K. Korpis et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. 22 (2014) 221–233
231
5
.3.5. Methyl (S)-2-[1-(biphenyl-4-ylmethyl)-4-
NCH), 2.56–2.60 (m, 1H, NCH
NCH), 2.92–3.02 (m, 1H, NCH , NCH), 3.46 (d, J = 13.2 Hz, 1H, NCH2-
Ar), 3.74–3.84 (m, 1H, CHCH CH OH), 3.84–3.96 (m, 1H, CHCH CH2-
OH), 4.16–(d, J = 12.8 Hz, 1H, NCH Ar), 7.32–7.45 (m, 5H, Ar-H),
7.53–7.59 (m, 4H, Ar-H). The signal for the proton of the OH group
2 2
, NCH), 2.83–2.90 (m, 1H, NCH ,
(
cyclohexylmethyl)-3,6-dioxopiperazin-2-yl]acetate ((S)-8)
Compound (S)-7 (195.7 mg, 0.48 mmol) was dissolved in dry
2
2
2
2
acetonitrile (molecular sieves 3 Å, 10 ml). Triethylamine (0.1 ml,
.58 mmol) and cyclohexylmethylamine (0.1 ml, 0.63 mmol) were
2
0
1
3
added slowly and the reaction mixture was stirred at room tem-
perature for 16 h. For workup, the solvent was evaporated in vacuo
and the residue was dissolved in ethyl acetate (10 ml). The organic
layer was washed with 0.5 M HCl (2 ꢀ 4 ml), 0.5 M NaOH
is not seen. C NMR (CDCl
32.0/34.9 (7C, NCH 11, CHCH
(1C, NCH or NCH), 56.8 (1C, NCH
NCH or NCH), 61.2 (1C, CHCH CH
127.1 (2C, Ar-C), 127.2 (2C, Ar-C), 127.3 (1C, Ar-C), 128.9 (2C, Ar-
C), 129.6 (2C, Ar-C), 137.5 (1C, Ar-C ), 140.2 (1C, Ar-C ), 141.0 (1C,
Ar-C ). MS (EM, APCI): m/z = calcd for C26 O 393.2906 (M+H),
found 393.2877. IR (neat): [cm ] = 3338 (O–H), 2920, 2848
3
): d [ppm] = 26.2/26.3/26.9/31.2/31.9/
CH OH), 49.4 (1C, NCH ), 52.1
), 57.8 (1C, NCH Ar), 58.1 (1C,
OH), 65.0 (1C, NCH
2
C
6
H
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2 6
C H11),
(
1 ꢀ 4 ml) and brine (1 ꢀ 4 ml), dried (Na
2 4
SO ), filtered and con-
centrated in vacuo. The residue was purified by fc ( 2 cm,
h = 18 cm, = 10 ml, cyclohexane/ethyl acetate = 7/3, R = 0.11).
Colorless solid, mp 135–137 °C, yield 146.3 mg (68%).
q
q
v
f
q
37 2
H N
ꢃ1
m
C
27
H
32
N
2
O
4,
M
r
= 448.5. HPLC (method ACN): t
R
= 21.7 min, purity
(C–Haliph.), 819 (arom. disubst.), 751, 685 (arom. monosubst.).
20
9
8.5%. Specific rotation: ½ ꢂ
a
+46.3 (c 0.42; EtOAc). MS (EM, APCI):
449.2440 (M+H), found 449.2395.
D
m/z = calcd for C27
H
33
N
2
O
4
5.3.8. (R)-2-[1-(Biphenyl-4-ylmethyl)-4-
(
cyclohexylmethyl)piperazin-2-yl]ethanol ((R)-4)
5
.3.6. Methyl (R)-2-[1-(biphenyl-4-ylmethyl)-4-
As described for the synthesis of (S)-4, (R)-8 (100 mg,
(
cyclohexylmethyl)-3,6-dioxopiperazin-2-yl]acetate ((R)-8)
As described for the synthesis of (S)-8, (R)-7 (200 mg,
.50 mmol) was reacted with triethylamine (0.1 ml, 0.71 mmol)
0.22 mmol) was reacted with LiAlH
1.3 mmol) in THF abs. (10 ml). The crude product was purified by
( 2 cm, h = 16 cm, = 10 ml, cyclohexane/ethyl acetate = 3/7,
= 0.15). Colorless oil, yield 84.1 mg (96%).
= 392.6. HPLC (method ACN): t = 21.0 min, purity 99.6%. Spe-
ꢃ29.6 (c 0.37; EtOAc). MS (EM, APCI): m/
O 393.2906 (M+H), found 393.2910.
4
solution (1 M in THF, 1.3 ml,
0
f
R
M
c
v
and cyclohexylmethylamine (0.1 ml, 0.64 mmol) in dry acetonitrile
f
26 36 2 ,
C H N O
(
(
R
C
9
(
3
5
CO
(
molecular sieves 3 Å, 10 ml). The crude product was purified by fc
2.5 cm, h = 18 cm, = 10 ml, cyclohexane/ethyl acetate = 7.5/2.5,
= 0.05). Colorless solid, mp 134–137 °C, yield 164.4 mg (74%).
= 448.5. HPLC (method ACN): t = 21.8 min, purity
r
R
2
D
0
v
cific rotation: ½ ꢂ
a
f
37 2
z = calcd for C26H N
27
H
32
N
2
O
4,
M
r
R
2
D
0
1
8.0%. Specific rotation: ½
): d [ppm] = 0.93–1.01 (m, 2H, NCH
H, NCH 11), 1.58–1.74 (m, 6H, NCH
.1 Hz, 1H, CHCH CO CH ), 3.04 (dd, J = 17.2/3.7 Hz, 1H, CHCH2-
CH ), 3.18–3.31 (m, 2H, NCH 11), 3.61 (s, 3H, OCH ), 3.95
d, J = 17.2 Hz, 1H, O@CCH N), 4.15 (t, J = 4.3 Hz, 1H, CHCH
CH ), 4.28 (d, J = 15.1 Hz, 1H, NCH Ar), 4.35 (d, J = 17.2 Hz, 1H,
O@CCH N), 5.11 (d, J = 15.1 Hz, 1H, NCH Ar), 7.31 (d, J = 8.1 Hz,
H, Ar-H), 7.35 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.42–7.26 (m, 2H, Ar-H),
.54–7.57 (m, 4H, Ar-H). 13C NMR (CDCl
): d [ppm] = 25.8 (1C,
11), 25.9 (1C, NCH 11), 26.4 (1C, NCH 11), 30.6
1C, NCH 11), 30.8 (1C, NCH 11), 35.2 (1C, CHCH CO CH ),
5.5 (1C, NCH 11), 47.1 (1C, NCH Ar), 50.9 (1C, O@CCH N),
2.1 (1C, OCH ), 52.8 (1C, NCH 11), 56.3 (1C, CHCH CO CH ),
27.2 (2C, Ar-C), 127.6 (1C, Ar-C), 127.8 (2C, Ar-C), 128.6 (2C, Ar-
), 140.6 (1C, Ar-C ), 141.17
), 164.7 (1C, C@O), 165.5 (1C, C@O), 170.3 (1C, CO CH ).
449.2440 (M+H), found
aꢂ
ꢃ43.1 (c 0.42; EtOAc). H NMR
11), 1.14–1.28 (m,
11), 2.83 (dd, J = 17.2/
5.4. Biology
CDCl
3
2 6
C H
2
C
6
H
C
2 6
H
5.4.1. Receptor binding studies
2
2
3
The affinities of the enantiomeric piperazines (S)-4 and (R)-4 to-
2
3
C
2 6
H
3
wards the
as previously described.
nates as well as homogenates of the human multiple myeloma cell
line RPMI 8226 were used as receptor material in the assays. In
both assays, tritium labeled [ H]-(+)-pentazocine was employed as
radioligand. In the assays, rat liver homogenates as well as
r receptors were determined in receptor binding studies
2
6,61,62
2
2
CO2-
Briefly, guinea pig brain homoge-
3
2
2
2
r
1
3
2
7
NCH
3
r
2
2
C
6
H
2
C
6
H
2
6
C H
homogenates of the human urinary bladder tumor cell line RT-4
(
2
C
6
H
2
C
6
H
2
2
3
(DSMZ, Braunschweig, Germany) served as receptor material. The
3
3
5
1
2
C
6
H
2
2
radioligand was [ H]-ditolylguanidine (DTG), which interacts with
3
C
2 6
H
2
2
3
2
both r receptor subtypes. In order to gain r selectivity (+)-pentaz-
ocine was added to mask the
1
r receptors.
C), 128.9 (2C, Ar-C), 134.7 (1C, Ar-C
1C, Ar-C
q
q
(
q
2
3
5.4.2. Cell culture
MS (EM, APCI): m/z = calcd for C27
H
33
N
2
O
4
The human multiple myeloma cell line RPMI 8226 was obtained
from the DSMZ (Braunschweig, Germany) and grown in RPMI 1640
medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, penicillin
ꢃ1
4
49.2469. IR (neat):
m
[cm ] = 2926, 2846 (C-H aliph.), 1728
(
C@Oester), 1650 (C@Oamide), 751, 692 (arom. monosubst.).
(
10,000 U/ml) and streptomycin (10 mg/ml) at 37 °C in a humidi-
5
(
.3.7. (S)-2-[1-(Biphenyl-4-ylmethyl)-4-
cyclohexylmethyl)piperazin-2-yl]ethanol ((S)-4)
Under N (S)-8 (220.5 mg, 0.5 mmol) was dissolved in THF
12 ml) and the mixture was cooled down to 0 °C. At this tempera-
solution (1 M in THF, 2.9 ml, 2.9 mmol) was added.
The reaction mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 10 min and then heated
to reflux for 16 h. Then water was added under ice cooling until H
fied incubator with 5% CO
harvesting.
2
atmosphere. Accutase was used for cell
2
(
5.4.3. In vitro cytotoxicity assay
Cell viability was assessed by the MTT assay. Cells were seeded
out in 96-well plates at a density of 10,000 cells/well in a volume of
ture a LiAlH
4
2
100 ll culture medium. Cells were then exposed to five serial dilu-
evolution was finished. The mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 10 min
and then heated to reflux for 30 min. After cooling to room temper-
ature the mixture was filtered and the solvent was removed in va-
cuo. The crude product was purified by fc ( 3 cm, h = 16 cm,
tions of substances, added to the medium from 1000-fold concen-
trated stock solutions in DMSO. For controls, cells were exposed to
0.1% DMSO alone. After a 72 h incubation, 20
DMSO) were added to each well followed by a 6 h incubation. Next,
100 l of 0.04 N HCl in isopropanol were added to each well to dis-
ll MTT (2.5 mg/ml in
v
= 10 ml, cyclohexane/ethyl acetate = 3/7, R
yield 196.3 mg (77%). C26 = 392.6. HPLC (method ACN):
= 17.4 min, purity 97.7%. Specific rotation: ½
f
= 0.15). Colorless oil,
l
36
H N
2
O
,
M
r
solve the MTT-formazan product, and the well optical density was
measured at k = 570 nm with a 2010 microplate reader (Anthos,
Salzburg, Austria). The relative cell viability was expressed as the
percentage of the treated versus control (T/C). Linear regression
analysis of the T/C versus log concentration allowed for an estima-
tion of the IC50 value; that is the concentration that reduced cell
viability by 50%.
20
t
R
a
ꢂ
+28.3 (c 0.88;
D
1
EtOAc). H NMR (CDCl
3
): d [ppm] = 0.77–0.96 (m, 2H, NCH
.07–1.28 (m, 3H, NCH 11), 1.40–1.57 (m, 1H, NCH
.62–1.81 (m, 5H, NCH 11, CHCH CH
11, CHCH CH OH), 2.04–2.07 (m, 1H, NCH
OH), 2.12 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H, NCH 11), 2.31–2.45 (4H, NCH
2
C
6
H11),
1
1
NCH
CH
2 6
C H
2
C
6
H
11),
C
2 6
H
2
2
OH), 1.84–1.87 (m, 1H,
11, CHCH
2
2 6
C H
2
2
2
C
6
H
2
2
C
6
H
2
,