998
C. Xu et al. / Catalysis Communications 12 (2011) 996–999
92
Table 2
90
88
86
84
82
80
Cu dispersion, metal area, and average particle size of the catalysts activated by H2 at
different temperature.a
Activation temperature/°C
DCu
%
Cu metal area (m2 g−1-cat)
rav/nm
300
360
400
35.84
29.89
23.39
30.67
25.58
20.01
2.9
3.5
4.5
FFR conversion
FFA selectivity
2-MF selectivity
2-dEMF selectivity
78
14
a
According to the H2–N2O titration.
12
10
8
It shows that the catalysts with highly dispersed catalytic active centers
can be obtained from the hydrotalcite-like materials as precursors.
6
4
2
3.3. Catalytic performance
0
200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 380 400 420
Activation temperature/oC
From the catalytic performance of different catalysts in the FFR
liquid-phase (ethanolic solution) hydrogenation (Table 3), it is found
that MgAlOy has almost no catalytic activity for the FFR hydrogena-
tion, and NiMgAlOy or CuMgAlOy gives above 52% of FFR conversion.
However, NiMgAlOy gives a higher proportion of 2-diethoxylmethxyl-
furan (2-DEMF) than CuMgAlOy. According to the H2-TPR results, it
can be deduced that the FFR acetalization [15] easily occurs due to the
presence of nickel cations as Lewis acids on the surface. The copper
cations will be less acidic and, thus, less efficient to catalyze the
acetalization of FFR. Meanwhile, CuNiMgAlOy gives the highest FFR
conversion (90.5%) and the lowest 2-DEMF selectivity, indicating that
the Ni2+ species have a synergistic effect on the FFR hydrogenation on
the Cu0 active centers in the catalysts.
Fig. 4 shows the results on the FFR liquid-phase hydrogenation
over CuNiMgAlOy catalysts activated by H2 at different temperatures.
There are three main products formed, FFA, 2-methylfuran (2-MF)
and 2-diethoxylmethxyl-furan (2-DEMF). FFA arises from FFR
hydrogenation and 2-DEMF results from FFA hydrogenolysis. More-
over, both FFR conversion and FFA selectivity clearly increase first and
then decrease upon increasing the activation temperature. However,
the 2-MF selectivity follows an inverse trend. The highest FFR
conversion (90.5%) and FFA selectivity (85.4%) are obtained along
with the lowest 2-MF selectivity (4.3%) at 300 °C. It shows that the
activation temperature is an important factor affecting the catalytic
properties of CuNiMgAlOy and 300 °C seems to be an optimum
activation temperature. According to the XPS and H2-TPR results, it is
also deduced that Cu0 species are the effective catalytic centers for the
FFR hydrogenation, which is in agreement with the previous reports
[1,2,12]. From the H2–N2O titration results, the decrease on both FFR
conversion and FFA selectivity upon increasing the temperature are
concluded to be due to the agglomeration of active Cu0 particles at a
high activation temperature, the presence of larger Cu0 particles
favours the FFA hydrogenolysis to 2-MF.
Fig. 4. Effectof thecatalyst activationtemperature onFFR liquid-phase hydrogenation over
CuNiMgAlOy. Conditions: 90 mL ethanol, 30 mL FFR, 1 MPa H2, 1 g catalyst activated for
2 h, stirring at 500 rmin−1, reaction at 200 °C for 2 h.
FFR conversion in the vapour-phase hydrogenation shows a trend
similar to that in the liquid-phase hydrogenation, it decreases. This
suggests that FFR hydrogenation is inhibited to some extent by the
agglomeration of the Cu particles. On the other hand, the selectivities
of FFA and 2-MF formation show an inverse trend. Clearly 300 °C is an
important break point at which there is change of the trends for FFA
and 2-MF selectivities: the FFA selectivity increases from 32% to 80%
and the 2-MF selectivity decreases from 48% to 10% between 300 °C
and 400 °C. The increase of the FFA selectivity and the decrease of the
2-MF selectivity with the increase of the activation temperature are
most probably due to the short contact time of FFR and FFA with the
catalytic active centers.
From the catalytic cycle results (Fig. 3S and 4S in the Supplemen-
tary material) of CuNiMgAlOy activated by H2 at 300 °C, it is shown
that the catalytic activity of CuNiMgAlOy has no obvious decrease after
3 cycles, and only about 10% decrease on the FFR conversion after 6
cycles in the FFR liquid-phase hydrogenation. And the catalytic
properties of CuNiMgAlOy in vapour-phase hydrogenation stay nearly
unchanged after 36 h. This indicates that CuNiMgAlOy from the
hydrotalcite-like precursors exhibits a stable catalytic performance in
FFR hydrogenation.
90
FFR conversion
80
From the FFR vapour-phase hydrogenation over CuNiMgAlOy
(Fig. 5), two other by-products including tetrahydrofurfuralcohol
(THFFA) and 2-methyltetrahydrofuran (2-MHF) are found besides the
two main products FFA and 2-MF. The two by-products result from
the hydrogenation of furan ring of FFA and 2-MF, respectively. When
the catalyst activation temperature is raised from 220 to 400 °C, the
FFA selectivity
2-MF selectivity
2-MHF selectivity
70
THFFA selectivity
60
50
40
30
20
10
Table 3
Catalytic performance of the different catalysts.a
Catalysts
FFR
Products distribution/mol%
conversion/
mol%
FFA
2-MF
2-dEMF
0
200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 380 400 420
MgAlOy
9.8
55.6
52.7
90.5
59.8
53.2
78.1
85.4
–
40.2
46.8
13.9
10.1
Activation temperature/oC
NiMgAlOy
CuMgAlOy
CuNiMgAlOy
–
8.0
4.7
Fig. 5. Effect of the catalyst activation temperature on FFA vapour-phase hydrogenation
over CuNiMgAlOy. Conditions: catalysts activated for 2 h, GHSV=4000 h−1, H2/FFR
molar ratio=10.1, reaction at 220 °C.
a
1 g catalyst activated by H2 at 300 °C for 2 h, 90 mL ethanol, 30 mL FFR, 1 MPa H2,
stirring at 500 rmin−1, reaction at 200 °C for 2 h.