Vol. 21, No. 8, 2010
Barbosa et al.
1437
The results of the extensive application of 1D and
2D NMR spectral techniques were also used to confirm
of hexane/ethyl acetate to afford five fractions. Fraction 1
(1.83 g) was rechromatographed over a silica gel column
with a gradient of hexane/ethyl acetate yielding of a mixture
5 and 6 (15.0 mg). Fraction 2 (1.0 g) and 5 (848.7 mg)
was rechromatographed over a silica gel column with a
gradient of hexane/ethyl acetate supplying of a mixture
3 and 4 (42.0 mg). Fraction 3 (3.26 g) presented as an
amorphous white solid identified as compound (3). Fraction
4 (682.4 mg) was rechromatographed over a silica gel
column with a gradient of hexane/ethyl acetate yielding
of a compound (10) (7.0 mg).
A portion of the methanol extract (10.0 g) was
chromatographed over silica gel column with a gradient
of CH2Cl2/MeOH supplying four fractions. Fraction 1
(589.0 mg) was rechromatographed over silica gel column
with a gradient of CH2Cl2/MeOH yielding of a compound
(7, 9.0 mg) and mixture of compounds (3) e (4) (53.0 mg).
Fraction 3 (360.0 mg) was rechromatographed over silica
gel column with a gradient of CH2Cl2/MeOH furnishing
two compounds (1, 319.0 mg) and (2, 10.0 mg).
Dried and powdered leaves (1.78 kg) were extracted
with methanol at room temperature, furnishing, after
solvent evaporation, 159.5 g of crude methanol extract.
A portion of the methanol extract (40.0 g) was
partitioned with CH2Cl2/H2O, supplying CH2Cl2 phase
(23.2 g). A portion of the CH2Cl2 phase (5.0 g) was
chromatographed over a silica gel column with a gradient
of hexane/ethyl acetate supplying seven fractions. The
fractions 4 (603.3 mg) and 5 (4.1 g) after successive
chromatography’s furnishing of compound (8) (138.4 mg).
The fraction seven (963.7 mg) was rechromatographed over
a silica gel column with a gradient of hexane/ethyl acetate
yielding of compound (9) (83.8 mg).
1
the structure and to establish the H and 13C resonance
assignments of 10 (Table 1).
Experimental
General procedures
Optic rotation measures were obtained on a
Perkin Elmer 343 digital polarimeter. Melting points
were obtained on a Microquímica MQRPF and are
uncorrected. FTIR spectra were recorded on a FTIR-8300
Shimadzu spectrometer using KBr disk. ESI-MS
(high resolution) mass spectra were obtained on a
MICROMASSUltrOTOF-Q (Brüker Daltonics, Billerica,
MA) mass spectrometer, using the negative ion mode of
analysis and EI-MS (low resolution) mass spectra were
obtained on Shimadzu QP5050A mass spectrometer.
Column chromatographic purifications were carried out
over silica gel (70-230 mesh). Silica gel 60F254 was used
in thin layer chromatography analysis.
1H and 13C NMR spectra were measured on a Jeol
Eclipse 400 spectrometer, operating at 400 (1H) and
100 (13C) MHz. CDCl3 was used as solvent and TMS as
internal reference. Chemical shifts are given in the d scale
(ppm) and coupling constants J in Hz. One dimensional
1
(1D) H and 13C NMR spectra were acquired under
standard conditions by using a direct detection 5 mm
1H/13C dual probe. Standard pulse sequences were used for
two dimensional spectra by using a multinuclear inverse
detection 5 mm probe with field gradient.
Plant materials
The water phase (23.2 g) was extracted with ethyl acetate
furnishing the ethyl acetate phase (5.35 g). The portion
of the ethyl acetate phase (2.0 g) was chromatographed
over silica gel column with a gradient of CH2Cl2/MeOH
supplying thirteen fractions. The fractions 3 (16.6 mg)
and 5 (12.7 mg) were submitted to a preparative TLC with
hexane/ethyl acetate supplied by compounds 7 (7.0 mg)
and 3 and 4 mixture (4.0 mg), respectively.
The stem barks and leaves of Aspidosperma illustre
(Vell.) Kuhlm. & Piraja were collected in November 2004
at Reserva Florestal de Linhares, Linhares, Espírito Santo
State, Brazil.A voucher specimen (CVRD 338) is deposited
at the Reserva Florestal Vale do Rio Doce Herbarium,
Linhares, Espírito Santo State.
Extraction and isolation
Transesterification reaction
Dried and powdered stem bark (3.08 kg) from A. illustre
(Vell.) Kuhlm. and Piraja were extracted with hexane and
methanol at room temperature, furnishing, after solvent
evaporation, 10.1 g and 46.6 g of crude hexane and
methanol extracts, respectively.
After purification, the triterpene 8 was submitted to
transesterification reaction with boron trifluorate methanol
(BF3-MeOH). In a flask were added 20 mg of triterpene
8 and 5 mL of BF3-MeOH 20%. The solution was heated
to 90 °C for 10 h. After was added 10 mL of H2O to the
reaction and the aqueous phase separated from the organic
phase by liquid-liquid extraction with hexane. The organic
The hexane extract (10.1 g) from stem bark was
chromatographed over silica gel column with a gradient