Fig. 3 Initial reaction rate vs. surface area of differently rehydrated hydrotalcites in the aldol condensation of citral–acetone and citral–MEK.
space. Liquid-phase rehydration generally leads to catalysts
with higher surface areas and thinner platelets as compared to
gas-phase rehydration. The nature of the basic sites does not
depend on the rehydration conditions, as evidenced by TPD
with different probe molecules. A relatively simple and cheap
method to further overcome the limited accessibility of OH2
groups in the interlayer of liquid-phase reconstructed hydrotalcites
has been established, by using a higher stirring speed or
ultrasounds during rehydration. These protocols lead to materials
with surface areas up to 440 m2 g21, due to the high degree of
exfoliation of the HT platelets. The linear correlation between the
surface area of the rehydrated hydrotalcite and the catalytic
performance in Fig. 3 is useful to predict initial activities of
rehydrated hydrotalcites by knowing their surface area. Some of
our materials display nearly one order of magnitude higher
activities than the most active systems reported to date in the
literature.
Notes and references
{ Mg–Al (Mg/Al 5 3/1) hydrotalcite was prepared by coprecipitation at
constant pH, thermally decomposed in air at 723 K for 15 h (HTC), and
rehydrated both in gas and liquid phases. A gas-phase sample was obtained
under an argon flow saturated with water (15 h at 40 ml min21).
Rehydration in liquid phase was performed in decarbonated water (1 g in
100 ml of water) at RT using (i) mechanical stirring at different times (1 or
6 h) and stirring speed (100, 500, and 700 rpm) or (ii) sonication (5 min).
After that, the samples were filtered, washed with ethanol and dried under
Ar. The samples were characterized by N2 adsorption, SEM, and TPD
with different probe molecules (CO2, CH3CN, CH3NO2). The condensa-
tion reactions were carried out at 333 K with a ratio ketone/citral 5 4.4.
Samples were taken at regular time periods and analysed by gas
chromatography. Tetradecane was used as internal standard.
1 D. Tichit, M. N. Bennani, F. Figueras, R. Tessier and J. Kervennal, Appl.
Clay Sci., 1998, 13, 401; K. K. Rao, M. Gravelle, J. Sanchez Valente and
F. Figueras, J. Catal., 1998, 173, 115; M. L. Kantam, B. M. Choudary,
Ch. Venkat Reddy, K. K. Rao and F. Figueras, Chem. Commun., 1998,
9, 1033; M. J. Climent, A. Corma, S. Iborra and J. Primo, J. Catal., 1995,
151, 60; A. Guida, M. H. Lhouty, D. Tichit, F. Figueras and P. Geneste,
Appl. Catal. A, 1997, 164, 251; B. M. Choudary, M. L. Kantam, Ch.
Venkat Reddy, K. K. Rao and F. Figueras, J. Mol. Catal. A, 1999, 146,
279.
2 P. S. Gradeff, US Patent, 1974, 3,840,601.
3 M. J. Climent, A. Corma, S. Iborra and A. Velty, Catal. Lett., 2002, 79,
157.
4 J. C. A. A. Roelofs, A. J. van Dillen and K. P. de Jong, Catal. Today,
2000, 60, 297; J. C. A. A. Roelofs, D. J. Lensveld, A. J. van Dillen and
K. P. de Jong, J. Catal., 2001, 203, 184.
This work was financially supported by the Ministerio de
Ciencia y Tecnolog´ıa of Spain (REN2002-04464-CO2-01 and
PETRI 95-0801.OP) and Destilaciones Bordas S.A.
S. Abello´,ab F. Medina,*a D. Tichit,b J. Pe´rez-Ram´ırez,c Y. Cesteros,a
P. Salagrea and J. E. Sueirasa
aDept. de Qu´ımica i Enginyeria Qu´ımica, Universitat Rovira i Virgili,
43007, Tarragona, Spain. E-mail: francesc.medina@urv.net;
Fax: 34 977559621; Tel: 34 977559787
5 F. Figueras, J. Lopez, J. Sanchez-Valente, T. T. H. Vu, J.-M. Clacens and
J. Palomeque, J. Catal., 2002, 211, 144.
6 F. Cataldo, Ultrason. Sonochem., 2000, 7, 35.
7 M. J. Climent, A. Corma, S. Iborra, K. Epping and A. Velty, J. Catal.,
2004, 225, 316; M. J. Climent, A. Corma, S. Iborra and A. Velty, J.
Catal., 2004, 221, 474.
bLaboratoire de Mate´riaux Catalytiques et Catalyse en Chimie
Organique, UMR 5618 CNRS-ENSCM, 34296, Montpellier Cedex 5,
France
cYara Technology Centre Porsgrunn, Catalysis and Nitric Acid
Technology, P.O. Box 2560, N-3908, Porsgrunn, Norway
This journal is ß The Royal Society of Chemistry 2005
Chem. Commun., 2005, 1453–1455 | 1455