Angewandte
Chemie
Scheme 2. One-pot cyclodehydration/oxidation sequence. Reagents and conditions: a) Deoxo-Fluor (1.1 equiv), CH2Cl2 (0.37 m), À208C, 10 min.
b) add BrCCl3, (2.5 equiv), DBU (3.2 equiv) and additives (see Table 1) at RT, 3–4 h. Deoxo-Fluor = bis(2-methoxyethyl)aminosulfur trifluoride,
DBU = 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene.
Table 1: Effects of protocol and additives on the synthesis of 12 from 10
(Scheme 2).
posing via retro-addition. It was unclear how this might occur,
although there was precedent for DBU reducing CCl4 via
single-electron transfers.[20] Along those lines, mixing equi-
molar amounts of BrCCl3 and DBU produced brominated
bicycle 13 and chloroform (1:1, 52% conversion after 1 h at
RT, see Scheme 3A). We discovered that Galvin Coppingerꢀs
radical[21] inhibited this reaction. In turn, 5 mol% of Galvin-
oxyl added together with BrCCl3 and DBU to crude solutions
of 11 improved the synthesis of 12 from 10 by eliminating the
+ 30 Da contaminant.[22] A second by-product accompanying
12 was a composite of 11 and DBU. Its structure was assigned
as spiroaminals 14 following X-ray crystallographic analysis
of congener 15 (see Scheme 3B and the Supporting Informa-
tion). Mechanistic details notwithstanding,[23] 14 was thought
to derive from DBU being oxidized with BrCCl3, not unlike
the + 30 Da contaminant discussed above. Galvinoxyl sup-
pressed formation of 14 and this benefit increased when
a portion of the DBU in the oxidation mixture was replaced
with Na2CO3. Combined, these two modifications more than
doubled the yield of 12 (Table 1, entry 5). For the synthesis of
Entry
Additive
Galvinoxyl (mol%)
Yield of 12 [%]
1
2
3
4
5
none
none
none
MgO[b]
0
0
5
5
5
31[a]
38
50
38
64
[b]
Na2CO3
[a] Stepwise yield (90 g scale). [b] 2.2 equiv (2.5 equiv DBU used).
route to DZ-2384 wherein electrolytic macrocyclization can,
in fact, be the final step in the process.
Our intent was to assemble DZ-2384 outwardly from
a
central dipeptide, namely tert-Leu-5-F-Trp-OH (9,
Scheme 1). Peptide 9 can be prepared in three steps from 5-
fluorotryptophan.[12] However, a four-step route proved more
cost effective. In that case, l-tert-leucine was acylated with
ClCO2Bn and the product was coupled to l-serine methyl
ester. After saponification with aq. LiOH, 7 was condensed
with 5-fluoroindole in the presence of Ac2O to afford
dipeptide 9. The overall yield of 9 from l-tert-leucine was
62% on kilogram scales. Compound 9 was isolated as an
inconsequential mixture of diastereomers; consistent with in
1
situ H NMR analyses by Yokoyama et al.[16] These authors
identified methylidene oxazolones (i.e. 8) as intermediates in
closely related reactions.
Coupling of 9 to l-serine methyl ester provided a tripep-
tide that was then incrementally oxidized, first with DDQ to
afford a single isomer of 3-(5-oxazolyl)indole 10.[17] Following
dessication of crude 10 with Deoxo-Fluor, the resultant
oxazoline (11) was further oxidized using a combination of
BrCCl3 and DBU.[18] This process proved interesting. The
dehydration step was uneventful. Oxazoline 11 could be
cleanly isolated. However, subsequent treatment with
BrCCl3/DBU gave bis-oxazole 12 in poor yield (25–35%
from 10, see Scheme 2 and Table 1, entry 1).
In an attempt to minimize handling, we implemented
Wipf and Williamsꢀ streamlined protocol.[19] Unmodified, this
one-pot procedure did little to improve yield (Table 1,
entry 2). Full conversion at a useful rate in the oxidation
step required 3 equiv of DBU. Significant by-products
accompanied formation of 12 under those conditions. One
of these was a compound 30 Da greater in mass than 12 that
degraded to 12 upon attempted isolation. It was as if 12 had
reacted with a formaldehyde synthon in situ, leading to
a hydroxymethylated adduct upon workup that was decom-
Scheme 3. Insights into the one-pot cyclodehydration/oxidation
sequence depicted in Scheme 2. Thermal ellipsoids drawn at 50%
probability.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 1 – 6
ꢀ 2015 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
3
These are not the final page numbers!