Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.PDF. Copyright 2002-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd.
Full Papers
group at pH 8.0 and 7.1, respectively, after incubation at 378C
for 2 h, indicating that NBD/mAb ratios of conjugations per-
formed at pH 8.0 are a slight underestimation (data not
shown).
of salt type on the reaction of monovalent platinum(II) com-
plexes with proteins has never been reported.
To investigate this in greater detail, complex 1 in water
(Milli-Q) was reacted with trastuzumab in tricine buffer in the
presence of a variety of salts (Table 2). Notably, trastuzumab is
Effect of buffer and pH on conjugation efficiency
To explore the effect of pH and buffer on the reaction of com-
plex 1 with trastuzumab, reactions were performed in three
different buffers: MES, HEPES, and tricine, at pH 5.8–8.0 with
overlapping pH ranges to discriminate between buffer and pH
effects. As shown in Table 1, a clear pH effect was observed,
Table 2. Conjugation of complex 1 to trastuzumab: effect of added salt
on conjugation efficiency.[a]
Salt
Conc. [mm]
NBD/mAb[b]
2.7
5.1
3.1
–
–
30
30
Na2SO4
NaOAc
NaCl
6.5
2.8
Table 1. Conjugation of complex 1 to trastuzumab: effect of buffer and
pH on conjugation efficiency.[a]
NaCl
NaNO3
NaClO4
NaCl/NaNO3
NaCl/NaClO4
NaCl/Na2SO4
30
30
30
6.5/30
6.5/30
6.5/30
3.2
3.6 (3.5/3.7)[b]
4.1 (3.6/2.6)[b]
3.1
3.7
4.1
Buffer
pH[c]
NBD/mAb
Buffer
Observed
MES
MES
HEPES
HEPES
HEPES
tricine
tricine+thiourea[b]
5.5
6.4
6.5
7.5
8.5
8.5
8.5
5.8
ND
6.3
7.1
ND
8.0
ND
1.3
1.8
1.7
2.5
2.8
2.8
0.1
[a] Reagents and conditions: trastuzumab 83.1 mm, complex 1 (20 equiv),
tricine (8 mm, pH 8.5), 378C, 2 h. [b] Salt concentration: 60/120 mm.
formulated in a histidine buffer which typically results in a mini-
mum chloride concentration of ~0.9 mm for the conjugation
reactions listed in Table 2. Interestingly, the salt type proved to
have a pronounced effect on the NBD/mAb ratio obtained.
Whereas addition of NaCl and NaOAc only showed a modest
increase at 30 mm, NaNO3, NaClO4, and especially Na2SO4
showed a substantially higher NBD/mAb ratio. Increasing the
salt concentration to 60 and 120 mm was ineffective for
NaNO3, whereas a strong decrease was observed for NaClO4 at
[a] Reagents and conditions: trastuzumab 83.1 mm, complex 1 (20 equiv),
buffer (8 mm), NaCl (6.5 mm), 378C, 2 h. [b] Conjugation in the presence
of thiourea (10 mm). [c] pH measured at the start of reaction at 208C.
with higher NBD/mAb ratios observed at higher pH. Because
coordination of platinum(II) to sulfur donors such as methio-
nine and disulfides is believed to be relatively insensitive to
pH, this trend implies that histidine groups, with pKa values
typically in the range of 5.5–7.5,[12] are likely involved in bind-
ing to complex 1.
2À
120 mm. The effect of NO3À, ClO4À, and SO4 was somewhat
diminished when the ClÀ concentration was increased to
6.5 mm.
MES and HEPES buffers reportedly show negligible metal
binding, whereas tricine does show some affinity for metals,
The significant differences between the various salts are not
easily explained if only the interaction of the salt with the plati-
num complex is considered. Apparently, at the concentrations
used, none of the salts tested interfere with the binding of
complex 1 to trastuzumab, as the reaction is least efficient
when no salt is added. One could speculate that certain salts
could protect the platinum complex from aquation, which at
pH 8.0 is expected to result in deprotonation of the water
ligand ([Pt(dien)(H2O)]; pKa =6.0)[19c] to give an unreactive hy-
droxide complex. It is, however, well known that in contrast to
such as Cu2+ [13]
Comparison of overlapping pH ranges for
.
these three buffers, however, showed no significant difference
in the number of NBD groups introduced. To exclude binding
of complex 1 to trastuzumab via pathways not mediated by
platinum(II), the reaction was also performed in the presence
of thiourea, an excellent ligand for platinum(II). These condi-
tions effectively inhibited the conjugation reaction for complex
1, indicating that binding is indeed platinum mediated. Reac-
tion conditions with pH>8.0 were not explored due to the un-
stable nature of the NBD group under basic conditions.
À
À
NO3 and SO42À, ClO4 does not coordinate to platinum(II).[14]
An intriguing and more likely alternative to explain the dif-
ference in conjugation efficiency is the interaction of the salt
with the protein. Recently, Weis and co-workers[15] reported on
the effect of Hofmeister series salts on the local flexibility of an
IgG1 monoclonal antibody, as measured by hydrogen/deuteri-
um exchange coupled to mass spectrometry. Compared with
Effect of salt on conjugation efficiency
Both organic and inorganic salts are routinely used in buffers
and as stabilizers in antibody formulation. Depending on salt
type and concentration, their presence could significantly
impact the efficiency of the conjugation reaction. In previous
studies,[4a,g–j] NaNO3 was often employed in conjugation reac-
tions of platinum-based linkers with lysozyme or albumin.
However, to the best of our knowledge, a study on the effect
2À
ClÀ (0.1m), both SO4 and SCNÀ were found to increase the
flexibility of a model IgG1 at 0.5m, albeit not necessarily in the
same areas. At 0.5m, ClÀ was found to induce an overall de-
crease in flexibility of IgG1. Zhang-van Enk et al. recently
ChemMedChem 2015, 10, 797 – 803
799
ꢁ 2015 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim