Brief Articles
J ournal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2001, Vol. 44, No. 16 2669
methanol, NR-tert-butoxycarbonyl-1,2-ethanediamine (12, n )
1; 184 µL, 1 mmol) and 3 Å molecular sieves were added, and
the mixture was stirred at room temperature. After being
stirred for 1 h, the reaction mixture was treated with sodium
triacetoxyborohydride (334.6 mg, 1.5 mmol) and stirred over-
night. The reaction mixture was filtered, and the filtrate was
concentrated in vacuo. The residue was purified by flash
column chromatography on silica gel (EtOAc/MeOH ) 1:1) to
afford 13a (201 mg, 45%) as a pale-yellow solid: 1H NMR (500
MHz, CD3OD) δ 3.67 (m, 1H), 3.33 (m, 2H), 3.04-3.20 (m, 2H),
2.62-2.73 (m, 4H), 1.52-1.75 (m, 4H), 1.45 (brs, 18H).
(4S)-4-N-ter t-Bu t oxyca r b on yla m in o-5-(2-[N-ter t-b u -
toxyca r bon yla m in op r op yl]a m in op en tyl]-N′-n itr ogu a n i-
d in e (13b). This compound (234 mg, 51%) was prepared as
described above using NR-tert-butoxycarbonyl-1,3-propanedi-
amine (12b, n ) 2): 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.90 (m,
1H), 3.69 (m, 1H), 3.18-3.21 (m, 4H), 2.77(m, 2H), 2.64 (m,
2H), 1.50-1.65 (m, 6H), 1.44 (brs, 18H).
(4S)-4-N-ter t-Bu t oxyca r b on yla m in o-5-(2-[N-ter t-b u -
t oxyca r b on yla m in ob u t yl]a m in op en t yl]-N′-n it r ogu a n i-
d in e (13c). This compound (265 mg, 56%) was prepared as
described above using NR-tert-butoxycarbonyl-1,4-butanedi-
amine: 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.67 (m, 1H), 3.71 (m,
1H), 3.14 (m, 4H), 2.72 (t, 2H, J ) 6.0), 2.64 (m, 2H), 1.71 (m,
2H), 1.49-1.54 (m, 8H), 1.45 (brs, 18H).
(4S)-N-(4-Am in o-5-[a m in oet h yl]a m in op en t yl)-N′-n i-
tr ogu a n id in e (7). Compound 13a (201 mg, 0.45 mmol) was
treated with 10 mL of trifluoroacetic acid/CH2Cl2 (1:1 v/v) for
30 min. Excess TFA and solvent were removed by evaporation.
The residue was dissolved in a small amount of water, and
the mixture was washed with ether and lyophilized to give a
pale-yellow foam (110 mg, 99%): 1H NMR (500 MHz, D2O) δ
3.63 (m, 1H), 3.32-3.39 (m, 6H), 3.24 (m, 2H), 1.69-1.78 (m,
4H). HRMS (M + 1) calcd for C8H21N7O2 248.183, found
248.180. Anal. (C8H21N7O2‚3TFA‚2H2O) C, H, N.
(4S)-N-(4-Am in o-5-[a m in op r op yl]a m in op en t yl)-N′-n i-
tr ogu a n id in e (8). This compound was prepared as described
above using compound 13b: 1H NMR (500 MHz, D2O) δ 3.62
(m, 1H), 3.32 (m, 2H), 3.24 (m, 2H), 3.13 (m, 2H), 3.01 (m,
2H), 2.03 (quin, 2H, J ) 7.0), 1.69-1.78 (m, 4H). HRMS (M
+ 1) calcd for C9H23N7O2 262.199, found 262.195. Anal.
(C9H23N7O2‚3TFA‚2H2O) C, H, N.
(4S)-N-(4-Am in o-5-[a m in ob u t yl]a m in op en t yl)-N′-n i-
tr ogu a n id in e (9). This compound was prepared as described
above using compound 13c: 1H NMR (500 MHz, D2O) δ 3.75
(m, 1H), 3.62 (m, 2H), 3.32 (m, 2H), 3.24 (m, 2H), 2.94 (m,
2H), 1.67-1.82 (m, 8H). HRMS (M + 1) calcd for C10H25N7O2:
276.214, found 276.214. Anal. (C10H25N7O2‚3TFA‚2H2O) C,
H, N.
En zym e a n d Assa y. All of the NOS isoforms used were
recombinant enzymes overexpressed in E. coli from different
sources; there is very high sequence identity for the isoforms
from different sources. The murine macrophage iNOS was
expressed and isolated according to the procedure of Hevel et
al.25 The rat nNOS was expressed26 and purified as described.27
The bovine eNOS was isolated as reported.28 Nitric oxide
formation from NOS was monitored by the hemoglobin capture
assay as described.29
Deter m in a tion of Ki Va lu es. The apparent Ki values were
obtained by measuring percent inhibition in the presence of
10 µM L-arginine with at least three concentrations of inhibi-
tor. The parameters of the following inhibition equation30 were
fitted to the initial velocity data: % inhibition ) 100[I]/{[I] +
Ki (1 +[S]/Km)}. Km values for L-arginine were 1.3 µM (nNOS),
8.2 µM (iNOS), and 1.7 µM (eNOS). The selectivity of an
inhibitor was defined as the ratio of the respective Ki values.
When the data for 7-9 are compared with those for
4-6 to see the intrinsic effect of deletion of the amide
carbonyl group, it is apparent that the potency on nNOS
and iNOS is about the same or increased a little, but
the potency with eNOS has greatly decreased. In
particular, the large increase in selectivity for nNOS
over eNOS by 7 comes from a 4.5-fold increase in
potency for nNOS and a 1.5-fold decrease in potency for
eNOS. For 8 and 9 this selectivity increase is driven
more by large decreases in potency for eNOS (2.5-fold
and almost 6-fold, respectively). Therefore, the selectiv-
ity for nNOS over eNOS is significantly increased for
7-9, which implies that the carbonyl moiety of the
amide bond might not be necessary for its activity
toward nNOS and iNOS but that the rigid -CO-NH-
group interacts better with the active site of eNOS than
the reduced, flexible -CH2-NH- group. The difference
may also be the result of the nonbasic amide nitrogen
becoming basic when reduced to the corresponding
amine, which may not bind as well to eNOS.
In conclusion, the reduced amide bond analogues 7-9
show potencies similar to that of nNOS but greatly
increased selectivities over eNOS and iNOS. Therefore,
the reduced amide bond peptidomimetics are significant
surrogates for the dipeptide inhibitors of nNOS, and this
should facilitate further development of potent and
selective inhibitors for NOS.
Exp er im en ta l Section
Gen er a l Meth od s. NOS assays were recorded on a Perkin-
Elmer Lambda 10 UV/vis spectrophotometer. 1H NMR spectra
were recorded on a Varian Inova 500 MHz NMR spectrometer.
Chemical shifts are reported as δ values in parts per million
downfield from TMS (δ 0.00) as the internal standard in
CDCl3. For samples run in D2O, the HOD resonance was
arbitrarily set at 4.80 ppm. An Orion Research model 701 pH
meter with a general combination electrode was used for pH
measurements. Electrospray mass spectra were obtained on
a Micromass Quattro II spectrometer. Elemental analyses
were obtained by Oneida Research Services, Inc., Whiteboro,
NY. Thin-layer chromatography was carried out on E. Merck
precoated silica gel 60 F254 plates. Amino acids were visualized
with a ninhydrin spray reagent or a UV/vis lamp. E. Merck
silica gel 60 (230-400 mesh) was used for flash column
chromatography.
Rea gen ts a n d Ma ter ia ls. Amino acids were purchased
from Advanced ChemTech, Inc. NADPH, calmodulin, and
human ferrous hemoglobin were obtained from Sigma Chemi-
cal Co. Tetrahydrobiopterin (H4B) was purchased from Alexis
Biochemicals. HEPES, DTT, and conventional organic solvents
were purchased from Fisher Scientific. All other chemicals
were purchased from Aldrich unless otherwise stated.
Nr-(ter t-Bu toxyca r bon yl)-L-n itr oa r gin in e N-Meth yl-O-
m eth ylca r boxa m id e (10). This compound was prepared from
12.8 g (40.1 mmol) of NR-(tert-butoxycarbonyl)-L-nitroarginine
as described in ref 21 except that isobutyl chloroformate was
used instead of methyl chloroformate. The residue was further
evacuated on an oil pump to give a white solid product (12.9
g, 89%): 1H NMR δ 5.65 (d, 1H, N-H, J ) 9.0), 4.69 (t, 1H, J
) 9.0), 3.79 and 3.73 (s, 3H), 3.25 and 3.10 (s, 3H), 3.64 (m,
1H), 3.32 (m, 1H), 1.79 (m, 2H), 1.63 (m, 2H), 1.47 (s, 9H).
Nr-(ter t-Bu toxyca r bon yl)-L-n itr oa r gin in a l (11). This
compound was prepared according to the method in ref 22.
From 3.62 g of 10 (10 mmol), the white powder product 2.17 g
(72%) was obtained, and it was stored in a deep freezer (-80
Ack n ow led gm en t. The authors are grateful to the
National Institutes of Health (Grant GM49725) for
financial support of this research.
1
°C) prior to use. H NMR showed that 11 is a mixture of the
free aldehyde and cyclized hemiaminal.22
Refer en ces
(4S)-4-N-ter t-Bu t oxyca r b on yla m in o-5-(2-[N-ter t-b u -
t oxyca r b on yla m in oet h yl]a m in op en t yl]-N′-n it r ogu a n i-
d in e (13a ). To a solution of 11 (303 mg, 1 mmol) in dry
(1) Kerwin, J . F., J r.; Lancaster, J . R., J r. Nitric Oxide, A New
Paradigm for Second Messengers. Med. Res. Rev. 1994, 14, 23-
74.