1170
K. B. Sidhpuria et al.
References
It is reported that during secondary alcohol dehydration,
alcohol molecule first gets adsorbed on the surface of metal
oxide catalysts followed by a two-step mechanism
involving intermediate carbocation formation (E1), a con-
certed pathway (E2) or via carbanion formation mechanism
(E1cB), which resulted into the different products such as
1-alkene, 2-alkene etc. [31, 33]. E1cB mechanism favors
the formation of 1-alkene (Hofmann projection), while E1
and concerted E2 mechanisms result into 2-alkene (Say-
tzeff projection) as a major product. The results of the
present study showed that sulfated xerogels and aerogels
samples formed 4-methyl-1-pentene in the range of
67–75% and 36–42%, respectively. Additionally, the sig-
nificant formation of 4-methyl-2-pentene (12–27%) and
slight formation of 4-methyl-2-pentanone (5–7%) is
observed. However, it is difficult to unambiguously
comment on the operating mechanism based on the data
collected in the present study.
1. Tanabe K (1985) Mater Chem Phys 13:347
2. Wu NL, Wang SY, Rusakova IA (1999) Science 285:1375
3. Anderson JA, Fergusson C, Rodriguez-Ramos I, Guerrero-Ruiz A
(2000) J Catal 192:344
4. Courty P, Marcilly C, Delmon B, Jacobs PA, Poncelet G (eds)
(1976) Preparation of catalysts. Elsevier Press, Amsterdam, p 119
5. Yang H, Lu R, Shen L, Song L, Zhao J, Wang Z, Wang L (2003)
Mater Lett 57:2572
´
6. Rodrıguez Avendan˜o RG, De Los Reyes JA, Viveros T, Montoya
De La Fuente JA (2009) Catal Today 148:12
7. Tanabe K, Misono M, Ono Y, Hattori H (1989) In: Delmon B,
Yates JT (eds) Studies in surface science and catalysis, vol. 51.
Elsevier, Amsterdam
8. Gervasini A, Carniti P, Auroux A (2005) Thermochimica Acta
434:42
9. Wu Z, Zhao Y, Liu D (2004) Microporous Mesoporous Mater
68:127
10. Azambre B, Zenboury L, Weber JV, Burg P (2010) Appl Surf Sci
256:4570
11. Akkari R, Ghorbel A, Essayem N, Figueras F (2007) Appl Catal
A 328:43
12. Zhang Y, Pan L, Gao C, Wang Y, Zhao Y (2010) J Sol Gel Sci
Technol 56:27
13. Tyagi B, Sidhpuria KB, Shaik B, Jasra RV (2010) J Porous Mater
17:699
14. Jung SM, Dupont O, Grange R (2001) Appl Catal A 208:393
4 Conclusions
Sulfated and non-sulfated ZrO2–SiO2 mixed xerogel and
aerogel samples having varied Zr/Si molar ratios were
evaluated as heterogeneous acid catalysts for solvent free
isomerization of a-pinene and dehydration of 4-methyl-
2-pentanol. Sulfated samples showed significant enhance-
ment in the catalytic activity for both the reactions studied.
Sulfated samples exhibited higher conversion of a-pinene
(86–98%) compared to non-sulfated samples; however, the
selectivity for camphene and limonene were comparable or
slightly lower indicating that the formation of camphene
and limonene requires moderate acidity. The results clearly
suggested that the acidity of the catalyst and the selectivity
for the desired products can be tunable with ZrO2–SiO2
mixed oxides as compared to pure metal oxides. The cor-
relation with cyclohexanol dehydration showed that isom-
erization of a-pinene is a Brønsted acid catalyzed reaction.
For 4-methyl-2-pentanol dehydration, ZrO2–SiO2 mixed
xerogel and aerogel catalysts resulted into lower conver-
sion (4–35%); sulfated xerogel samples showed higher
conversion and selectivity for 4-methyl-1-pentene com-
pared to sulfated aerogel samples. The correlation of
4-methyl-2-pentanol conversion with acid site density and
sulfur per unit area was found to be linear, which suggested
that higher surface acidity is required to achieve significant
conversion of 4-methyl-2-pentanol as well as for higher
selectivity for the desired product, i.e., 4-methyl-1-pentene.
¨
15. Akpolat O, Gu¨ndu¨z G, Ozkan F, Bes¸u¨n N (2004) Appl Catal A
265:11
16. McGraw GW, Hemingway RW, Ingram LL Jr, Canady CS,
McGraw WB (1999) Environ Sci Technol 33:4029
´
´
17. Chimal-Valencia O, Robau-Sanchez A, Collins-Martınez V,
´
Aguilar-Elguezabal A (2004) Bioresour Technol 93:119
¨
18. Besu¨n N, Ozkan F, Gu¨ndu¨z G (2002) Appl Catal A 224:285
19. Roberge DM, Buhl D, Niederer JP, Holderich W (2001) Appl
Catal A 215:111
20. Yadav MK, Chudasama CD, Jasra RV (2004) J Mol Catal A
216:51
21. Allahverdiev A, Irandoust S, Murzin DY (1999) J Catal 185:352
´
´
22. Lopez C, Machado F, Rodrıguez K, Arias D, Mendez B,
Hasegawa M (1999) Catal Lett 62:221
23. Encormier MA, Wilson K, Lee AF (2003) J Catal 215:57
24. Grzona LM, Comelli NA, Masini O, Ponzi EN, Ponzi M (2000)
React Kinet Catal Lett 69:271
25. Ecormier MA, Lee AF, Wilson K (2005) Microporous Meso-
porous Mater 80:301
26. Linnekoski JA, Krause AOI, Holmen A, Kjetsa M, Moljord K
(1998) Appl Catal A 174:1
´
´ ´
27. Manrıquez ME, Lopez T, Gomez R, Navarrete J (2004) J Mol
Catal A 220:229
´
28. Corma A, Fornes V, Rey F (1994) J Catal 148:205
29. Berteau P, Delmon B, Dallons JL, van Gysel A (1991) Appl Catal
70:307
30. Cutrufello MG, Ferino I, Solinas V, Primavera A, Trovarelli A,
Auroux A, Picciau C (1999) Phys Chem Chem Phys 1:3369
31. Ferino I, Casula MF, Corrias A, Cutrufello MG, Monaci R,
Paschina G (2000) Phys Chem Chem Phys 2:1847
32. Sidhpuria KB, Parikh PA, Bahadur P, Tyagi B, Jasra RV (2009)
Catal Today 141:12
33. Winterbottom JM (1981) In: Kemball C (ed) Catalysis (specialist
periodical reports) vol 4. The Chemical Society, London, 141
Acknowledgments Authors are thankful to CSIR Network Pro-
gramme on Catalysis and Analytical Science Discipline for providing
instrumental analysis. KBS is further thankful to FCT (SFRH/BPD/
44803/2008).
123