CHEMPLUSCHEM
FULL PAPERS
Preparation of naphthol substrates
material as the reference and 90% petroleum ether/10% ethyl ace-
tate as the mobile phase. The products were purified by column
chromatography on silica gel.
2
-Methyl-1-naphthol (1) was prepared by reducing 2-methyl-1-
naphthyl acetate (18) with LiAlH . Lithium aluminum hydride
4
(
1.89 g, 49.8 mmol) was transferred into a three-necked round-bot-
At 608C: The naphthol substrate (31.60 mmol), CH
the catalyst (0.40 g) were heated at reflux, and within 15 min 30%
aqueous H (6.8 mL, 48.5 mmol H ) was dropped directly into
the mixture while stirring. Refluxing and stirring continued for an-
other 5 min. The work-up process was carried out as described
above.
3
OH (64 mL), and
tomed flask (250 mL). The flask was placed in an ice bath and
equipped with a condenser and a dropping funnel. The air was re-
placed with nitrogen, and distilled THF (30 mL) was added to the
LiAlH4 powder by syringe through a septum on the dropping
funnel, while agitating with a magnetic stirrer. Compound 18
O
2
O
2 2
2
(
4.50 g, 22.5 mmol) was dissolved in THF (20 mL), the solution was
For all reactions with 4-methoxy-1-naphthol (5) as the substrate
only 1.00 g (5.74 mmol) starting material was used. The stoichio-
metric ratio of all ingredients was kept the same as for the other
substrates.
injected into the dropping funnel through the septum, and added
dropwise to the LiAlH slurry. The ice bath was replaced with an oil
4
bath, and the reaction mixture was refluxed at 668C. After 4 h 50%
THF/50% water was added dropwise (to protonate the intermedi-
ate) until the grey color disappeared and a greenish/yellow color
emerged. The mixture was filtered through a celite layer on a fritted
glass funnel. The filtrate was partitioned in ethyl acetate/water. The
The same procedures as described above were followed in the at-
tempts to convert 7 into 8 (both at RT and at 608C).
Test tube reactions: 1 (tip of a spatula) and a “pinch” of the catalyst
were mixed in a test tube that contained methanol (ca. 3 mL). A
few drops of 30% aqueous H O were added while swirling the
organic phase was dried with MgSO , filtered, and the solvent was
4
removed on a rotary evaporator. The product purity was checked
on a UV-active TLC plate using 5% ethyl acetate/95% petroleum
ether as the mobile phase. Commercial samples of 1 and 18 were
used as reference materials. The product was recrystallized from
CH Cl / n-hexane (10 mL/30 mL) and orange crystals formed. Yield:
2
2
tube. Appearance of a red color indicated that the catalyst was
active. The red solution was tested on a TLC plate against the ex-
pected product (2) as the reference.
2
2
8
8% (3.13 g). Characterization results are summarized further
below.
Characterization of organic compounds
2
-Ethyl-1-naphthol (9) was prepared by reducing the carbonyl
group in 2-acetyl-1-naphthol (10). KOH pellets (5.06 g, 90.2 mmol)
were transferred into a two-necked round-bottomed flask (250 mL)
containing diethylene glycol (100 mL). The flask was placed in an
oil bath and equipped with a condenser. The mixture was heated
to 1408C to dissolve the KOH. The solution was allowed to cool to
[23]
2
-Methyl-1-naphthol (1):
R =0.20 (petroleum ether/ethyl ace-
f
1
tate 9.5:0.5); m.p. 64–668C; H NMR (100 MHz, CDCl , 258C): d=
3
3
3
2
7
.31 (s, 3H, CH ), 5.00 (bs, 1H, OH), 7.13 (d, J(H,H)=8 Hz, 1H, H ),
3
4,6,7
5
.28–7.38 (m, 3H, H ), 7.67–7.69 (m, 1H, H ), 8.02 ppm (dd,
8
13
J(H,H)=8.4–1.2 Hz, 1H, H ); C NMR (400 MHz, CDCl , 258C): d=
3
9
08C and 10 (5.03 g, 27.0 mmol) was added together with
4
9
2
3
7
1
5.64 (CH ), 116.3 (C ), 120.2 (C ), 120.9 (C ), 124.3 (C ), 125.4 (C ),
125.4 (C ), 127.6 (C ), 128.9 (C ), 133.4 (C ), and 148.5 (C ); IR (KBr):
n=3334 (OH), 3051, 2951, 2930, 1599, 1573 cm
3
N H ·H O (15 mL, 303 mmol N H ), followed by heating at reflux
10
8
6
5
1
2
4
2
2
4
(
1308C). After 1 h excess hydrazine and water were distilled off
À1
.
until the temperature of the solution reached 2058C. The remain-
ing solution was heated at reflux (2058C) for 3 h and, after cooling
to 1008C, poured into an Erlenmeyer flask containing deionized
water (90 mL). The mixture was acidified to pH 2 by slow addition
of HCl (6 molL ) and allowed to cool down to room temperature.
The organic compounds were extracted with diethyl ether and the
2
-Ethyl-1-naphthol (9): R =0.54 (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate 9:1);
f
1
3
m.p. 66–688C; H NMR (100 MHz, CDCl , 258C): d=1.30 (t, J(H,H)=
3
3
7
.6 Hz, 3H, CH ), 2.76 (q, J(H,H)=7.6 Hz, 2H, CH ), 5.18 (bs, 1H,
3
2
3
3
4,6,7
À1
OH), 7.27 (d, J(H,H)=8.4 Hz, 1H, H ), 7.42–7.50 (m, 3H, H ), 7.78
3
5
3
8
(
d, J(H,H)=7.2 Hz, 1H, H ), 8.12 ppm (d, J(H,H)=8 Hz, 1H, H );
1
3
C NMR (400 MHz, CDCl , 258C): d=14.39 (CH ), 23.00 (CH ), 120.4
organic phase was washed with water, dried with MgSO , and fil-
3
2
3
2
10
4
4
9
3
7
(C ), 120.9 (C ), 122.6 (C ), 124.4 (C ), 125.3 (C ), 125.4(C ), 127.4
tered. The volume of the filtrate was reduced (rotary evaporator).
The purity of the residue was checked on a UV-active TLC plate
using 90% petroleum ether/10% ethyl acetate as the mobile
phase. The product was purified by column chromatography on
silica gel. The fractions containing 9 were combined and the
volume reduced. The residue was allowed to stand and dark
orange crystals formed. Yield: 45.3% (2.10 g). Characterization re-
sults are summarized further below.
8
6
5
1
(C ), 127.7 (C ),133.3 (C ), 147.9 ppm (C ); IR (KBr): n=3378 (OH),
À1
3
054, 2959, 2930, 2867, 1602, 1573 cm .
[11]
3
,3’-Dimethyl-1,1’-binaphthalenylidene-4,4’-dione (2):
Rf =0.27
1
(petroleum ether/ethyl acetate 8:2); m.p. 2508C; H NMR (100 MHz,
6,6’,7,7’
CDCl , 258C): d=2.38 (s, 6H, 2CH ), 7.58 (m, 4H, H
), 7.80 (d,
3
3
3
5,5’
3,3’
8,8’
J(H,H)=6.4 Hz, 2H, H ), 7.87 (s, 2H, H ), 8.27 ppm (m, 2H, H );
13
4,4’
C NMR (400 MHz, CDCl , 258C): d=17.16 (CH ), 127.7 (C ), 130.2
3
3
6,6’
10,10’
8,8’
9,9’
5,5’
(
(
C
C
), 130.8 (C
), 131.1 (C ), 132.1 (C ), 134.3 (C ), 136.5
7,7’
2,2’
3,3’
1,1’
), 138.9 (C ), 140.2 (C ), 184.2 ppm (C ); IR (KBr): n=2921,
À1
Oxidative coupling reactions
2851, 1615 (CO), 1580 cm ; UV/Vis (CH Cl): l =490 nm.
3
max
[
24]
At room temperature: the reactions were carried out by adding
the naphthol substrate (18.96 mmol) and 5%Pt–5%Bi/AC (0.12 g)
to a three-necked round-bottomed flask (100 mL), equipped with
a dropping funnel. Methanol (40 mL) was added. While stirring,
3,3’-Diethyl-1,1’-binaphthalenyl-4,4’-diol (15): Rf =0.33 (petroleum
1
ether/ethyl acetate 9:1); m.p. 166–1688C; H NMR (100 MHz, CDCl ,
258C): d=1.33 (t, J(H,H)=7.8 Hz, 6H, 2CH ), 2.84 (q, J(H,H)=
7.6 Hz, 4H, 2CH ), 5.24 (bs, 2H, 2OH), 7.25–7.28 (m, 4H, H
7.34 (d, J(H,H)=8 Hz, 2H, H ), 7.44 (t, J(H,H)=7.2 Hz, 2H, H ),
3
3
3
3
6
,6’,7,7’
),
2
3
5,5’
3
3,3’
3
0% aqueous H O (4.1 mL, 29.2 mmol H O ) was added dropwise
2
2
2
2
3
8,8’
13
directly into the solution within 20 min. Stirring was continued for
another 20 min. The reaction mixture was filtered through a celite
coated fritted glass funnel, and the filter cake was washed with
8.21 ppm (d, J(H,H)=8.4 Hz, 2H, H ); C NMR (400 MHz, CDCl ,
3
4,4’
9,9’
258C): d=14.41 (CH ), 23.02 (CH ), 121.0 (C ), 122.0 (C ), 124.3
3
2
2
,2’
3,3’
7,7’
10,10’
8,8’
(C ), 125.1 (C ), 125.4 (C ), 126.6 (C
), 129.5 (C ), 131.0
6,6’
5,5’
1,1’
CHCl . The solvent was evaporated (rotary evaporator). The residual
(C ), 132.7 (C ), 147.5 ppm (C ); IR (KBr): n=3261 (OH), 2965,
2927, 2870, 1576, 1506 cm ; UV/Vis (CH Cl): l =320 nm.
3
À1
liquid was analyzed on an UV-active TLC plate using the starting
3
max
ꢀ
2014 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
ChemPlusChem 2014, 79, 99 – 106 105