D.J. Awad et al. / Inorganica Chimica Acta 363 (2010) 1488–1494
1489
2.2. Preparation of the dichlorophenanthroline complexes of
2.4. Methods
[M(phen)Cl2] type (general procedure)
EPR spectra were recorded at 9.4 GHz (X-band) with a Bruker
CW Elexsys E500 spectrometer as powders. The Q-band spectra
were recorded at ꢂ36 GHz with a Bruker EMX spectrometer at
295 K. The spectra were simulated with the experimental parame-
ters using the program WIN-Simfonia [16].
The program CACAO (Computer Aided Composition of Atomic
Orbitals) by Mealli and Proserpio [17] has been used for the EHT
calculations (Extented Hückel Theory). For the DFT-Calculations
the program package GAUSSIAN 03 and the basis set B3LYP/6-31G*
was applied [18].
IR-Spectra were recorded on a Perkin–Elmer type 16 PC FT-IR
spectrophotometer in the region between 4000 and 400 cmꢁ1 as
KBr-pellets (reference KBr).
The magnetic susceptibilities of the synthesized complexes
were measured with Gouy method using a magnetic balance type
MSB-Auto (Sherwood Scientific Ltd.).
Metal-1,10-phenanthroline-dichloro complexes were synthe-
sized according to the method described by Jäger and van Dijk
[14]. An ethanolic solution of 1,10-phenanthroline was added
slowly to a well stirred warm ethanolic solution of the appropriate
metal chloride (MCl2 Å nH2O) (M = Ni, Cu, Zn) or the appropriate
bis(acetonitrile)dichloro complex [(AN)2PdCl2] or tetrachloroplati-
nate(II) complex [PtCl4]2ꢁ. After 1 h the reaction mixture was al-
lowed to cool to room temperature. The micro crystalline
products were filtered off, washed with ethanol and dried in vac-
uum. For the platinum complex the method was slightly modified:
water with some drops of HCl was used as solvent and the mixture
was refluxed for 1 day [15]. These 1,10-dichlorophenanthroline
metal(II) complexes were directly used for the synthesis of the
dithiolate complexes without further purification.
2.3. Preparation of the phenanthroline-dithiolate complexes
[M(phen)(dto)] and [M(phen)(dtsq)] (general procedure)
Diffraction data were collected at 210 K on a STOE Imaging Plate
Diffraction System IPDS-II using graphite monochromatized Mo K
a
radiation (k = 0.71 073 Å). The data were corrected by a spherical
absorption correction using the program X-Area (STOE, 2004) as
well as for Lorentz, polarization and extinction effects. The solution
of the crystal structure was performed using the program SHELXS-97
by direct methods (Sheldrick, 1997) [19], and refined using the
program SHELXL-97 (Sheldrick, 1997) [20]. All non-hydrogen atoms
were refined anisotropically. The hydrogen atoms were located
from the difference Fourier map and allowed to ride on their parent
atoms with Uiso(H) = 1.2 Ueq(C). The crystal structure contains dis-
ordered water and ethanol as solvate molecules. In spite of several
attempts, the electronic density in this area could not be resolved
satisfactory. Therefore the contribution of the disordered solvent
species was subtracted from the structure factor calculations by
the SQUEEZE instruction of the program PLATON [21].
To a well stirred solution of the appropriate dichloro-1,10-phe-
nanthroline metal(II) complex in an ethanol/water mixture (3:1)
was added an aqueous solution of the equimolar amount of the
potassium dithiolate, K2dto or K2dtsq. After 1 h (for the Pt-complex
one day) the colored micro crystalline products were filtered off,
washed with ethanol and dried in vacuo. The yield is practically
quantitative.
[Cu(phen)(dto)]; dark green, decomposes at 160 °C; elemental
Anal. Calc. for C14H8N2S2O2Cu: C, 46.21; H, 2.22; N, 7.70; S,
17.62; O, 8.79. Found: C, 44.21; H, 1.77; N, 7.52; S, 16.72; O,
9.00%. Susceptibility: leff = (1.8 0.5) B.M.
[Cu(phen)(dtsq)]: brown, decomposes at 230 °C; elemental
Anal. Calc. for C16H8N2S2O2Cu: C, 49.54; H, 2.08; N, 7.22; S,
16.53; O, 8.25. Found: C, 46.29; H, 1.88; N, 7.17; S, 14.73; O,
8.15%. Susceptibility: leff = (2.0 0.5) B.M.
3. Results and discussion
[Ni(phen)(dto)]; brown, decomposes at 242 °C; elemental Anal.
Calc. for C14H8N2S2O2Ni: C, 46.83; H, 2.25; N, 7.80; S, 17.86; O, 8.91.
Found: C, 45.19; H, 2.14; N, 7.53; S, 17.73; O, 8.75% (9.25). Suscep-
The series of complexes was synthesized by a straight forward
synthesis (see Scheme 1) via the dichloro-1,10-phenanthroline me-
tal(II) species followed by an exchange of the chloro ligands by the
dithiolates 1,2-dithiooxalate (dto: K2C2O2S2) and 1,2-dithiosqua-
rate (dtsq: K2C4O2S2). The problem of the synthesis is the poor sol-
ubility of the final complexes, reducing the chance of purification
by recrystallization. Also all attempts to grow single crystals of dif-
fractometer quality for the M(II) complexes failed.
tibility: leff = (1.3 0.5) B.M.
[Ni(phen)(dtsq)]:dark green, decomposes at 245 °C; elemental
Anal. Calc. for C16H8N2S2O2Ni: C, 50.17; H, 2.11; N, 7.31; S, 16.74;
O, 8.35. Found: C, 51.36; H, 2.17; N, 7.77; S, 14.29; O, 8.05%. Sus-
ceptibility: (2.7 0.5) B.M.
[Zn(phen)(dto)]; yellow, decomposes at 202 °C; elemental Anal.
Calc. for C14H8N2S2O2Zn: C, 45.98; H, 2.20; N, 7.66; S, 17.53; O,
8.75. Found: C, 45.07; H, 2.17; N, 7.59; S, 16.90; O, 8.62%.
[Zn(phen)(dtsq)]: yellow, decomposes at 309 °C; elemental
Anal. Calc. for C16H8N2S2O2Zn: C, 49.31; H, 2.07; N, 7.19; S, 16.45.
Found: C, 46.10; H, 2.04; N, 6.79; S, 16.35%.
[Pd(phen)(dto)]; light yellow, decomposes at 274 °C; elemental
Anal. Calc. for C14H8N2S2O2Pd: C, 41.34; H, 1.98; N, 6.89; S,
15.76; O, 7.87. Found: C, 39.53; H, 1.97; N, 6.49; S, 15.41; O,
8.79%.
[Pd(phen)(dtsq)]:dark orange, decomposes at 300 °C; elemental
Anal. Calc. for C16H8N2S2O2Pd: C, 44.61; H, 1.87; N, 6.50; S,
14.88; O, 7.43. Found: C, 40.58; H, 2.23; N, 6.36; S, 8.93/8.56 ; O,
7.45%.
[Pt(phen)(dto)]; light orange, decomposes > 300 °C; elemental
Anal. Calc. for C14H8N2S2O2Pt: C, 33.94; H, 1.63; N, 5.65; S, 12.94;
O, 6.46. Found: C, 33.19; H, 1.58; N, 5.62; S, 9.61 ; O, 6.12%.
[Pt(phen)(dtsq)]: orange, decomposes at 310 °C; elemental Anal.
Calc. for C16H8N2S2O2Pt: C, 37.00; H, 1.55; N, 5.39; S, 12.34; O, 6.16.
Found: C, 33.79; H, 1.78; N, 5.51; S, 6.14/5.97 ; O, 6.13%. We
have often observed that especially Pd- and Pt-dithiolate com-
plexes gave abnormal results for the determination of sulfur.
3.1. IR spectroscopy
A comparison of the IR spectra of the series of diimine/dithiolate
complexes (Tables 3 and 4) as well as the dichlorophenanthroline
intermediates (Table 2) show that all these complexes have the
same structure with only some slight differences in the absorption
energies due to the different metal centers. The IR-results give also
a clear evidence of the coordination of the two dithiolate ligands
(1,2-dithiooxalate and 1,2-dithiosquarate) via their sulfur atoms
being reflected by a shift of the carbonyl absorptions (dto:
)
*
m
(C–O) = 1514 cmꢁ1, dtsq: (C–O) = 1707 cmꢁ1) towards higher wave
m
numbers in the complexes.
)
*
3.2. EPR spectroscopy
Copper(II) with a d9 electron configuration is well suited to be
studied by EPR spectroscopy. Fig. 1 shows the EPR-spectrum of a
pure powdered sample of dichloro-1,10-phenanthrolinecopper(II)
at 150 K as a glass (frozen solution). The spectrum is of axial
)
*
)
*