A R T I C L E S
Arenz et al.
were carbon-supported Pt nanoparticles with mean diameters of 1-1.5,
2-3, and 5 nm, respectively (analysis by TKK). The fourth sample,
consisting of a nanostructured Pt film supported on crystalline organic
whiskers,20 was supplied by 3M Company (St. Paul, MN U.S.A.). The
particle size of the latter sample was roughly estimated to be about
30 nm based on the charge required to form a full monolayer of
adsorbed hydrogen (the so-called Hupd charge). In the following, the
catalysts will simply be denoted as 1, 2, 5, and 30 nm catalysts.
Electrochemical Measurements. The catalyst preparation has been
described previously.21 In short, the catalyst was dispersed ultrasonically
in ultrapure water, and 20 µL of the suspension was pipetted onto a
glassy carbon substrate (0.283 cm2 geometrical surface area) leading
to a Pt loading of 14 µgPt/cm2 for the carbon-supported catalysts
(TKK 1, 2, and 5 nm) and 42 µgPt/cm2 for the 3M (30 nm) sample.
The dried (Ar atmosphere) catalyst film was attached to the substrate
by a thin Nafion film. The thus prepared surface was then transferred
to the electrochemical cell protected by a drop of ultrapure water,
immersed under potential control at 0.05 V in argon-saturated solution,
and a cyclic voltammogram was recorded.
Two different procedures were used to form and oxidize a saturated
CO adlayer on the Pt nanoparticles. In the first procedure, denoted
hereafter as “oxide-annealing” (method I), before CO is adsorbed at
0.05 V, the catalyst was cycled in Ar-saturated solution (Air Products
5N5 purity) until a well-established cyclic voltammogram was observed.
After forming a saturated CO adlayer (holding at 0.05V for 10 min in
CO-saturated solution), the electrolyte was again purged with Ar
(30 min), that is, the CO stripping curves are recorded in CO-free
solution. In the second procedure, denoted hereafter as “CO-annealing”
(method II), before adsorbing CO at 0.05 V and replacing CO by Ar,
the electrode was “annealed” in CO-saturated solution by cycling of
the electrode potential between 0.05 < E < 1.2 V for 5 min. We used
this experimental approach because we recently found that the
CO-annealing pretreatment of Pt(111) may facilitate the removal of
surface irregularities, which after the flame annealing preparation
method are inherently present on the Pt(111) surface. As a consequence,
upon CO-annealing of the (111) surface, the domain size of the
p(2 × 2)-3CO structure, which is formed on Pt(111) at low potentials,
is significantly improved.3 As we demonstrate below, the catalytic and
spectroscopic properties of high surface area catalysts pretreated by
these two methods are completely different. Note, however, that the
pretreatment is reversible, that is, the particles do not agglomerate during
CO annealing. The stripping curves were recorded with a scan rate of
1 mV/s, and the upper potential limit was set to 1.0 V to guarantee the
complete oxidation of the CO adlayer. Before the potentiodynamic
measurements for the electrooxidation of CO gas dissolved in the
electrolyte (CO bulk) were performed, the electrolyte was saturated
by CO (1 atm) for 25 min while the electrode potential was held at
0.05 V. In chronoamperometric measurements, the electrooxidation rate
of a saturated CO adlayer was measured in CO-free solution at a
constant potential in order to further investigate the phenomena observed
in stripping voltammetry. For each experiment, CO was adsorbed at
50 mV for 10 min under 1600 rpm, and then the CO current transients
were recorded in Ar-saturated (15 min) solutions. The oxidation
potential was chosen to be either in the preoxidation potential region,
where depending on the electrode potential, the CO adlayer was
completely or partially oxidized (see Supporting Information), or
at/above the ignition potential, where CO was oxidized completely.
Subsequently, CO stripping voltammetry was recorded in order to assess
whether the oxidation of CO was complete. After several cycles between
0.05 and 1.1 V, the above potential-step experiment was repeated in
the absence of adsorbed CO to record the current transients due to the
Although this approach did provide some new insight into
the structure sensitivity of CO oxidation,7,9-16 in many cases,
this tactic has also showed significant weaknesses. Probably
the most notable example that the catalytic activities observed
on single crystal surfaces cannot be used as specific one-to-
one models for real nanoparticles has been CO monolayer
oxidation (CO stripping) on Pt nanoparticles in acid electrolytes.
In particular, it has been found that, although more oxophilic,
smaller particles are less active than larger particles.10 It was
proposed that the reason for this observation is a stronger
bonding of CO to the surface of smaller particles and a
concomitant decrease in CO diffusion.7,9,10,14,15
An interesting yet largely unexplored issue in structure
sensitivity is the importance of “defect” sites, which are
inherently present on Pt single crystals3,17 as well as on Pt
nanoparticles.18 For the onset of CO oxidation on Pt(hkl) (which
is observed in the so-called “pre-ignition” potential region), we
suggested that the kinetics are, in fact, determined predominately
by the availability of defect sites on which adsorption of
oxygenated species (hereafter denoted as OH) may occur.3,17
Two other pieces of evidence point to the importance of defects
in the surface chemistry of CO on Pt(hkl). The first is that
domains of the observed surface structures of CO on Pt(111)
are controlled by surface defects, that is, on less defected
surfaces, larger domains of the p(2 × 2)-3CO structure11 are
observed. The second is that the potential-dependent vibrational
behavior of CO (Stark-tuning) can be controlled by the number
of surface defects, that is, a less defected surface exhibits an
“anomalous” Stark-tuning slope.19 The importance of defects
in electrochemical reactions on Pt nanoparticles, however, has
rarely been discussed. One exception is the work by Sattler and
Ross18 who showed that Pt crystallites are not perfect cubo-
octahedrons and that real particles have rough surfaces, which
provide a variety of different sites for catalysis.
Given the structural as well as spectral richness of the Pt-
CO system, the examination of the effect of defects on Pt
nanoparticles on the CO surface chemistry is of interest. Such
a study of Pt nanoparticles in the size range of 1-30 nm is
reported here. We demonstrate how the particle size-dependent
number of defects in cubooctahedral particles affects the
vibrational properties of CO and the CO2 production during CO
oxidation. We also consider how the electrocatalytic activity
for CO oxidation changes with the experimental condition, such
as an excess of OHad or CO on the catalyst surface.
2. Experimental Section
Catalyst Samples. Four different Pt high surface area catalysts were
used in this study. Three samples, supplied by TKK (Tokyo, Japan),
(11) Lucas, C. A.; Markovic, N. M.; Ross, P. N. Surf. Sci. 1999, 425, L381-
L386.
(12) Markovic, N. M. The hydrogen electrode reaction and the electrooxidation
of CO and H2/CO mixtures on well-characterized Pt and Pt-bimetallic
surfaces. In Handbook of Fuel Cell Technology; Vielstich, W., Lamm, A.,
Gasteiger, H., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: New York, 2002.
(13) Markovic, N. M.; Grgur, B. N.; Lucas, C. A.; Ross, P. N. Surf. Sci. 1997,
384, L805-L814.
(14) Friedrich, K. A.; Henglein, F.; Stimming, U.; Unkauf, W. Electrochim.
Acta 2000, 45, 3283-3293.
(15) Friedrich, K. A.; Henglein, F.; Stimming, U.; Unkauf, W. Electrochim.
Acta 2001, 47, 689-694.
(16) Cherstiouk, O. V.; Simonov, P. A.; Zaikovskii, V. I.; Savinova, E. R. J.
Electroanal. Chem. 2003, 554, 241-251.
(20) Debe, M. K. Novel catalysts, catalysts support and catalysts coated
membrane methods. In Handbook of Fuel Cells: Fundamentals, Technology
and Applications; Vielstich, W., Lamm, A., Gasteiger, H., Eds.; John Wiley
& Sons: New York, 2002; pp 576-589.
(21) Schmidt, T. J.; Gasteiger, H. A.; Stab, G. D.; Urban, P. M.; Kolb, D. M.;
Behm, R. J. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1998, 145, 2354-2358.
(17) Markovic, N. M.; Schmidt, T. J.; Grgur, B. N.; Gasteiger, H. A.; Behm, R.
J.; Ross, P. N. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 8568-8577.
(18) Sattler, M. L.; Ross, P. N. Ultramicroscopy 1986, 20, 21-28.
(19) Stamenkovic, V.; Chou, K. C.; Somorjai, G. A.; Ross, P. N., Jr.; Markovic,
N. M. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 678-680.
9
6820 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 127, NO. 18, 2005