J. Tois et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 46 (2005) 735–737
737
2. Ruchelman, A. L.; Singh, S. K.; Ray, A.; Wu, X. H.;
Yang, J.-M.; Li, T.-K.; Liu, A.; Liu, L. F.; LaVoie, E. J.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2003, 11, 2061–2073.
3. (a) Theeraladanon, C.; Arisawa, M.; Nishidi, A.; Nakag-
awa, M. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 3017–3035; (b) Nishida, A.;
Sorimachi, H.; Iwaida, M.; Matsumizu, M.; Kawate, T.;
Nakagawa, M. Synlett 1998, 389–390.
4. (a) Leach, C. A.; Brown, T. H.; Ife, R. J.; Keeling, D. J.;
Parsons, M. E.; Theobald, C. J.; Wiggald, K. J. J. Med.
Chem. 1995, 38, 2748; (b) Andrews, I. P.; Bannister, R.;
Etridge, S. K.; Lewis, N. J.; Mullane, M. V.; Wells, A. S.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 7743.
5. (a) Conrad, M.; Limpach, L. Chem. Ber. 1887, 20, 944; (b)
Riegel, B.; Lappin, G. R.; Adelson, B. H.; Jackson, R. I.;
Albisetti, C. J.; Dodson, R. M.; Baker, R. H. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1946, 68, 1264; (c) Chen, B. C.; Huang, X.;
proceeded smoothly affording the desired enamines and
4(1H)quinolones in high yields. In the case of 1c it is
noteworthy that the hydrogenation of the benzyl group
and the reductive cyclization took place in one pot to
give directly 3c. To demonstrate the efficiency and
advantages of this process we tested this transformation
with a mixture of acetophenones 1d as starting materi-
als.11 The mixture of enamines 2d was formed in the
same ratio as the starting materials. To our delight the
reductive cyclization went as expected. The 6-methoxy-
4(1H)quinolone was formed and no side reaction caused
by the reduction product of the ÔwrongÕ isomer was
observed.
We also tested if it would be possible to deoxygenate 2e
under these conditions to afford 3d. Traces of 3d were
detected on TLC but we were able to isolate only 3c.
´
Wang, J. Synthesis 1987, 482–483; (d) Gall-Istok, K.;
Sterk, L.; Deak, G. Acta Chim. Hung. 1983, 112, 241–
´
´
247.
6. (a) Huang, X.; Liu, Z. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 7655–
7657; (b) Huang, X.; Liu, Z. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 6731–
6737.
7. Atkins, R.; Breen, G. F.; Crawford, L. P.; Grinter, T. J.;
Harris, M. A.; Hayes, J. F.; Moores, C. J.; Saunders, R.
N.; Share, A. C.; Walsgrove, T. C.; Wicks, C. Org. Proc.
Res. Dev. 1997, 1, 185–197.
In summary, we have demonstrated that this Leimgruber–
Batcho analog is an extremely effective method for the
preparation of 4(1H)quinolones. Further modifications
of these synthesized molecules with asymmetric com-
pounds are now under investigation in our laboratories
and the results will be presented in due course.
8. Batcho, A. D.; Leimgruber, W. Org. Synth. 1985, 63, 214.
9. (a) Entwistle, I. D.; Johnstone, R. A. W.; Povall, T. J. J.
Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1975, 1300–1301; (b) Jackson,
A. E.; Johnstone, R. A. W. Synthesis 1976, 685–687.
10. A highly non-polar by-product was observed on TLC
when the catalyst:substrate ratio was 1:1. This side
product was not characterized.
Acknowledgements
This research is financially supported by the Finnish
National Technology Agency, TEKES.
11. Mixture 1d was prepared according to Robbins, R. J.;
Laman, D. M.; Falvey, D. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118,
8127–8135; We were not able to separate the isomers and
the ratio of 3-methoxy-2-nitroacetophenone:3-methoxy-4-
nitro-acetophenone (56:44) was determined by NMR
spectrometry. We highly recommend the method pub-
References and notes
1. We will use this name throughout the text. In most
published articles the tautomeric form 4-hydroxyquinoline
is used. For discussion of the keto–enol tautomerism see,
lished by Furstner et al. for the preparation of pure
¨
3-methoxy-2-nitroacetophenone. Furstner, A.; Jumbam,
¨
D. N.; Seidel, G. Chem. Ber. 1994, 127, 1125–1130.
´
Cruz, A.; Elguero, J.; Goya, P.; Martınez, A. Tetrahedron
1992, 48, 6135–6150, and references cited therein.