬Vfb after 11 days at
room temperature and then projected to 10 years, and ͑3͒
1000 program and erase cycling followed by measuring ⌬Vfb
after 24 h at 150 °C. The charge loss, represented by ⌬Vfb is
plotted as a function of the gadolinium percentage in Fig. 4.
The result shows that at room temperature, ͉⌬Vfb͉ increases
with the Gd percentage up to 71% and then bounces back
and decreases. This indicates that the maximum charge loss
occurs at 71% Gd at room temperature. However, at the high
temperature of 150 °C, the maximum charge loss occurs at
49% of Gd. The charge loss is then reduced for higher Gd
concentrations. It is well known that at a high temperature
such as 150 °C, the thermionic emission over the conduction
band of the blocking oxide becomes even more important for
150 °C in Fig. 4 resembles very much the band gap and
band offset curve in Fig. 3͑b͒. Therefore, the retention data is
further evidence of the increase in band gap and band offset
for the crystallized GdAlO. When the device is repeatedly
programmed and erased, charge traps are formed in the
blocking oxide, resulting in degradation of the retention
property. The charge loss properties of the GdAlO devices
were evaluated after 1000 program/erase ͑P/E͒ cycles at
150 °C. This result is shown in Fig. 4 ͑open diamonds͒.
Compared to P/E cycled and fresh devices, there is no deg-
radation after P/E cycling when the Gd percentage is below
35%. However, noticeable degradation occurs in the devices
with Gd percentages of 49% and above, which is the percent-
age range for the crystallization of GdAlO. This result indi-
cates that crystallized GdAlO is more vulnerable to charge
trap generation by electrical stress.
3C. H. Lee, K. I. Choi, M. K. Cho, Y. H. Song, K. C. Park, and K. Kim,
Tech. Dig. - Int. Electron Devices Meet. 2003, 613 ͑2003͒.
4C. H. Lee, C. Kang, J. Sim, J. S. Lee, J. Kim, Y. Shin, K. T. Park, S. Jeon,
J. Sel, Y. Jeong, B. Choi, V. Kim, W. Jung, C. I. Hyun, J. Choi, and K.
Kim, Proceedings of the IEEE Nonvolatile Semiconductor Memory Work-
shop 2006 ͑IEEE, Monterey, CA, 2006͒, p. 54.
5J. A. Kittl, K. Opsomer, M. Popovici, N. Menou, B. Kaczer, X. P. Wanga,
C. Adelmann, M. A. Pawlak, K. Tomida, A. Rothschild, B. Govoreanu, R.
Degraeve, M. Schaekers, M. Zahid, A. Delabie, J. Meersschaut, W. Pols-
poel, S. Clima, G. Pourtois, W. Knaepen, C. Detavernier, V. V. Afanas’ev,
T. Blomberg, D. Pierreux, J. Swerts, P. Fischer, J. W. Maes, D. Manger, W.
Vandervorst, T. Conard, A. Franquet, P. Favia, H. Bender, B. Brijs, S. Van
6W. H. Chang, C. H. Lee, P. Chang, Y. C. Chang, Y. J. Lee, J. Kwo, C. C.
͑2009͒.
7T. Hattori, T. Yoshida, T. Shiraishi, K. Takahashi, H. Nohira, S. Joumori,
K. Nakajima, M. Suzuki, K. Kimura, I. Kashiwagi, C. Ohshima, S. Ohmi,
11, H252 ͑2008͒.
10O. Bierwagen, L. Geelhaar, X. Gay, M. Piešiņš, H. Riechert, B. Jobst, and
11S. Miyazaki, H. Nishimura, M. Fukuda, L. Ley, and J. Ristein, Appl. Surf.
Sci. 113-114, 585 ͑1997͒.
12H. Y. Yu, M. F. Li, B. J. Cho, C. C. Yeo, M. S. Joo, D.-L. Kwong, J. S.
376 ͑2002͒.
15A. Arreghini, N. Akil, F. Driussi, D. Esseni, L. Selmi, and M. J. van
In conclusion, this study showed that the use of GdAlO
can significantly reduce the leakage current of the blocking
193.0.65.67 On: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 10:31:53