Inorganic Chemistry
Article
heterocycles with hydrogen-bond donors (NH), and miscella-
neous ligands not readily sorted into another class (MC).
Perhaps unsurprisingly, glyoximes were significantly more
over 1000 min (Tables 1 and S1). Alkyl functionalization, such
as that in the archetypal dimethylglyoxime (GL1), was
important for hydrogen production, while conjugated glyoxime
derivatives and most other ligands generated, at best, only trace
amounts of hydrogen.
stoichiometric corrections. This measure of hydride affinity
was then compared to the hydrogen produced via the bis-
glyoxime complexes. An exponential curve was then fitted to
the data (R = 0.92), revealing that more negative hydride
affinity also results in greater hydrogen production (Figure 5).
2
Hydride Affinity = ΔH (Co(III)H(GL) py)
f
2
−
−
(ΔH (Co(I)(GL) py) + ΔH (H ))
f
2
f
hydrogen production by gas chromatography (Table S2) to
confirm the validity of results obtained using complexes
synthesized in situ. A comparison of these results with high-
throughput screening revealed a close correlation between the
two techniques. For instance, the WRC containing the
deprotonated glyoxime ligand GL2 displayed 86% of the
activity compared to the analogous GL1 complex in batch and
displayed 90% activity in the high-throughput screen.
Homoleptic tris-complexes of BP1 and GL1 are reported as
17,54
successful WRCs;
complexes were being made in situ rather than the desired
Co(LL) pyCl] geometry. In situ prepared WRCs incorporat-
we also investigated whether these
[
2
ing either 2 or 3 equiv of GL1, GL2, and BP1 (and no
pyridine) were run in a large number of replicates and
compared with previously synthesized [Co(BP1) ]Cl (Figure
3
2
5
4
Figure 5. Hydride binding affinity as determined through DFT
compared to catalytic production as measured through the parallel
x
reaction system. The fitted curve is of the form y = a × b and
presents a correlation coefficient of 0.925.
Knowing that glyoximes were necessary to achieve hydrogen
production, we next screened heteroleptic complexes of the
type [Co(GL)(LL)pyCl], that is, combining all 46 ligands with
each of the 16 glyoximes in an equimolar ratio (Figure 6).
Once again, significant amounts of hydrogen were produced
only when the WRC contained at least one alkyl-substituted
glyoxime ligand (GL1, GL2, GL4, and GL6). Furthermore, in
most cases where the in situ WRC contained at least 1 equiv of
the four active glyoximes, hydrogen was produced independent
of the other ligand; only selected ligands (GL11, GL12, MC3,
and MC4) completely poisoned the WRC activity. We were
mindful that our high-throughput approach was not able to
discern the catalytically active species; kinetic or thermody-
namic factors may instead lead to appreciable amounts of
[Co(GL) pyCl] or [Co(LL) pyCl] rather than the desired
Figure 4. Hydrogen production over time of select cobalt WRCs.
Each trace represents the mean of 12 replicates. Inset: standard error
represented by the shaded region surrounding each trace. All samples
except for [Co(BP1) ]Cl were prepared in situ according to high-
3
2
throughput screening protocols.
negligible hydrogen, suggesting that differences in our
experimental design rendered this WRC inactive for hydrogen
2
2
45
production. While [Co(GL1) ] also produced hydrogen (13.4
[Co(GL)(LL)pyCl]. Our initial ligand screen revealed that
glyoximes were critical for hydrogen production, and we
consequently limited our hit selection to ligand combinations
that produced >50% of the hydrogen generated using the
3
μmol), reduced volumes compared to the heteroleptic complex
confirmed that we were generating the expected WRC
(
[Co(GL1) pyCl]) under high-throughput conditions.
2
To further understand the differentiation in the function of
homoleptic glyoxime complexes, we performed DFT on several
known reaction intermediates using the B3LYP functional and
corresponding [Co(GL) pyCl] complex (Tables 1 and S1).
This ensured that we did not mistakenly assign activity
2
afforded by a smaller amount of [Co(GL) pyCl] present in
2
6
-31G(d,p) basis set. The intermediates Co(II)H O(GL) py,
solution (up to a maximum of 0.5 equiv of expected cobalt
WRC).
2
2
Co(II)(GL) py, Co(III)H(GL) py, and Co(II)H (GL) py
2
2
2
2
were explored for all tested glyoximes expected to form a
five-member coordinating ring. It is notable that in these
calculations, doubly reduced Co(I)H O(GL) py does not
Heteroleptic complexes that contained 8-hydroxyquinolines
(HQ) achieved greater hydrogen evolution than this 50%
benchmark (of the corresponding bis-glyoxime WRC) when
combined with the active glyoxime ligands (GL1, GL2, GL4,
and GL6) except for the nitro-substituted derivative (HQ3).
The sulfoxyl-containing HQ2 was particularly active, generat-
ing 16.3 μmol over the tested time when combined with GL1,
which compares well to the 15.6 μmol observed with the bis-
2
2
converge, suggesting that water is not a stable ligand, and thus
reduction opens an active species for Co(I). This is consistent
60
with the literature. The free-energy change was estimated
according to eq 1 for the binding of a hydride, using the heat of
formation determined for each complex and any needed
7
78
Inorg. Chem. 2021, 60, 774−781