2628 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 63, No. 8, 1998
Ogino et al.
The following trans-chalcones were prepared by condensa-
tion of acetophenone and a corresponding derivative of ben-
zaldehyde in the presence of NaOH in EtOH at room temper-
ature and purified by crystallization from EtOH; 4-methoxy-
trans-chalcone, mp 76-77 °C (lit.19 mp 77-78.5 °C), 4-methyl-
trans-chalcone, mp 96-98 °C (lit.20 mp 97-98 °C), 4-chloro-
trans-chalcone, mp 112-113 °C (lit.21 mp 112-114 °C), 4-bromo-
trans-chalcone, mp 125-126 °C (lit.19 mp 127-128 °C), 4-nitro-
trans-chalcone, mp 163.5-164 °C (lit.22 mp 157-159 °C).
trans-Chalcone was purchased from Tokyo Kasei Kogyo Co.,
Ltd, and crystallized from ethanol. trans-Chalcone-R-d was
prepared by condensation of benzaldehyde and acetophenone-
R-d3 (Nippon Sanso Corp.) in EtOD containing a catalytic
amount of EtONa. trans-Chalcone-â-d was obtained by the
reaction of benzaldehyde-R-d (Nippon Sanso Corp.) and ac-
etophenone in a similar manner. Similarly, 4-nitro-trans-
chalcone-R-d was prepared from 4-nitrobenzaldehyde and
acetophenone-R-d3 and 4-nitro-trans-chalcone-â-d from ac-
etophenone and 4-nitrobenzaldehyde-R-d, which was obtained
from 4-nitrobenzoyl chloride by the reduction with LiAlD(t-
BuO)3 in diglyme at -78 °C. All the deuterated compounds
were confirmed to give satisfactory 200 MHz 1H NMR spectra
(no proton signals at the position of replaced protons), respec-
tively.
Permanganate ion solutions were prepared as follows.
Powdered potassium permanganate (50 mg, 0.32 mmol) and
benzyltriethylammonium chloride (172 mg, 0.76 mmol) were
dissolved in 5 mL of dichloromethane, and the solution was
allowed to stand overnight in a refrigerator. After suitable
dilution of the supernatant solution, the accurate concentration
of permanganate ion was determined by a spectrophotometric
method immediately before use.
The reactions were performed by mixing a solution of
permanganate ion (2 mL) with a solution of chalcone (2 mL)
in a 10 mm cuvette, and the kinetics were determined by
monitoring the changes in absorbance at 526 nm (disappear-
ance of permanganate ion) on a J ASCO Ubest-35 spectropho-
tometer connected to a floppy disk drive for data storage. The
temperature was maintained at 25.0 °C with a refrigerated
and heated bath circulator. The data were transferred to an
Apple Macintosh computer, and a correction was made at each
moment by subtracting the background absorbance of the
manganese product estimated from the observed absorbance
at 420 nm. All the rate constants are the average of three or
more experiments. Activation parameters for the reactions
of trans-chalcone and 4-nitro-trans-chalcone were obtained
from the plots of ln k2/T vs 1/T using k2 values determined at
15, 20, 25, and 30 °C, respectively.
Sch em e 3
and co-workers showed that MM2 calculations based on
a symmetrical five-membered transition model reproduce
the stereoselectivities observed with several chiral di-
amine ligands.14 Furthermore, Corey and Noe proposed
a (3 + 2) model for the origin of the high enantioselectivty
of the dihydroxylation attained by an amine-OsO4
complex.15 Although the [2 + 2] mechanism for the
reaction of OsO4 can also rationalize the stereoselectivi-
ties caused by chiral ligands,16 and the rearrangement
of the metallaoxetane to a five-membered diolate was also
supported by theoretical considerations,12,17 many of
recent theoretical and experimental studies that ap-
peared during the course of this study support the (3 +
2) cycloaddition mechanism.18
In connection with the ambiphilic reactivity of per-
manganate ion, Lee and Brown3 gave an explanation by
assuming the occurrence of two different ionic transition
states in the [2 + 2] cycloaddition pathway depending
on the electronic nature of the substituent on alkenes
(Scheme 3).
In this paper, we present the semiquantitative frontier
molecular orbital analysis of the substituent effects on
permanganate oxidation of aryl-substituted alkenes. We
have assumed the concerted (3 + 2) cycloaddition model
and used newly introduced rate equations derived from
the general perturbation equation by approximations
based on the FMO theory. The results obtained by PM3
calculations well reproduced Hammett plots theoretically
for all the reactions examined and strongly support the
(3 + 2) cycloaddition mechanism.
Molecular orbital calculations were carried out by the PM3
method23 in MOPAC as implemented in the MacSpartan Plus,
Chem3D Pro, or CAChe Work System ver. 3.7 on an Apple
Macintosh computer. Calculations for the optimization of the
transition structure for the reaction between permanganate
ion and ethylenethe and graphical modeling for the orbitals
were accomplished by use of the PM3(tm) method24 in the
MacSpartan Plus.
Exp er im en ta l Section
The solvent (dichloromethane) used in the kinetic experi-
ments was purified before use by refluxing with potassium
permanganate and benzyltriethylammonium chloride followed
by distillation from the solution.
Resu lts a n d Discu ssion
Ap p r oxim a tion of Ba sic Equ a tion . On the basis
of the general perturbation method,25,26 the second-order
energy change caused by the FMO interactions between
two molecules (R and S) reacting in a cycloaddition is
(14) Wu, Y.-D.; Wang, Y.; Houk, K. N. J . Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 1362.
(15) Corey, E. J .; Noe, M. C. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 12579.
(16) Hentges, S. G.; Sharpless, K. B. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102,
4263.
(17) Bender, B. R.; Ramage, D. L.; Norton, J . R.; Wiser, D. C.; Rappe´,
A. K. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 5628.
(19) Black, W. B.; Lutz, R. E. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1955, 77, 5134.
(20) Noyce, D. S.; J orgenson, M. J . J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1962, 84, 4312.
(21) Frank, R. L.; Seven, R. P. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1949, 71, 2629.
(22) Le Fevre, C. G.; Le Fevre, R. J . W. J . Chem. Soc. 1932, 2894.
(23) Stewart, J . J . P. J . Comput. Chem. 1989, 10, 221.
(24) Yu, J .; Adei, E.; Hehre, W. J . Manuscript in preparation.
(25) Dewar, M. J . S. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1952, 74, 3341.
(26) Klopman, G. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 223; In Chemical
Reactivity and Reaction Paths; Klopman, G., Ed.; Wiley: New York,
1974; Chapter 4.
(18) (a) Dapprich, S.; Ujaque, G.; Maseras, F.; Lledo´s, A.; Musaev,
D. G.; Morokuma, K. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 11660. (b) Pidun,
U.; Boehme, C.; Frenking, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35,
2817. (c) Corey, E. J .; Noe, M. C. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 11038.
(d) Corey, E. J .; Noe, M. C.; Grogan, M. J . Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 28,
4899. (e) Haller, J .; Strassner, T.; Houk, K. N. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1997,
119, 8031. (f) DelMonte, A. J .; Haller, J .; Houk, K. N.; Sharpless, K.
B.; Singleton, D. A.; Strassner, T.; Thomas, A. A. J . Am. Chem. Soc.
1997, 119, 9907.