S.V. Yanina, R.L. Smith / Journal of Catalysis 213 (2003) 151–162
161
layer to step/defect-controlled evaporation—could explain
the transition from small islands and pits of variable (b/4–
b/2) height (Fig. 3a) to uniform half-unit-cell (b/2) islands
(Figs. 4a and 4b) during treatments at 500 ◦C. Subsequently,
the half-unit-cell islands must in fact erode preferentially
from their bounding steps, since new surface pits are only
rarely observed at long exposures. The change in surface
morphology that accompanies the transition is probably
indicative of coarsening of the initial (transient) morphology
(∼ 2 h, Fig. 3a) to a lower energy configuration (∼ 72 h,
Fig. 4a).
The rarity of terrace etching in air–2.3% H2O indicates
that the vapor pressure of MoO3, which is related to the
vapor pressure of MoO2(OH)2, is sufficiently high so that
layer-by-layer evaporation is largely suppressed [40–45].
This behavior is somewhat counterintuitive because Mo
volatilizes more rapidly in air–2.3% H2O than in dry air, in-
dicating that the driving force (vapor undersaturation) for pit
nucleation should be greater in air–2.3% H2O. The differ-
ence could however be explained if H2O disproportionately
enhances the rate at which Mo can volatilize from steps com-
pared to terraces, for example by lowering the activation en-
ergy for desorption. Such a mechanism is consistent with
the fact that steps are etched in air–2.3% H2O at as low as
400 ◦C. Rapid volatilization from steps, defects (e.g., dislo-
cations), and the crystal edges as the samples are heated to
the treatment temperature could raise the pressure of MoO3
to the point that layer-by-layer evaporation is not feasible.
As the treatment temperature is increased, the vapor under-
saturation required for layer-by-layer evaporation should de-
crease, consistent with the increased occurrence of pits on
singular terraces in air–2.3% H2O at 600 ◦C.
(010) surfaces would be expected to be controlled by de-
fects, such as steps and oxygen vacancies.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Department of Materials
Science and Engineering of the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology (MIT). The authors gratefully acknowledge the
technical assistance of Mr. J. Chen, Mr. R. Li, and Ms. L.
Metzger and the use of the shared experimental facilities
of the National Science Foundation—Materials Research
Science and Engineering Center (NSF-MRSEC) at MIT.
References
[1] J. Haber, in: R. Grasselli, J. Brazdil (Eds.), Solid State Chemistry in
Catalysis, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1985, p. 1.
[2] D.A. Jefferson, J.M. Thomas, M.K. Uppal, R.K. Grasselli, J. Chem.
Soc. Chem. Commun. 594 (1983).
[3] A.W. Sleight, in: A.K. Cheetham, P. Day (Eds.), Solid State Chemistry
Compounds, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1992, p. 166.
[4] D.J. Buttrey, D.A. Jefferson, J.M. Thomas, Philos. Mag. A 53 (1986)
897.
[5] P.N. Rylander, in: J.R. Anderson, M. Boudart (Eds.), Catalysis Science
and Technology, Springer, New York, 1983, p. 2.
[6] T.P. Snyder, C.G. Hill Jr., Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng. 31 (1989) 43.
[7] N. Arora, G. Deo, I.E. Wachs, A.M. Hirt, J. Catal. 159 (1996) 1.
[8] T.P. Snyder, C.G. Hill Jr., J. Catal. 132 (1991) 536.
[9] M. Egashira, K. Matsuo, S. Kagawa, T. Seiyama, J. Catal. 58 (1979)
409.
[10] L.D. Krenzke, G.W. Keulks, J. Catal. 64 (1980) 295.
[11] J.F. Brazdil, D.D. Suresh, R.K. Grasselli, J. Catal. 66 (1980) 347.
[12] A.F. Van Den Elzen, G.D. Rieck, Acta Crystallogr. B 29 (1973) 2433.
[13] P.L. Gai, J. Solid State Chem. 49 (1983) 25.
Although there are differences in the manner in which
the Bi2Mo3O12(010) surface is etched in dry air and air–
2.3% H2O, the surface evolves to have similar morphologi-
cal characteristics in the two environments. For example, Mo
loss results in Bi enrichment and the development of Bi-rich
deposits. While steps on the cleavage surface are characteris-
tically straight, steps on treated surfaces are curved. Further-
more, steps are always an integer multiple of b/2 in height.
Terraces bounded by smaller steps, resulting either from
cleavage (Fig. 1b) or short exposu◦res at 500 ◦C (Fig. 3a), are
annealed out within 72 h at 500 C. Recalling the symme-
try and bonding arguments outlined with regard to cleavage
(Section 3.1), this points to a consistent Bi2Mo3O12(010)
termination. All the terraces on (010) will have the same
ideal termination, while those on (010) will be a mirror im-
age. We assume this is the same termination favored by 1/2–
1 cleavage (Fig. 2b), as it affords the lowest possible broken
bond density. Since Mo sites are generally thought to play a
role in reactant chemisorption on bismuth molybdates, it is
interesting to note that this terrace termination presents Mo
that are tetrahedrally coordinated by O and effectively bond
saturated. Hence, if coordinatively unsaturated Mo atoms are
required for chemisorption, the reactivities of the (010) and
[14] P.L. Gai, Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng. 34 (1992) 1.
[15] I. Matsuura, R. Schut, K. Hirakawa, J. Catal. 63 (1980) 152.
[16] D.A.G. Van Oeffelen, J.H.C. Van Hooff, G.C.A. Schuit, J. Catal. 95
(1985) 84.
[17] J. Kumar, E. Ruckenstein, J. Solid State Chem. 31 (1980) 41.
[18] D. Carson, G. Coundurier, M. Forissier, J.C. Vedrine, J. Chem. Soc.
Faraday Trans. 79 (1983) 1921.
[19] L.E. Briand, A.M. Hirt, I.E. Wachs, J. Catal. 202 (2001) 268.
[20] I.E. Wachs, Catal. Today 27 (1996) 437.
[21] C.-B. Wang, Y. Cai, I.E. Wachs, Langmuir 15 (1999) 1223.
[22] T. Millner, J. Neugebauer, Nature 163 (1949) 601.
[23] G.R. Belton, A.S. Jordan, J. Phys. Chem. 69 (1965) 2065.
[24] T. Lim, S.W. Weller, J. Catal. 108 (1987) 175.
[25] L. Zhang, D. Liu, B. Yang, J. Zhao, Appl. Catal. A Gen. 117 (1994)
163.
[26] M.K. Meyer, A.J. Thom, M. Akinc, Intermetallics 7 (1999) 153.
[27] M. Akinc, M.K. Meyer, M.J. Kramer, A.J. Thom, J.J. Huebsch, B.
Cook, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 261 (1999) 16.
[28] R.L. Smith, G.S. Rohrer, J. Catal. 163 (1996) 12.
[29] R.L. Smith, G.S. Rohrer, J. Catal. 180 (1998) 270.
[30] R.L. Smith, G.S. Rohrer, J. Catal. 184 (1999) 49.
[31] T. Chen, J. Cryst. Growth 20 (1973) 29.
[32] A. Grandin De l’eprevier, D.A. Payne, J. Cryst. Growth 51 (1981) 377.
[33] R.L. Smith, G.S. Rohrer, J. Solid State Chem. 124 (1996) 104.
[34] R.L. Smith, G.S. Rohrer, K.S. Lee, D.-K. Seo, M.-H. Whangbo, Surf.
Sci. 367 (1996) 87.
[35] G.S. Rohrer, W. Lu, R.L. Smith, A. Hutchinson, Surf. Sci. 292 (1993)
261.