Chemistry Letters Vol.34, No.5 (2005)
729
Table 1. Cycloaddition of o-quinodimethane with dienophilesa
Nakatsuka, and T. Saegusa, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 102, 863 (1980).
b) Y. Ito, M. Nakatsuka, and T. Saegusa, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
104, 7609 (1982). c) Y. Ito, Y. Amino, M. Nakatsuka, and T.
Saegusa, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 105, 1586 (1983).
Entry
1
Dienophile
Product (yield/%)b
SiMe3
OCMe
11 Generation from ꢀ-silyl-ꢀ0-sulfonyl-o-xylenes: a) B. D.
Lenihan and H. Shechter, Tetrahedron Lett., 35, 7505 (1994).
b) B. D. Lenihan and H. Shechter, J. Org. Chem., 63, 2072
(1998).
12 SiO2-induced generation of o-quinodimethane from ꢀ-silyl-ꢀ0-
acetoxy-o-xylenes: A. R. Beard, S. J. Hazell, J. Mann, and C.
Palmer, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1993, 1235.
13 Acid-induced generation of o-quinodimethane from ꢀ-stannyl-
ꢀ0-hydroxy-o-xylenes: H. Sano, H. Ohtsuka, and T. Migita,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 110, 2014 (1988).
14 Examples: a) W. Oppolzer, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 93, 3833 (1971).
b) T. Kametani, M. Tsubuki, Y. Shiratori, Y. Kato, H. Nemoto,
M. Ihara, K. Fukumoto, F. Satoh, and H. Inoue, J. Org. Chem.,
42, 2672 (1977).
15 I. Fleming, I. T. Morgan, and A. K. Sarkar, J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1, 1998, 2749.
1
2b (81)
CN
CN
O
1a
2c
3
2c (26)
CHO
CHO
Ph
Ph
2d (63)
COMe
COMe
CO2Me
MeO2C
4
2e (77)
CO2Me
CO2Me
SiMe3
OCMe
2f (68)d
CO2Me
5c
Me
CO2Me
Me
O
1b
aReactions were conducted on a 1 mmol scale in DMF (20 mL)
16 The costs of fluoride sources are as follows: TBAF (1.0 M THF
solution), ¥37,400/mol; CsF, ¥25,519/mol; KF, ¥581/mol
(from Aldrich).
b
at 100 ꢁC for 3 h. 1/dienophile/KF was 1/1.25/1.5. Isolated
c
yield. The reactions were conducted for 1 h. dYield of the
mixture of methyl 5- and 6-methyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphtha-
lene-2-carboxylates (ca. 1:1).
17 Procedure of the reaction of 1a with methyl acrylate is as fol-
lows: Under nitrogen atmosphere, 1a (241 mg, 1.02 mmol)
and methyl acrylate (109 mg, 1.26 mol) were added to a suspen-
sion of KF (88 mg, 1.51 mmol) in dry DMF (20 mL). The mix-
ture was stirred at 100 ꢁC for 3 h. After cooling, the mixture was
diluted with water and was extracted with hexane. The organic
layer was washed with brine, was dried with MgSO4, and was
evaporated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified
with a flash column chromatography on silica gel (EtOAc/
hexane = 1/5), giving 2a (170 mg, 88%): 1H NMR (400
MHz, CDCl3, TMS) ꢁ 1.86 (dddd, J ¼ 6:6, 10.8, 13.0,
23.9 Hz, 1H), 2.17–2.25 (m, 1H), 2.70–2.79 (m, 1H), 2.79–
2.93 (m, 2H), 2.95–3.06 (m, 2H), 3.73 (s, 3H), 7.06–7.13 (m,
4H); 13C {1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) ꢁ 25.8, 28.5, 31.6,
39.9, 51.7, 125.7, 125.8, 128.8, 129.0, 134.8, 135.6, 175.8.
lit. S.-i. Inaba, R. M. Wehmeyer, M. W. Forkner, and R. D.
Rieke, J. Org. Chem., 53, 339 (1988).
1. Ac2O, pyridine, cat. DMAP
SiMe3
OH
2. KF, H2C=CHCO2Me
CO2Me
5
2a
66% yield
Scheme 4. One-pot synthesis of tetrahydronaphthalene from 3.
hand reacted with electron-deficient dienophiles to give tetrahy-
dronaphthalenes.
This work was partly supported by the Sumitomo
Foundation and a Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientist (A)
(no. 16685011) from MEXT.
References and Notes
1
18 The reaction was conducted in dry DMF (5 mL) at 80 ꢁC. The
rest of 1a was converted into 3 and 4. The water contained in
TBAF solution might cause the protodesilylation. The reaction
employing KF under the identical conditions gave 2a in 70%
yield.
M. P. Cava and D. R. Napier, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 79, 1701
(1957).
2
Reviews: a) J. L. Charlton and M. M. Alauddin, Tetrahedron,
43, 2873 (1987). b) J. L. Segura and N. Martin, Chem. Rev.,
99, 3199 (1999).
19 The remaining 1a was recovered.
3
M. P. Cava and A. A. Deana, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 81, 4266
(1959).
K. Alder and M. Fremery, Tetrahedron, 14, 190 (1961).
P. G. Sammes and S. M. Mellows, J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun., 1971, 21.
F. Jung, M. Molin, R. Van der Elzen, and T. Durst, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 96, 935 (1974).
T. Tuschka, K. Naito, and B. Rickborn, J. Org. Chem., 48, 70
(1983).
Review: H. Nemoto and K. Fukumoto, Tetrahedron, 54, 5425
(1998).
Recent examples: a) Y. Matsuya, K. Sasaki, M. Nagaoka, H.
Kakuda, N. Toyooka, N. Imanishi, H. Ochiai, and H. Nemoto,
J. Org. Chem., 69, 7989 (2004). b) K. C. Nicolaou and
D. L. F. Gray, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 126, 607 (2004).
20 S. Kobayashi and K. Nishio, J. Org. Chem., 59, 6620 (1994).
21 The pathway of the [4+4] cycloaddition might involve the
formation of a biradical intermediate: L. A. Errede, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 83, 949 (1961).
4
5
22 Many examples of reactions of o-quinodimethanes with maleic
anhydride and acetylenedicarboxylates have been reported.10,13
23 Procedure of the one-pot transformation of 5 into 2a is as fol-
lows: Under nitrogen atmosphere, pyridine (95 mg, 1.20 mmol)
and acetic anhydride (114 mg, 1.12 mmol) were added to a so-
lution of 5 (193 mg, 0.99 mmol) and 4-(dimethylamino)pyri-
dine (1.5 mg, 12 mmol) in dry DMF (2 mL). The mixture was
stirred at room temperature for 3 h. After DMF (18 mL), KF
(87 mg, 1.50 mmol), and methyl acrylate (118 mg, 1.37 mmol)
were added, the mixture was stirred at 100 ꢁC for 1 h. The re-
sulting mixture was purified according to the protocol described
in note 17, giving 2a (125 mg, 66%).
6
7
8
9
10 Generation from ꢀ-silyl-ꢀ0-ammonium-o-xylenes: a) Y. Ito, M.
Published on the web (Advance View) April 16, 2005; DOI 10.1246/cl.2005.728