C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
for 2/clay, but not at all for the solution. However, the saturated
amount of O2 was 0.51 µmol at 99 h for 2/clay, and the TN (0.63)
of 2 is less than unity. The VO2 for 2 (Figure 2c) is much lower
than that for 1 comparing the same amount of the adsorbed complex
under the conditions employed.13 These results suggest that the
terminal water ligands are involved in the catalysis. It may take
place by intermolecular coupling of MnV ) O that could be formed
by successive oxidation of a terminal water ligand on 1. However,
no evidence for involvement of MnV ) O in the catalysis is
obtained. The adsorption of 1 onto the clay suppressed the
decomposition to form MnO4- and results in a highly concentrated
condition compared with solutions, thus facilitating the cooperative
catalysis to form O2. This could account for the adsorption-induced
catalytic activity.
Figure 2. Plots of initial rate (VO (mol s-1)) of O2 evolution and yield
2
The adsorption of 1 on Montmorillonite MK10 clay also
produced catalytic O2 evolution from water, extending the generality
(ΦMnO ) of MnO4- formation versus the amount of the adsorbed complex
-
4
-
on clay; (a) VO for 1 (closed red circle), (b) ΦMnO for 1 (open red circle),
and (c) VO for22 (closed blue square). Kaolin clay4amount was 75 mg. The
of the adsorption-induced catalytic activity of 1. The plots of vO
2
2
conditions are indicated in Figure 1.
vs the amount of adsorbed 1 on Montmorillonite also provided an
upward curvature (Figure S9). The observed catalytic activity
depends on the degree of the concentration onto clays, and the
intrinsic catalytic activity of 1 is basically the same between both
clays. These results support the cooperative interaction proposed
in the adsorption-induced catalytic activity of 1. The present paper
illustrates that the adsorption of 1 onto a heterogeneous matrix is
required for catalytic O2 evolution from water.
for 1 as a powder. These data could suggest that 1 is autoxidized
to the MnIV-MnIV state on the clay possibly by a silicate layer
without a significant change in its original coordination structure.
Preliminary X-ray absorption spectroscopic data of the 1/clay
adsorbate treated with an CeIV oxidant indicated that the MnIV-
MnIV species exists before and after the catalysis for 30 min, in
contrast to the further oxidized species suggested by the corre-
sponding data for 1 with a CeIV solution.
Acknowledgment. We thank Dr. T. Sato for help with EIMS
experiments and Dr. K. Shimizu for help with X-ray absorption
spectroscopic measurements. Research was supported by Toray
Science and Technology Grant, Nissan Science Foundation, and
Grant for Promotion of Niigata University Research Projects.
The visible absorption spectral change of the aqueous solution
containing 1 and a large excess of CeIV ion was followed to see
what reactions are happening in solution. The spectral change
-
indicated the formation of MnO4 from 1. The kinetic analysis
showed that a bimolecular reaction of 1 is involved in a rate-
determining step of the MnO4 formation (Figures S7 and S8). It
is possibly formed by disproportionation of the high oxidation state.
Supporting Information Available: Detailed experimental pro-
cedures for catalysis, spectroscopic data (UV-vis, XANES, and
EXAFS) of 1/clay adsorbate, kinetic analysis for MnO4 formation,
and VO2 data for 1 or 2/Montmorillonite (PDF). This material is available
-
-
-
-
The yield (ΦMnO ) of MnO4 formed during a 30 min reaction
4
was 30-86% (0.05-2 mM 1, 50 mM CeIV, 2.0 mL) in the solution.
For the 1/clay adsorbate, MnO4 formation was also observed in
-
References
the liquid phase after the removal of the 1/clay adsorbate by
(1) Yachandra, V. K.; Sauer, K.; Klein, M. P. Chem. ReV. 1996, 96, 2927-
-
centrifugation. However, ΦMnO (18-32%; 0.15-0.81 µmol 1/75
4
2950.
mg clay, 2.0 mL) is much less than in the homogeneous solution,11
(2) Carrell, T. G.; Tyryshkin, A. M.; Dismukes, G. C. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem.
2002, 7, 2-22.
(3) Zouni, A.; Witt, H. T.; Kern, J.; Fromme, P.; Krauss, N.; Saenger, W.;
Orth, P. Nature 2001, 409, 739-743.
(4) Nugent, J. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Bioenerg. 2001, 1503.
(5) Yagi, M.; Kaneko, M. Chem. ReV. 2001, 101, 21-35.
(6) Ruettinger, W.; Dismukes, G. C. Chem. ReV. 1997, 97, 1-24.
(7) Limburg, J.; Vrettos, J. S.; Liable-Sands, L. M.; Rheingold, A. L.; Crabtree,
R. H.; Brudvig, G. W. Science 1999, 283, 1524-1527.
(8) Limburg, J.; Vrettos, J. S.; Chen, H. Y.; de Paula, J. C.; Crabtree, R. H.;
Brudvig, G. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 423-430.
(9) Yagi, M.; Nagoshi, K.; Kaneko, M. J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 5143-
5146.
showing that adsorption of 1 onto the clay significantly suppresses
-
their disproportionation to form MnO4
.
The plots of the initial O2 evolution rates (VO (mol s-1)) vs the
2
amount of 1 adsorbed on the clay gave upward curvature in Figure
2a, showing that the specific O2 evolution rate increases as the
amount of 1 on the clay increases. The kinetic analysis of VO
2
suggests that the predominant O2 evolution is produced by a
bimolecular reaction of adsorbed 1 (see Supporting Information).
Most likely, two molecules of 1 cooperatively catalyze O2 evolution
between complexes adsorbed in close proximity to each other on
(10) A similar experiment using the aqueous solution containing 0.42 mM 1
and 50 mM CeIV at pH ) 3.0 did not yield O2 evolution at all, though 1
is intact at pH ) 3-6 in the solution.
-
the clay. In contrast, ΦMnO decreased with the amount of 1, as
4
-
(11) MnO4 formed in the clay should come out of the anionic clay to the
illustrated in Figure 2b. There could be local adsorption equilibria
-
bulk solution. We confirmed that MnO4 cannot be adsorbed on clay at
-
of 1 at the interface between the clay and liquid phase. MnO4
all.
-
(12) Without the catalytic activity of 1 adsorbed on clay, the ΦMnO could
4
prefers to be formed in the liquid-phase rather than on the clay
increase linearly with the adsorption amount of 1 by the increased
-
since the MnO4 formation is suppressed by the adsorption of 1
-
bimolecular decomposition of 1. The ΦMnO decrease suggests that the
4
-
O2 evolution is correlated to MnO4 formation. This could be explained
on the clay (vide supra). As the amount of adsorbed 1 increases,
the fraction of 1 subject to MnO4- formation decreases in compe-
by the O2 evolution by adsorbed 1 that competes with the bimolecular
-
decomposition to form MnO4
.
-
tition with facilitated bimolecular O2 evolution.12 The MnO4
(13) VO increased linearly with the amount of 2 on Kaolin (Figure 2c),
2
indicating unimolecular O2 evolution in contrast with bimolecular catalysis
of 1. The unimolecular O2 evolution might be explained by either O-O
coupling of di-µ-O bridges or attack of outer-sphere water onto a µ-O
bridge in high oxidation species, probably including µ-O- radical bridges.
A coupling of di-µ-O- radical bridges in a Mn(µ-O)2Mn unit was proposed
by Yachandara et al. as a possible mechanism of O2 production in OEC
based on EXAFS results.
formation might still occur on the clay, but it could be much slower
relative to the O2 evolution.
To evaluate the mechanism of the O2 evolution by 1, [(bpy)2-
MnIII(µ-O)2MnIV(bpy)2]3+ (2), which has a structure comparable
with 1 but no terminal water ligands, was used for similar
experiments in both solution and on Kaolin clay. O2 was evolved
JA039780C
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 126, NO. 26, 2004 8085