M.V. Bracamonte et al. / Electrochimica Acta 56 (2011) 1316–1322
1317
first, the LBL self-assembly of QCHI and NP at thiolated gold elec-
trodes as electrochemical platform; and second, the adsorption of
QCHI-GOD multilayers on this platform as biosensing element. We
present the electrochemical characterization of the QCHI-NP plat-
form, the analysis of GOD adsorption at the QCHI-NP electrode by
surface plasmon resonance (SPR), as well as the analysis of the
bioelectrocatalytic activity of the immobilized GOD by scanning
electrochemical microscopy (SECM) and amperometry.
Construction of QCHI-NP platform: The multilayer was obtained
by alternating immersion of the electrode in QCHI and NP solutions.
−
1
QCHI adsorption was performed by immersion in a 0.50 mg mL
−
2
−3
QCHI solution prepared in 5.00 × 10 mol dm phosphate buffer
pH 7.40 for 20 min. NP were adsorbed for 60 min from the com-
mercial solution. After each adsorption step, the surfaces were
copiously rinsed with 5.00 × 10 mol dm phosphate buffer pH
7.40. The resulting electrodes are indicated as Au/MPS/(QCHI-NP)n,
being n the number of QCHI-NP adsorption steps. The effect of
NP adsorption time was evaluated by varying the immersion time
of Au/MPS/QCHI electrodes in the NP solution between 15 and
−
2
−3
2
. Experimental
1
20 min.
Construction of QCHI-GOD multilayer: The adsorption of the
enzyme was carried out by alternating immersion of Au/MPS elec-
2
.1. Reagents
Gold nanoparticles (NP) citrate stabilized of 10 nm nominal
−
1
−1
trodes in 0.50 mg mL QCHI solution for 20 min and 1.0 mg mL
GOD solution for 30 min. Both solutions were prepared in
5
adsorption step, the electrodes were copiously rinsed with the
phosphate buffer solution. The resulting electrodes are indicated as
Au/MPS/(QCHI-GOD)m, being m the number of QCHI-GOD adsorp-
tion steps.
The same procedures were done for electrodes previ-
ously modified with the QCHI-NP platform, being indicated as
Au/MPS/(QCHI-NP)n/(QCHI-GOD)m.
diameter (Catalog number G-1527) and glucose oxidase (GOD)
Type X-S, Aspergillus niger, EC 1.1.3.4, 210,000 Units per gram of
solid, MW 160 kDa), were obtained from Sigma. Hydrogen peroxide
(
−
2
−3
.00 × 10 mol dm
phosphate buffer pH 7.40. After each
(
(
30% V/V aqueous solution) was from Baker. Ferrocenemethanol
FcOH) and 3-mercapto-1-propanesulfonic acid (MPS) were from
Aldrich. Chitosan (Pronova, Norway) with molecular weight of
1
−1
90,000 g mol was used for preparing the quaternized chitosan
(
QCHI) as described in reference [17]. The average molecular weight
−1
of the resulting QCHI was 52,750 g mol and the content of quat-
ernized amine 40.0 mol%. Other chemicals were reagent grade and
used without further purification. All solutions were prepared with
ultra-pure water (18 Mꢀ cm) from a Millipore MilliQ system.
2.4. Measuring procedures
2
.4.1. SECM
2.2. Equipment
Is a powerful tool that makes possible to obtain information
about chemical reactivity at interfaces, and kinetic data of het-
erogeneous reactions [18]. It is a scanning probe technique that
uses a positionable UME as probe [19]. We employed SECM to
evaluate the electrochemical reactivity of the modified electrodes
using feedback mode (FB), Scheme 1A. This method is based on the
measurement of the current produced at the UME, iT, when it is
brought close to the substrate in the presence of a redox mediator
Cyclic voltammetry (CV) and amperometry were performed
with an EPSILON potentiostat (Bioanalytical Systems Inc., USA).
Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy was performed with a CHI
9
00 (CH Instruments Inc., USA). A ca. 10 m diameter homemade
carbon fiber electrode served as ultramicroelectrode (UME), while
gold disk electrodes (Au) of 3 mm diameter (CHI 101) were used as
substrate. A rotating disk electrode (RDE) of gold (2 mm of diame-
ter, Radiometer Analytical, model EDI101 with tip model 35T110)
was used in connection with a speed control unit (Radiometer Ana-
lytical, Model CTV101). In all the experiments a platinum wire and
Ag/AgCl, 3 M NaCl (BAS, Model RE-5B) were used as counter and ref-
erence electrodes, respectively. The experiments were performed
at room temperature.
SPR measurements were done with a single channel, AUTOLAB
SPRINGLE instrument (Eco Chemie, The Netherlands). The SPR sen-
sor disks (BK 7) were mounted on a hemicylindrical lens through
index-matching oil to form the base of a cuvette. Sample solutions
[
20,21]. The steady-state current of the UME positioned far from the
substrate is iT,∞ = 4naFDC. In diffusion-controlled positive feedback
case, iT > iT,∞, the substrate acts as a conductive surface producing
an additional flux of the redox mediator at the UME. On the con-
trary, in the negative feedback case, iT < iT,∞, the substrate acts as
an electrical insulator and hinders the flux of the redox mediator
at the UME surface [22].
−
4
−3
In our experiments, FcOH (5.0 × 10 mol dm solution) was
used as redox mediator. The UME and the substrate potentials were
held at 0.500 V and 0.000 V, respectively, to allow the feedback
takes place between both electrodes (see Scheme 1A). A series of
constant high images of the modified electrodes was obtained fol-
lowing the procedure described in [3]. The results are presented
in a dimensionless form normalizing the experimental feedback
current, iT, by the steady-state current iT,∞.
(
60 L) were injected manually into the cuvette. The measure-
◦
ments were carried out under non-flow liquid conditions at 25 C.
2
.3. Modification of gold surfaces
SECM was also used to detect the enzymatic activity of
the immobilized GOD. The analysis was performed in substrate
generation-tip collection mode (SG-TC) (Scheme 1B). In this oper-
ation method, the UME is approached to the surface modified with
the enzyme. In the presence of the substrate the reaction takes place
and the enzymatic activity is monitored at the UME by applying
a potential appropriated to detect an electroactive product of the
enzymatic reaction [23]. In our experiments, the detection of GOD
activity was based on the measurement of the hydrogen peroxide
formed according to the following reaction (see Scheme 1B):
The cleaning procedure of gold electrodes included polishing
with 0.05 m alumina for 6 min, careful sonication in deionized
water for 5 min, and immersion in “Piranha” solution (1:3 v/v
H O /98% H SO ) for 5 min, followed by a rinsing step with
2
2
2
4
ultrapure water. Caution: “Piranha” solution is very corrosive and
must be handled with care. The clean surfaces were stabilized by
−
1
cycling the potential between 0.200 V and 1.650 V at 10 V s
in
.50 mol dm sulfuric acid solution until obtaining a reproducible
response. Before each experiment, the surface was checked by CV
−3
0
−1
−3
at 0.100 V s in fresh 0.50 mol dm sulfuric acid solution.
The adsorption of MPS was performed by soaking the electrode
MPS solution prepared in
sulfuric acid solution, followed by a careful
rinsing with deionized water.
GOD
Glucose + O −→ Gluconolactone + H O
2
2
2
−2
−3
for 30 min in a 2.00 × 10 mol dm
−
3
−3
1
.6 × 10 mol dm
The UME was first positioned using FcOH, as described in refer-
ence [3]. The surface was carefully washed and the cell filled with