P. Kar, A. Ghosh / Inorganica Chimica Acta 395 (2013) 67–71
69
0
Fig. 3. A view of polymeric structure of complex 1. (symmetry element = ꢁx, ꢁy,
ꢁz + 1).
a slip angle is 20.30°. Similarly the phenyl rings R3 [C(32)–C(33)–
C(34)–C(35)–C(36)–C(37)] and R4 [C(44)-C(45)-C(46)–C(47)–
C(48)–C(49)] are also stabilized by
p–p interactions having a
Fig. 2. The dimeric structure of
1 with ellipsoids at 30% probability. Solvent
centroid–centroid distance of 3.696(5) Å whereas the dihedral
angle between the rings is 6.93° with a slip angle of 21.16°.
A search of the CCDC database shows six compounds similar to
complex 1. Among these, a formato bridged complex in which
unsymmetrical Schiff base, uspen (H2uspen = 2-{[2-(3-Hydroxy-
1-methyl-but-2-enylideneamino)-ethylimino]-methyl}-phenol) and
salen form 1D chain {[{Mn(salen)}{Mn(uspen)}(HCOO)](ClO4)}n
[23]. Rest of the complexes are based on symmetrical tetradentate
Schiff base ligands. Of which, compounds [Mn2(salen)2(CH3-
COO)]ClO4 [24] and [Mn2(7-Me-salen)2(CH3COO)]ClO4 [25] are re-
ported to be acetate-bridged dimers. The association of the
dimeric units via the phenoxido bridge of any of these two com-
plexes was not analyzed, although the deposited CIF associated
with the reference [24] reveals that it is a 1D polymer like the others
[15] with long Mn–O(phenoxido) distances, 2.453 and 2.686 Å,
respectively involving the vacant axial positions of Mn(III). The cor-
responding distances are 2.543(2) and 2.743(3) Å in {[Mn2(salen)2
(C6H5CH@CH–COO)](ClO4)}n [15] and, 2.576(4) and 2.729(4) Å
{[Mn2(salen)2(C6H5CH2COO)](ClO4)}n [15]. Since the Mn–O dis-
tances are within the bonding distance [26], all of these compounds
should be considered as 1D polymer. However, the relatively long
Mnꢀ ꢀ ꢀO distance [3.621(2) Å] {[Mn2(salen)2(C6H5COO)](ClO4)}2
[15] restricts the structure to tetranuclear units. In the present com-
plex, the Mn–O(phenoxido) distances [2.692(2) and 2.945(6) Å] are
rather long. However, even the longer Mnꢀ ꢀ ꢀO distance (2.945(6) Å)
is reported to be within the Mnꢀ ꢀ ꢀO bonding distance [26]. There-
fore the structure is considered as 1D polymer rather than a
tetramer.
molecules have been removed for clarity.
bond lengths and angles are summarized in Supplementary Table
2.
Within the asymmetric unit both metal atoms can be consid-
ered as five-coordinate with square pyramidal (4 + 1) environ-
ments taking into account only the five strong bonds. However,
both have weak bonds in the other axial position which make
the effective coordination number six with tetragonal geometry
and allow the formation of 1D chain. The two metal atoms Mn(1)
and Mn(2) are coordinated by the four donor atoms of the depro-
tonated tetradentate Schiff base ligand (salen) in the equatorial
sites. The bond lengths are as expected with Mn–O and Mn–N in
the ranges 1.852(6)–2.692(6) Å and 1.951(7)–1.978(7) Å respec-
tively. The two oxygen atoms O(1) and O(3) of the bridging formate
coordinate to the axial positions of Mn(1) and Mn(2) at distances of
2.142(6) and 2.114(6) Å respectively to form a syn-anti formate
bridge between the two Mn ions. These axial bonds are signifi-
cantly longer than the equatorial bonds as expected for a Jahn-Tell-
er distortion of Mn ions in the +3 oxidation state.
The r.m.s. deviations of the four basal donor atoms from their
mean plane are 0.036 and 0.033 Å around Mn(1) and Mn(2) respec-
tively. The Mn(1) and Mn(2) atoms deviate from the respective
mean plane by 0.161(1) and 0.213(1) Å, respectively in the direc-
tion of the bridging axial formate oxygen atom. The equatorial
planes formed by four basal donor atoms around Mn(1) and
Mn(2) intersect at an angle of 51.90(3)°.
In addition to these five bonds, the metal atoms show weak
interactions in the other axial position to phenoxido oxygen atoms
of salen from the neighboring dinuclear units with Mn(1)–O(30)
2.692(2) Å (ꢁx, ꢁy, ꢁz + 1) and Mn(2)–O(31) 2.945(6) Å
(ꢁx, ꢁy + 1, ꢁz + 2) thus forming centrosymmetric bridging
arrangements as shown in Fig. 3. These two alternating bridging
systems i.e. phenoxido- and syn-anti formate constitute the 1D
chain of the compound.
The crystal packing of the complex is further stabilized by offset
or slipped stacking p–p interactions observed between the phenyl
rings of phenoxido bridged dimeric units as shown in Fig. 4. The for-
mate bridged dimeric units are stacked with each other by phenyl
rings [ring R1 = C(12)–C(13)–C(14)–C(15)–C(16)–C(17) with ring
R2 = C(24)–C(25)–C(26)–C(27)–C(28)–C(29)] having centroid–
3.3. Olefin epoxidation catalyzed by complex 1 in presence of terminal
oxidant PhIO
Complex 1 is soluble in both CH3CN and CH2Cl2. Hence, its cat-
alytic activity towards alkene (e.g. (E)-stilbene and styrene) epox-
idation reaction has been investigated in CH3CN and CH2Cl2
solvents at room temperature. In both of these solvents, complex
1 produces a brown color solution after dissolution. The color is
intensified on addition of the terminal oxidant, PhIO. When sub-
strates (alkenes) are added, the color starts fading and on stirring
the solution for ca. 2 h when complete consumption of the sub-
strates is assumed, the intensity of the solution again increases
to its original value, indicating completion of alkene epoxidation
and the catalyst regeneration. The formation of epoxides was con-
firmed by the appearance of the characteristic peak in the 1H NMR
centroid distance of 3.725(6) Å. The
p–p interactions are quite
strong because the dihedral angle between the rings is 13.62° with