T. Yoda et al.
Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry 41 (2021) 116203
apoptosis, and cellular homeostasis.19–23 Based on the above, we hy-
pothesized that Epo-C12 might target the cysteine residue(s) of Prx 1
and induce apoptosis in BALL-1 cells by inhibiting Prx 1 activity. Herein,
in order to test the hypothesis, we investigated the apoptotic activity of
Epo-C12, by focusing on Prx 1.
recombinant citrate synthase (CS) (Fig. 6).16,30,31 Oxidized Prx 1, pre-
pared by treating Prx 1 with H2O2, was used in this assay. CS aggrega-
tion causes an increase in absorbance at 450 nm (blue line). An increase
in absorbance was not observed when a mixture of CS and oxidized Prx 1
was heated (pink line). These results indicate that CS aggregation was
inhibited by oxidized Prx 1 due to its chaperone activity. The chaperone
activity of oxidized Prx 1 was retained in the presence of Epo-C12 (light
green line) or conoidin A (orange line).
2. Results and discussion
2.1. Epo-C12 effect on intracellular ROS generation in BALL-1 cells
2.4. Binding of Bio-Epo-C12 to Prx 1 and its mutants
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) play an important role in apoptosis
induction. To investigate whether ROS are involved in Epo-C12-induced
apoptosis, the intracellular ROS levels in BALL-1 cells were measured by
flow cytometry using the ROS-detecting fluorescent dye 2′,7′-dichlor-
odihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA)24 after treatment with Epo-
To determine the cysteine(s) targeted by Epo-C12, we performed
binding experiments of Bio-Epo-C12 with Prx 1 and its mutants (Fig. 7).
Wild-type (WT) Prx 1, and three alanine-scanning Prx 1 mutants (C52A,
C173A, and C52A/C173A) were transiently expressed with a N-terminal
FLAG3-tag in HEK 293 T cells. Expression of the mutant proteins was
confirmed by Western blot with anti-FLAG tag (Fig. S1A in Supple-
mentary Material). They were then tested for the ability to bind Bio-Epo-
C12. Lysates were treated with Bio-Epo-C12 and further incubated with
streptavidin resin beads. Proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE. Endog-
enous Prx 1 and Flag-tagged WT Prx 1, C52A, C153A, and C53A/C173A
mutants that were pulled using Bio-Epo-C12 were detected by Western
blot with anti-FLAG tag and anti-Prx 1 antibodies (Fig. 7A). Next, WT
Prx 1, and five Prx 1 mutants (C71A, C83A, C52A/C71A/C173A, C52A/
C83A/C173A, and C52A/C71A/C83A/C173A) were expressed and used
in Bio-Epo-C12 binding experiments (Fig. 7B). Expression of the mutant
proteins was confirmed by Western blot with anti-FLAG tag (Fig. S1B in
Supplementary Material). Binding between Bio-Epo-C12 and C71A,
C83A, and C52A/C71A/173A mutants was confirmed by Western blot.
However, binding of Bio-Epo-C12 with C52A/C83A/C173A and C52A/
C71A/C83A/C173A mutants was not validated. Results obtained
through binding experiments suggest that Cys83 in Prx 1 is important in
Bio-Epo-C12 binding. However, C83A mutant also binds Bio-Epo-C12.
Thus, Cys83 and one or more cysteine residues in Prx 1 are involved in
Bio-Epo-C12 and Prx 1 binding. Prx 1 peroxidase activity inhibition by
Epo-C12 suggests that Bio-Epo-C12 binds to Cys52, the peroxidatic
cysteine of Prx 1. Previously, Chock and coworkers reported that glu-
tathionylation of Cys83 alone is sufficient to induce Prx 1 decamer
dissociation inhibiting its chaperone activity.16 They also reported that
glutathionylation of WT Prx 1 and its C52S/C173S mutant, greatly re-
duces their molecular chaperone activity in protecting CS from ther-
mally induced aggregation. Yang and coworkers reported that triptolide,
a diterpenoid triepoxide isolated from Tripterygium wilfordii, binds to
Cys83 and Cys173 in Prx 1.32 They showed that triptolide selectively in-
hibits Prx 1 chaperone activity through a direct interaction with these
cysteines, thereby inducing Prx HMW oligomers dissociation. Thus, the
modification of both Cys83 and Cys173 in Prx 1 by glutathione or trip-
tolide causes a decrease in chaperone activity. Taken together, it can be
speculated that Epo-C12 does not inhibit Prx 1 chaperone activity
because it does not bind to Prx 1 Cys173. It is worth noting that triptolide
did not suppress Prx 1 peroxidase activity. The effects of Epo-C12 on Prx
1 as well as its target cysteines within Prx 1 are different from those of
triptolide.
C12 (1, 5, or 10
dependent manner. ROS levels after treatment with 10
were similar to 50 M H2O2 treated cells, which were used as a posi-
tive control. Epo-C12-induced apoptosis in BALL-1 cells was inhibited by
250 M dithiothreitol (DTT), 1.5 mM glutathione (GSH), and 250 M N-
μM) (Fig. 3). Epo-C12 induced ROS in a dose-
μM Epo-C12
μ
μ
μ
acetylcysteine (NAC) (Fig. 4). These results suggest that Epo-C12
induced apoptosis by increasing intracellular ROS levels in BALL-1
cells. DTT, GSH, and NAC should suppress Epo-C12-induced apoptosis
by reducing ROS production. Generally, glutathione is present in milli-
molar concentrations (0.5–10 mM) in the cell.25 Most of the cellular
glutathione exists in the reduced form (GSH, 95%) while less than 5% is
present as oxidized glutathione disulfide (GSSG).26 Under these intra-
cellular conditions, Epo-C12 induces apoptosis in BALL-1 cells and in-
creases intracellular ROS levels even at concentrations below 5 μM.
These results rule out the possibility that Epo-C12 directly reacts with
the reducing agents to lose apoptosis-inducing activity.
2.2. Effect of Epo-C12 on peroxidase activity of peroxiredoxin 1
We first examined inhibitory activity of Epo-C12 against the perox-
idase activity of recombinant Prx 1 (Fig. 5). Peroxidase activity was
measured by the ferrous oxidation-xylenol orange (FOX) assay27 by
using H2O2 as a substrate. Epo-C12 (50 μM) decreased the peroxidase
activity of Prx 1 to 56% compared to the vehicle control (DMSO).
Conoidin A28 (50
μM), an inhibitor of Prx peroxidase activity, decreased
the activity to 33%. Epo-C12 showed cytotoxicity with a 50% inhibitory
concentration (IC50) value of 4.41 ± 2.02
exhibited cytotoxicity against BALL-1 cells with an IC50 value of 1.05 ±
0.24 M. Although Epo-C12 and conoidin A showed cytotoxicity at
μM, whereas conoidin A
μ
lower concentrations than those for the inhibition of peroxidase activity
of Prx 1, these results suggest that Epo-C12 as well as conoidin A inac-
tivate the peroxidase activity of Prx 1 in BALL-1 cells, while inducing cell
death. This possibility is supported in a previous report by Corbett and
collaborators.29 They reported that Prx 1 plays a primary role in pro-
tecting pancreatic β-cells from H2O2 and peroxynitrite.
2.3. Epo-C12 effect on peroxiredoxin 1 chaperone activity
Next, the effect of Epo-C12 on Prx 1 chaperone activity was inves-
tigated by a light scattering assay of thermally induced aggregation of
Fig. 1. Structures of epolactaene (A), Epo-C12 (B), and Bio-Epo-C12 (C).
2