NMR STUDY OF THE INTERACTION OF TIN(II) AND ANTIMONY(III) FLUORIDES
463
19F and 31P NMR spectra of POFnCl3 – n compounds in ace-
tonitrile
spectra indicates that the fluorine atoms in the PF5 ·
MeCN complex are equivalent.
In addition, signals at 6.4 and 220.5 ppm are
observed in the 31P NMR spectrum. It is known that
[PCl6]– and [PCl4]+ ionic forms occur in solutions of
phosphorus pentachloride [10]. According to [8, 11],
[PCl4]+ reacts with MeCN to yield phosphonitrile com-
pounds producing 31P signals at 82 and 2.5 ppm. These
compounds tend to eliminate PCl3, whose signal is
observed in the weakest field (217 ppm) [8, 12]. There-
fore, the signal at 220.5 ppm is assigned to PCl3 and the
signal at 6.4 ppm should be assigned to the product of the
reaction between [PCl4]+ and MeCN or to POCl3 present
in PCl5 as an admixture or produced in hydrolysis.
Com-
31
δ(19F), ppm
δ( P), ppm
J
, Hz
J
F , Hz
31P–19
31P–19
F
pound
POCl3
POF2Cl
POF3
5.9
–22.9
–33.6
–82.2
–87.8
986
984
1068
1064
Therefore, when SnF2 and SbF3 are used as fluorine
donors in the reaction with POCl3, POF2Cl and POF3
are mainly formed. The above fluorides react with PCl5
in acetonitrile to yield higher phosphorus complexes
An increase in the solid SnF2 : PCl5 initial ratio in [PF6]– and [PF5 · MeCN]. No mixed fluorochloride
complex anions of the [PFnCl6 – n]– composition were
found. The reaction of SnF2 and SbF3 with POCl3 and
PCl5 in MeCN under the indicated conditions does not
result in the complete conversion of phosphorus chlo-
ride forms into fluorochloride or fluoride forms. In all
cases, the NMR spectra show signals due to the fluo-
rine-free phosphorus compounds.
acetonitrile up to 1 : 1 causes changes in the 19F and 31P
NMR spectra of the solutions (figure). In addition to the
signals at 220.7 and 6.6 ppm, the 31P NMR spectrum
shows a septet at –143.3 ppm with J
= 709 Hz
31P–19
F
assigned to the [PF6]– anion and two low-intensity quar-
tets at δ = –33.9 ppm with J = 1068 Hz (POF3)
31P–19
F
and at 104.1 ppm with J
= 1398 Hz. The latter
F
31P–19
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
multiplet signal was assigned to PF3 on the basis of the
values of the chemical shift and spin–spin coupling
constant. These multiplet signals correlate with dou-
This work was supported by the Russian Foundation
for Basic Research, project nos. 00-03-32580 and
00-15-97432.
blets at δ = –71.4 ppm with J
= 707 Hz ([PF6]–),
31P–19
F
at −87.6 ppm with J
= 1068 Hz (POF3), and at
F
= 1404 Hz (PF3) in the 19F
31P–19
REFERENCES
−36.4 ppm with J
31P–19
F
1. Kokunov,Yu.V. and Rakov, I.E., Zh. Neorg. Khim., 1997,
NMR spectrum.
vol. 42, no. 11, p. 1854.
A further increase in the solid SnF2 : PCl5 ratio in
acetonitrile is followed by a decrease in the intensity of
the signal at 220.6 ppm and an increase in the intensity
of the [PF6]– signal in the 31P NMR spectrum. The spec-
trum also contains signals due to POF3 and PF3. The
2. Kokunov, Yu.V., Ershova, M.M., and Razgonyaeva, G.A.,
Koord. Khim., 2000, vol. 26, no. 8, p. 575.
3. Kokunov, Yu.V., Ershova, M.M., Razgonyaeva, G.A.,
and Buslaev, Yu.A., Koord. Khim., 2001, vol. 27, no. 7,
p. 511.
character of the 19F spectra agrees with the 31P NMR
spectra. In addition to the aforementioned signals, the
31P NMR spectrum contains two low-intensity triplets
4. Kokunov, Yu.V., Ershova, M.M., Razgonyaeva, G.A.,
and Buslaev, Yu.A., Koord. Khim., 2001, vol. 27, no. 9,
p. 685.
5. Holmes, R.R., Carter, R.P., and Peterson, G.E., Inorg.
Chem., 1964, vol. 3, no. 12, p. 1748.
at δ = –5.0 ppm with J
= 1124 Hz and at 5.9 ppm
31P–19
F
with J
= 1119 Hz. They correlate with the two
F
31P–19
6. Carter, R.P. and Holmes, R.R., Inorg. Chem., 1965,
vol. 4, no. 6, p. 738.
low-intensity doublets at –64.3 ppm with J
=
31P–19
F
7. Buslaev, Yu.A., Il’in, E.G., and Shcherbakova, M.N.,
1121 Hz and at –63.7 ppm with J
= 1121 Hz in
31P–19
F
Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1974, vol. 219, no. 5, p. 1154.
the 19F NMR spectrum. The shape of the spectra, chemi-
cal shifts, and spin–spin coupling constants allow one to
assign these signals to the cis- and trans-[PF2Cl3 · MeCN]
complexes. The 119Sn spectra of the solutions show single
signals in the –680 to –690 ppm region assigned to the
polymeric tin(II) fluorine-containing cations.
8. Il’in, E.G., Shcherbakova, M.N., and Buslaev, Yu.A.,
Koord. Khim., 1975, vol. 1, no. 9, p. 1179.
9. Murin, I.V., Chernov, S.V., Vlasov, M.Yu., et al., Zh.
Prikl. Khim. (Leningrad), 1985, vol. 58, no. 11, p. 2439.
10. Schmulbach, C.D. and Ahmed, J.X., J. Chem. Soc., A,
1968, p. 3008.
According to the 19F and 31P NMR spectra, the inter-
action of SbF3 with PCl5 in acetonitrile does not differ
from the reaction of SnF2 with PCl5. In this case, [PF6]–
and [PF5 · MeCN] are also the main products in the s.
11. Zil’berman, E.N., Reaktsii nitrilov (Reactions of
Nitriles), Moscow: Khimiya, 1972, p. 366.
12. Van Wazer, J.R., Callis, C.F., Shoolery, J.N., and
Jones, R.C., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1956, vol. 78, p. 3715.
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF COORDINATION CHEMISTRY Vol. 28 No. 7 2002