10.1002/anie.202106472
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
COMMUNICATION
profiles display two major components corresponding to singlet and
triplet emissions except for KZLTPA. The afterglow was dominated by
RTP instantly after removal of excitation, then overtaken by singlet
components as relative intensity of triplet emission gradually faded
away with CNPDTPA and KZLDTPA as dopants. While in the case
with CNPDDTPA, the contribution from RTP is still pronounced. With
KZLTPA as dopant, the contribution from triplet excited states can
almost be neglected, resulting in cyan afterglow with only singlet
component.
compromised performance. This could potentially be attributed to
accumulated heat dissipation from long-time laser excitation which
could result in severer quenching by non-radiative factors such as
molecular vibration and oxygen quenching. With 50 mW laser as
excitation source at room temperature, all four films show afterglow
duration of more than 20 minutes. In the case of CNPDDTPA and
KZLTPA, the afterglow can last even longer than 40 minutes
perceivable to bare eyes in the dark. The state-of-art performance of
white OLPL renders TPI mechanism an excellent candidate towards
stable white afterglow and could have great potentials and practical
values.
In summary, through modulation of a series of dopant molecule
structures, efficient RTP was achieved with TPP as host, while stable
warm white, cold white as well as standard white (0.33, 0.33)
afterglows can be realized with DBTSPO as host through TPI
mechanism at room temperature, the afterglow can last from 20
minutes to around 40 minutes. The photophysical characteristics of
these films depend heavily on the SOC and ISC processes of the
dopant molecules. Besides, the kinetic decay characteristics exhibit
minor relevance towards excitation power and time, with simultaneous
singlet and triplet exciton decay processes in sync throughout the entire
decay processes. In this regard, TPI based OLPL systems could
significantly reduce the threshold and complexity of white OLPL and
greatly expand the current design concepts of OLPL systems.
Upon completion of phosphorescence decay process, the emission
profiles stabilized with minor fluorescence/phosphorescence ratio
variations (Figure 2d). The CIE coordinates in this stage are (0.31,
0.35) with DBTSPO + 1 mol% CNPDTPA, (0.31, 0.46) with DBTSPO
+ 1 mol% CNPDDTPA, (0.19, 0.22) with DBTSPO + 1 mol%
KZLTPA and (0.33, 0.33) with DBTSPO + 1 mol% KZLDTPA
(Figure 2h, 2i), respectively. Through time-resolved emission scan it is
evident that the afterglow profiles consist of two stages (Figure 2c, 2d).
The initial photoluminescence decay can be attributed to host-guest
induced RTP process, similar to corresponding films with TPP as host.
The long-lasting afterglow can be attributed to TPI induced OLPL
since the afterglow consists of profiles from both singlet and triplet
excited states and no evidence of exciplex formation was found.
Surprisingly, the OLPL emission maxima with singlet components
exhibited gradual red-shift with DBTSPO + 1 mol% CNPDTPA and
DBTSPO + 1 mol% KZLTPA. The subtle red-shift can be rationalized
with slow molecular relaxation between the excited molecular and
ground state structure despite of the rigid DBTSPO matrix [20]
.
Acknowledgements
In dopants with two TPA units (CNPDDTPA and KZLDTPA), the
afterglow profiles of corresponding films are dominated by triplet
emission, while in dopants with single TPA unit (CNPDTPA and
KZLTPA), the afterglow are dominated by singlet emission. Through
theoretical calculations of the spin-orbit coupling (SOC) coefficients
(Figure 2f) it is evident that the ISC process could be potentially much
faster than the other three samples due to a much small energy gap
between the higher-lying T3 and S1 (0.07 eV). Besides, there are much
more potential intersystem crossing channels for KZLDTPA with
reasonable SOC coefficients, all of which contribute to dramatically
faster ISC processes, resulting in gradual attenuation in relative OLPL
intensity from triplet excited states, as depicted in Figure 2c and Figure
2d. With DBTSPO + 1 mol% KZLTPA, however, the energy gap
between S1 and T2 is merely 0.06 eV, which could drastically facilitate
the RISC process, resulting in OLPL with almost no triplet components.
To further investigate the photodynamic of TPI-based system,
kinetic decay behaviors of these films were conducted. It is of great
significance that the kinetic behaviors of singlet excitons and triplet
excitons remain in sync throughout the entire afterglow process to
ensure the color stability. As illustrated in Figure 3a and Figure 3b, the
kinetic decays of singlet and triplet excitons in all four films remain
almost parallel. Besides, the kinetic behaviors with 50 mW group and
100 mW group exhibit only minor differences with slightly elongated
lifetime in terms of triplet exciton decay with 100 mW group. In the
case of DBTSPO + 1 mol% CNPDDTPA, the kinetic decay curves of
singlet and triplet excitons almost superimpose in both 50 mW and 100
mW group. This clearly demonstrates excellent color consistency of
TPI based OLPL systems. Besides, all kinetic decay curves are
composed of two stages corresponding to RTP decay and OLPL decay.
The RTP decay process follows exponential decay pattern while the
OLPL decay exhibits power-law decay following Debye-Edwards law.
The second decay stage are almost identical with in the tail of kinetic
decay with 1 and 3 minutes of excitation duration (Figure 3c), while
the kinetic decay with 5 minutes excitation duration shows slightly
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of
China (51773088, 21975119).
Keywords: Organic room temperature phosphorescence • Organic
long persistent luminescence
ionization
• White afterglow • Two-photon
[1]
[2]
[3]
Kenry, C. Chen, B. Liu, Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 2111.
R. Kabe, C. Adachi, Nature 2017, 550, 384-387.
a) G. C. Smith, Phys. Rev. 1968, 166, 839-847; b) Y. Gong, G. Chen, Q. Peng,
W. Z. Yuan, Y. Xie, S. Li, Y. Zhang, B. Z. Tang, Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 6195-
6201; c) S. Xu, R. Chen, C. Zheng, W. Huang, Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 9920-
9940.
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
Y. Wang, H. Gao, J. Yang, M. Fang, D. Ding, B. Z. Tang, Z. Li, Adv. Mater.
2021, 33, 2007811.
J. Tan, Q. Li, S. Meng, Y. Li, J. Yang, Y. Ye, Z. Tang, S. Qu, X. Ren, Adv.
Mater. 2021, 33, 2006781.
K. Huang, X. Dou, Y. Zhang, X. Gao, J. Lin, J. Qu, Y. Li, P. Huang, G. Han,
Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 2009920. DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202009920.
a) L. Tang, J. Zan, H. Peng, X. Yan, Y. Tao, D. Tian, Q. Yang, H. Li, Q. Chen,
W. Huang, R. Chen, Chem. Commun. 2020, 56, 13559-13562; b) X. Wang, H.
F. Shi, H. L. Ma, W. P. Ye, L. L. Song, J. Zan, X. K. Yao, X. Y. Ou, G. H.
Yang, Z. Zhao, M. Singh, C. Y. Lin, H. Wang, W. Y. Jia, Q. Wang, J. H. Zhi,
C. M. Dong, X. Y. Jiang, Y. G. Tang, X. J. Xie, Y. Yang, J. P. Wang, Q. S.
Chen, Y. Wang, H. H. Yang, G. Q. Zhang, Z. F. An, X. G. Liu, W. Huang, Nat.
Photonics 2021, 15. 187-192.
[8]
[9]
Y. Zhou, W. Qin, C. Du, H. Gao, F. Zhu, G. Liang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2019, 58, 12102-12106.
a) R. Kabe, N. Notsuka, K. Yoshida, C. Adachi, Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 655-
660; b) S. Tan, K. Jinnai, R. Kabe, C. Adachi, Adv. Mater. 2021, 2008844.
DOI: 10.1002/adma.202008844.
[10] J. Wang, X. Gu, H. Ma, Q. Peng, X. Huang, X. Zheng, S. H. P. Sung, G. Shan,
J. W. Y. Lam, Z. Shuai, B. Z. Tang, Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2963.
[11] Z. Lin, R. Kabe, K. Wang, C. Adachi, Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 191.
4
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.