O.A. Zasedateleva, et al.
BioorganicChemistry99(2020)103829
the considered polymerases within an accuracy of 20%, which allowed
the facile observation, registration and comparison of the electro-
phoregrams obtained using different polymerases.
The relative quantities of the PCR-amplified full-length DNA frag-
ments containing modified dUMPs were considered proportional to the
relative fluorescence intensities of the Cy3-labelled primers. The re-
lative Cy3 fluorescence intensities of the doublet bands that resulted
from PCR amplification of the template using the forward and reverse
primers labelled with Cy3 dye were quantified using virtual rectangular
frames surrounding the bands. The fluorescence intensities of all the
pixels within the frame were summed to obtain the total fluorescence
intensity within the frame. The fluorescence intensity of the blank gel
region within the same frame was then subtracted from the obtained
value. The obtained quantities were normalized to the fluorescence
intensity of the full-length PCR amplified DNA products obtained using
the forward and reverse primers and only natural nucleotides. The re-
lative quantities of PCR-amplified DNA containing modified dUMPs
obtained in two experiments were averaged.
The PCR conditions for each of the polymerases were as follows. All
reaction mixtures (25 μl) for PCR amplification of the 68-nucleotide
template contained each primer (10−6 M), the template (4 × 10−9 M),
each deoxynucleoside triphosphate (dATP, dCTP, dGTP, dTTP or
modified dUTP, 10−4 M), and the manufacturer's recommended buffer
(70 mM Tris HCl, 16.6 mM (NH4)2SO4, 2 mM MgCl2, pH 8.6, for Taq
and Tth polymerases, and 20 mM Tris HCl, 10 mM (NH4)2SO4, 10 mM
KCl, 2 mM MgSO4, 0.1% Triton® X-100, pH 8.8, for Vent (exo-) and
Deep Vent (exo-) polymerases). In the case of PCR amplification by
Vent (exo-) polymerase, the reaction mixture additionally contained 8%
formamide.
Tubes containing the reaction mixture without polymerase were
placed into the heating block of a Peltier thermal cycler (Dyad from Bio-
Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and heated at 95 °C for 6 min. After that, the
temperature was decreased to 62 °C, which is the calculated melting
temperature of the P1-Cy3 and P2-Cy3 primers. The melting tempera-
tures of the primers were calculated using the DI-nucleic acid hy-
bridization and melting prediction web server [19]. Immediately after
heating for 6 min at 62 °C, the appropriate amounts of polymerase (3
units of Taq polymerase, 1 unit of Tth polymerase, 0.5 units of Vent
(exo-) polymerase or 0.08 units of Deep Vent (exo-) polymerase) were
added to the reaction mixtures, which were then stirred without re-
moving the tubes from the block. This excluded the possibility that the
activity of the polymerases decreased during the pre-denaturation
stage. Then, 20 reaction cycles of heating at 94 °C for 1 min and cooling
to 62 °C for 1.5 min were conducted.
3. Results
3.1. Properties of the aromatic hydrocarbon substituents
To study the effect of the hydrophilicity of the aromatic hydro-
carbon substituents, dUTPs modified at the C5 position of the pyr-
imidine ring by various aromatic hydrocarbon residues (R1–R7) were
synthesized. The tested substituents included the residues that mimic
natural tyrosine and phenylalanine amino acid residues as well as other
structures that could potentially interact with the target proteins
pyrimidine ring of dUTP via a CH]CHeCH2eNHCOeCH2 linker.
The hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity of substituents R1–R7 could be
approximately characterized based on the water solubility values (S
values) of the aromatic hydrocarbons, as their residues formed the
corresponding substituents. The S values were taken from the PubChem
(USA) database [23] and are presented in Table 1. These values range
addition, certain functional groups of some residues (R1–R7) may act as
hydrogen bond donors (in the case of R1) or acceptors (in the cases of
R1, R2, R3 and R5), which can influence the incorporation of the cor-
responding modified dUMP by each of the studied polymerases.
Thus, the selected aromatic hydrocarbon substituents presented and
characterized in Table 1 allowed the investigation of the substrate
hydrophobic aromatic hydrocarbons conjugated at the C5 position of
the pyrimidine ring of dUTPs via a linker.
The reactions were terminated with 450 μl of 2.5% (for the case of
amplification using Taq and Tth polymerases) or 4% (for the case of
amplification using Vent (exo-) and Deep Vent (exo-) polymerases) li-
thium perchlorate trihydrate in 95% ethanol to form 90% of the final
ethanol concentration followed by short-term mixing and 18 h of pre-
cipitation at −20 °C. After that the samples were centrifuged for 10 min
at 13,000 rpm using Biofuge pico centrifuge (Kendro Laboratory
Products GmbH, Hanau, Germany), the supernatants were removed and
the samples were washed with 40 μl of 95% ethanol with lithium
perchlorate trihydrate at the same corresponding concentrations at
20 °C for 5 min and 450 rpm using Thermomixer comfort (Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany). Then the samples were additionally exposed for
centrifugation for 4 min at 13,000 rpm using Biofuge pico centrifuge,
the supernatants were removed and the samples were dried at 37 °C for
10 min using Termo 24–15 thermostat (Biocom, Moscow, Russia). Each
sample was dissolved in 6 μl of water solution of 7 M Urea and 0.01%
Bromophenol blue and heated at 95 °C for 50 s before being loaded into
gel wells.
3.2. Efficiency of the PCR amplification of DNA strands by Taq, Tth, Vent
(exo-) and Deep Vent (exo-) polymerases using the C5-modified dUTPs
The PCR products were separated by electrophoresis in 18% poly-
acrylamide denaturing gels ((19:1 (w/w) acrylamide/bis-acrylamide,
7 M urea; 700 V; thermostabilized 16 × 16 cm glass sandwich with 1-
mm gel thickness; TBE buffer (89 mM Tris-borate and 2 mM ethyle-
nediaminetetraacetic acid, pH 8.3)) using PROTEAN II xi cell (Bio-Rad
Laboratories Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) and an Elf-8 power supply (DNA
Technology, Moscow, Russia). Samples of the PCR products obtained by
replacing the dTTPs with modified dUTPs were loaded in descending
order of hydrophilicity (increasing hydrophobicity) of the aromatic
hydrocarbon substituent.
Fig. 1A and B shows the electrophoretic separation of the PCR
polymerases in the presence of the 68-nucleotide-long template and the
pair of 18- and 17-nucleotide-long primers labelled with Cy3 dye (see
the Materials and Methods section).
As shown in Fig. 1A and B, the full-length PCR products form two
and reverse primers were labelled with Cy3 dye (see the Materials and
Methods section). The exception is the full-length PCR-amplified
strands in lanes 3, 12, 22 and 31, in which the PCR products of the
forward and reverse primers overlap in the gel. This coelution can be
attributed to the fact that in the presence of natural dNTPs, the “hea-
vier“ of the amplified DNA strands (the direct primer product) contains
10 dTMPs in its sequence and has a mass of 22,737 Da, and the “lighter”
(the reverse primer product) has 29 dTMPs and a mass of 21,725 Da
(lanes 2, 11, 21 and 30). Thus, the difference in the masses of these
DNA strands is 1012 Da.
After electrophoresis, images of the gels were obtained in the Cy3
abs
em
fluorescence range (λ
= 550 nm, λ
= 570 nm, as described in
max
max
the manufacturer’s instructions for Amersham CyDye mono-reactive
NHS Esters) using a gel imager for fluorescence spectroscopy with an
image field of 20 × 16 cm, as described earlier [17]. The gel imager
was equipped with an RTE/CCD-1536-K/1 CCD camera (Roper Scien-
tific, Sarasota, FL, USA), a mercury lamp, a pair of 535DF35 and
580DF27 filters (Omega Optical, Brattleboro, VT, USA) and a computer
running ImaGel Research software [17,20].
Since the primer regions of the amplified DNA strands contained
3