B. M. Abbott, P. E. Thompson / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 14 (2004) 2847–2851
2851
These studies reveal a new structural motif for inhibitors
of PDE2. We have shown that inhibition of PDE2 can
be improved by relatively simple substitutions and that
these compounds display some discrimination between
PDE2and PDE3. Realising the potential of these
ligands rests with optimisation of phosphodiesterase
activity at the expense of PI3K and other potential
activities. Such a goal may yet be difficult to achieve, but
the addition of a new small molecule template will
greatly assist our understanding of PDE2-inhibitor
interactions and lead the way to the development of
therapeutic opportunities across a range of diseases.
12. Gammill, R. B.; Judge, T. M.; Morris, J. WO Patent
06921, 1990.
0
3. All previously unreported compounds were characterised
1
1
1
by NMR and high resolution ESI-MS (>90% purity and
þ
correct (MH) was seen).
4. Horie, T.; Kobayashi, T.; Kawamura, Y.; Yoshida, I.;
Tominaga, H.; Yamashita, K. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1995,
6
8, 2033.
5. Assay conditions: A typical PDE2assay consisted of 70 lL
of HEPES buffer to which 0.5 lL DMSO or inhibitor, 1 lL
1 mM cGMP (final concentration 10 lM) and 20 lL PDE2
were added followed by mixing in an incubator at 37 °C
for 90 s. The enzymatic reaction was initiated by the
addition of 10 lL 300 lM cAMP (final concentration
3
0 lM) and the reaction terminated after 5 min by placing
Acknowledgements
the reaction vessel in an oven at 100 °C for 3 min. Analysis
was carried out using reverse phase HPLC on an Agilent
1100 HPLC system, in an adaptation of the method of
Ogata, S.; Suzuki, A.; Kawase, T. Jpn. J. Oral. Biol. 1995,
The financial support of the Australian Research
Council (Australia Postgraduate Award) and Monash
University (Postgraduate Publications Award) is
acknowledged.
3
7, 1. A 50 lL aliquot of the assay reaction was injected
onto an Waters Xterra RP C18 column equilibrated at 1%
acetonitrile in 0.2M (NH )H PO aq at 0.3 mL/min flow
4
2
4
rate. The elution gradient program was (a) 1% acetonitrile
isocratic for 3 min, (b) 1–10% acetonitrile linear gradient
over 5 min, (c) 10% acetonitrile isocratic for a further
2min and (d) return to the starting conditions over 1 min
and re-equilibration for 10 min. Peak detection was carried
out at 254 nm and compared to AMP and cAMP
standards. Phosphodiesterase activity was determined as
the peak area of AMP (mAU) measurement as a percent-
age of the DMSO control (where the control without any
inhibitor present indicates maximal AMP production
under the assay conditions). Unless otherwise stated, all
assays were completed at least in triplicate. Data is
presented as the mean ꢀ the SE. IC is defined as the
References and notes
1
. Manganiello, V. C.; Degerman, E. Thromb. Haemost.
999, 82, 407; Beavo, J. A.; Brunton, L. L. Nature Rev.
Mol. Cell Biol. 2002, 3, 710.
. Perry, M. J.; Higgs, G. A. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 1998, 2,
4
. Mehats, C.; Anderson, C. B.; Filopanti, M.; Jin, S.-L. C.;
Conti, M. Trends Endocrin. Metabol. 2002, 13, 2 9.
. Podzuweit, T.; Nennstiel, P.; M u€ ller, A. Cell. Signal. 1995,
1
2
3
4
5
72.
7, 733.
. Thompson, W. J.; Piazza, G. A.; Li, H.; Liu, L.; Fetter, J.;
Zhu, B.; Speri, G.; Ahnen, D.; Pamukcu, R. Cancer Res.
5
0
concentration of inhibitor where 50% of the AMP
production has been inhibited as compared to the DMSO
control.
2
000, 60, 3338.
6
. Niew o€ hner, U.; Schauss, D., Hendrix, M.; K o€ nig, G.;
B o€ ss, F.-G.; van der Staay, F.-J.; Schreiber, R.; Schlem-
mer, K.-H.; Grosser, R. WO Patent 050078, 2002;
Whitehead, C. M.; Earle, K. A.; Alila, H. W.; Thompson,
W. J. WO Patent 017999, 2003.
. Vlahos, C. J.; Matter, W. F.; Hui, K. Y.; Brown, R. F.
J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 5241.
. Benjamin, C. W.; Lin, A. H.; Morris, J.; Wishka, D. G.;
Gorman, R. R. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1993, 265, 457.
. Dickinson, N.; Jang, E. K.; Haslam, R. J. Biochem.
J. 1997, 323, 371.
16. Sudo, T.; Tachibana, K.; Toga, K.; Tochozawa, S.; Inoue,
Y.; Kimura, Y.; Hiroyoshi, H. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2000,
59, 347.
17. Izzard, R. A.; Jackson, S. P.; Smith, G. C. M. Cancer Res.
1999, 59, 2581.
18. Davies, S. P.; Reddy, H.; Caivano, M.; Cohen, P.
Biochem. J. 2000, 351, 91.
19. Pasapera Limon, A. M.; Herrera-Munoz, J.; Gutierrez-
Sagal, R.; Ulloa-Aguirre, A. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2003,
200, 199.
7
8
9
1
1
0. Abbott, B.; Thompson, P. Aust. J. Chem. 2003, 56, 1099–
106.
20. Kuppusamy, U. R.; Das, N. P. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1992,
44, 1307.
21. Matter, W. F.; Brown, R. F.; Vlahos, C. J. Biochem.
Biophys. Res. Commun. 1992, 186, 624.
22. Foukas, L. C.; Daniele, N.; Ktori, C.; Anderson, K. E.;
Jensen, J.; Shepherd, P. R. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 37124.
23. Bain, J.; McLauchlan, H.; Elliot, M.; Cohen, P. Biochem.
J. 2003, 371, 199.
1
1. Morris, J.; Wishka, D. G.; Lin, A. H.; Humphrey, W. R.;
Wiltse, A. L.; Gammill, R. B.; Judge, T. M.; Bisaha, S. N.;
Olds, N. L.; Jacob, C. S.; Bergh, C. L.; Cudahy, M. M.;
Williams, D. J.; Nishizawa, E. E.; Thomas, E. W.;
Gorman, R. R.; Benjamin, C. W.; Shebuski, R. J.
J. Med. Chem. 1993, 36, 2026.