Table 2 Michaelis–Menten kinetic parameters of P450BM3-catalysed
di-oxygenated or di-hydroxylated products, accounting for a
further 25%. Further investigations did not resolve whether
these four products came from subsequent enzyme-catalysed
reactions or non-enzyme-catalysed epoxide ring opening under
the reaction conditions. Instead, attention was focussed on the
mono-oxygenated product. The reaction product with a mass
of M + 16 was conclusively identified as 15,16-epoxyoctadeca-
9,12-dienoic acid 2 based on the following data:
fatty acid oxidation
Entry
k
cat/min−1
Km/lM
kcat : Km/min−1 lM−1
Linolenic acid 1
3126 226 24
6
130
875
Eicosapentaenoic acid 1400 20 1.6 0.5a
Arachidonic acid
3200 40 1.2 0.1a 2666
a Given as spectral binding constant, Ks.
(i) Direct comparison of the 1H NMR spectra of the product
with that of linolenic acid revealed that the mono-epoxide had
been formed with the oxygen atom nearest the terminal position
of the linolenic acid chain. The triplet signal of the methyl
protons shifted from 0.99 ppm in linolenic acid 1 to 1.12 ppm in
the epoxide 2, due to the inductive effect of the adjacent oxygen
on the epoxy ring.
of oxidation must depend in some subtle way upon the way in
which the substrate binds at the active site and orients itself
towards oxidation.
The optical purity of the epoxide 2 obtained from P450BM3
-
catalysed oxidation of 1 was determined by initial conversion
to the methyl ester followed by HPLC analysis (Chiralcel OJ-
H, Diacel) using a racemic sample for comparison. HPLC
analysis indicated that the product had an enantiomeric excess
of 60%. The absolute configuration of 2 was tentatively assigned
as 15(R),16(S)-epoxyoctadeca-9,12-dienoic acid by direct com-
parison with published14 data for linoleic acid in the absence
of available data for linolenic acid. Thus it was assumed that
the order of elution of the 15(R),16(S)-enantiomer of linolenic
acid was the same as for linoleic, using the identical chiral
HPLC column, in which the methyl ester of 15(S),16(R)-
epoxyoctadeca-9,12-dienoic acid eluted first (9.2 min) followed
by 15(R),16(S)-epoxyoctadeca-9,12-dienoic acid (10.4 min).
The Michaelis–Menten kinetic parameters (kcat and Km) for
the oxidation of linolenic acid 1 were determined (Table 2)
using NADPH turnover rates and were compared with the
corresponding values for eicosapentaenoic acid and arachidonic
acid. The kcat of P450BM3 towards linolenic acid is comparable
to arachidonic acid, the best substrate known for the enzyme to
date.
In conclusion, we have shown that cytochrome P450BM3 can be
used for the preparative synthesis of enantiomerically enriched
epoxy-linolenic acid 2. Under the reaction conditions, the en-
zyme showed complete regio- and moderate enantio-selectivity
together with a very high turnover number, allowing the isolation
of epoxy-linolenic acid. This work, together with the report of
the oxidation of arachidonic acid,12 demonstrates the general
potential of cytochrome P450BM3 for selective oxidation of long
chain unsaturated fatty acids.
(ii) Co-elution and spectral comparison by GC–MS with au-
thentic standards which were prepared using chemical methods
(before carrying out the chemical epoxidation, linolenic acid
was converted to the methyl ester in methanol and catalytic
hydrochloric acid in order to analyse it by GC–MS). GC–
MS analyses revealed three mono-epoxy linolenic acids with
reasonably resolved peaks having retention times of 15.26, 15.30
and 15.34 min.
The distribution of products in cytochrome P450BM3-catalysed
oxidation of saturated and unsaturated fatty acids is mainly
dependent upon two factors, namely (i) the inherent reactivity
=
of the C–H/C C bonds, and (ii) the optimal orientation of
=
the C–H/C C bond with respect to the haem-bound reactive
oxygen intermediate. Hydroxylation of the saturated fatty acid
palmitic acid by cytochrome P450BM3 occurs preferentially at
the x-2 position along with substantial reaction at the x-1
and x-3 carbon atoms.13 In the case of unsaturated fatty acids
(Scheme 1) P450BM3 has been reported to catalyse both the
hydroxylation and epoxidation of arachidionic acid 3 yielding
18-hydroxyarachidonic acid and 14,15-epoxyarachidonic acid in
80 and 20% yields respectively).12 In contrast, with linolenic acid
we have observed exclusive epoxidation at the C-15,16-double
bond with no other detectable mono-hydroxylation products
under the experimental conditions. It is interesting to note that
similarly high levels of regioselectivity were observed in the
P450BM3-catalysed oxidation of linoleic acid14 although in this
case the exclusive product was the C-12,13-epoxy compound.
Thus for reasons that are not entirely clear, the site and nature
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Biological and Biotechnology
Science Research Council (A. C.). We also acknowledge the
Wellcome Trust for financial support and Dr Gareth Roberts
for his comments on the manuscript.
Notes and references
1 M. Muller, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 2004, 15, 591; K. Faber and W.
Kroutil, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 2005, 9, 181; S. Serra, C. Fuganti
and E. Brenna, TIBTECH, 2005, 23, 193.
2 P. C. Cirino and F. H. Arnold, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 2002, 6, 130;
V. Urlacher and R. D. Schmid, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 2002, 13, 557;
D. F. V. Lewis and A. Wiseman, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 2005, 36,
377.
3 M. Katagiri, B. N. Ganguli and I. C. Gunsalus, J. Biol. Chem., 1968,
243, 3543; R. Raag, H. Li, B. C. Jones and T. L. Poulos, Biochem. J.,
1993, 32, 4571.
4 J. P. Jones, E. J. O’Hare and L. L. Wong, Eur. J. Biochem., 2001, 268,
1460; S. G. Bell, R. J. Sowden and L. L. Wong, Chem. Commun.,
2001, 635.
5 Y. Miura and A. J. Fulco, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1975, 388, 305;
P. P. Ho and A. J. Fulco, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1976, 431, 249; A. J.
Fulco, Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol., 1991, 31, 177.
6 Cytochrome P450: Structure, Mechanism and Biochemistry, P. R.
Ortiz de Montellano, ed., Plenum, New York, 1986.
Scheme 1 Product distribution from cytochrome P450BM3-catalysed
oxidation of arachidonic acid 3, linoleic acid 4, and linolenic acid 1.
O r g . B i o m o l . C h e m . , 2 0 0 5 , 3 , 2 6 8 8 – 2 6 9 0
2 6 8 9