J Po lue ran sae l od fo Mn aot te rai ad l jsu Cs th em mai rs gt ri ny sB
Page 6 of 8
ARTICLE
Journal Name
orthotropic injection of DCM-S-GEM and DCM-S-GEM/PEG for 24 h.
As shown in Fig. 7, the fluorescence signal mainly appeared in liver
and kidney rather than in tumor for DCM-S-GEM treatment group
5
6
7
8
Zhang, Nano Res., 2016, 9, 663-673.
Y. Tsume, A. J. Drelich, D. E. Smith and G. L. Amidon,
Molecules, 2017, 22, 1322.
K. Sefah, D. H. Shangguan, X. L. Xiong, M. B. O'Donoghue and
W. H. Tan, Nat. Protoc., 2010, 5, 1169-1185.
J. .S Ross, C. E. Sheehan, H. A. Fisher, R. P. Jr Kaufman, P. Kaur,
K. Gray, I. Webb, G. S. Gray, R. Mosher and B. V. Kallakury,
Clin. Cancer Res., 2003, 9, 6357-6362.
DOI: 10.1039/C8TB03188F
(
Fig. 7C), compared with mainly in tumor for DCM-S-GEM/PEG
treatment group (Fig. 7D). This phenomenon claimed the limited side
effect of DCM-S-GEM/PEG compared with free DCM-S-GEM. These
experiments demonstrated that the nanomized prodrug DCM-S-
GEM/PEG is not only perfect for long-time and real-time tracing drug
in vivo, but also improving the therapeutic efficiency.
9
1
L. Fang, R. F. Battisti, H. Cheng, P. Reigan, Y. Xin, J. Shen, D.
Ross, K. K. Chan, E. W. Jr Martin, P. G. Wang and D. Sun, J.
Med. Chem., 2006, 49, 6290-6297.
0 Y. Kang, X. Tang and Z. Cai, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2016, 26, 8920-
Conclusions
8
931.
We focused on how to micellize fluorescent prodrug for solving its 11 S. Gnaim, A. Scomparin, S. Das, R. Blau, R. S. Fainaro and D.
Shabat, Angew. Chem. Int. Edit., 2018, 57, 9033-9037.
bioavailability and tumor targeting ability. We exploited diblock
1
1
2 M. H. Lee, J. Y. Kim, J. H. Han, S. Bhuniya, J. L. Sessler, C. Kang
and J. S. Kim, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 12668-12674.
3 H. Z. Chen, H. Jia, H. P. Tham, Q. Y. Qu, P. Y. Xing, J. Zhao, S. Z.
F. Phua, G. Chen and Y. L. Zhao, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces,
2017, 9, 23536-23543.
polymer DSPE-mPEG to nanomize the tumor-microenvironment
active NIR fluorescent prodrug DCM-S-GEM/PEG for avoiding fast
metabolism, displaying longer tumor retention, and achieving
precise drug release in lung tumor. It is well demonstrated that DCM-
S-GEM/PEG exhibits higher photostability, excellent specificity and 14 M. Y. Marzbali and A. Y. Khosroushahi, Cancer Chemoth.
Pharm., 2017, 79, 637-649.
sensitivity towards GSH. Compared with the free prodrug DCM-S-
GEM, the nanomized prodrug DCM-S-GEM/PEG exhibits better
biocompatibility, faster cell endocytosis rate, and 8-fold higher
fluorescence imaging in tumor cells, showing significant toxicity to
A549 tumor cells owing to the improved better aqueous dispersity,
1
1
5 M. L. Pei, X. Jia, X. B. Zhao, J. G. Li and P. Liu, Carbohyd. Polym.,
2
018, 183, 131-139.
6 Z. S. Jia, X. B. Wang, X. Wei, G. Zhao, K. W. Foster, F. Qiu, Y. Y.
,
Gao, F. Yuan, F. Yu, G. M. Thiele, T. K. Bronich, J. R. O Dell and
D. Wang, ACS Nano, 2018, 12, 7663-7681.
higher biocompatibility, and more efficient tumor cell endocytosis. In 17 Y. Jiang, X. Z. Wang, X. Liu, W. Lv, H. J. Zhang, M. W. Zhang, X.
addition, in vivo investigations demonstrate that DCM-S-GEM/PEG
leads to longer retention time than the free small prodrug DCM-S-
GEM in the tumor mice model due to the EPR effect. The longer
retention time in tumor tissue can increase the accumulation and the
subsequent cellular internalization, so as to realize better NIR
fluorescence imaging and sufficient cleavage of prodrug, generating
R. Li, H. L. Xin and Q. W. Xu, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2017,
211-217.
8 J. Y. Li, L. Qiu, X. F. Xu, C. Y. Pan, C. Y. Hong and W. J. Zhang, J.
Mater. Chem. B, 2018, 6, 1678-1687
9 P. Thapa, M. Li, R. Karki, M. Bio, P. Rajaputra, G. Nkepang, S.
Woo and Y. You, ACS Omega, 2017, 2, 6349-6360.
0 F. Y. Zhou, B. Feng, T. T. Wang, D. G. Wang, Z. R. Cui, S. L.
Wang, C. Y. Ding, Z. W. Zhang, J. Liu, H. J. Yu and Y. P. Li, Adv.
Funct. Mater., 2017, 27, 1703674.
1 G. W. Lin, P. N. Manghnani, D. Mao, C. Teh, Y. H. Li, Z. J. Zhao,
B. Liu and B. Z. Tang, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2017, 27, 1701418.
2 D. E. Barry, J. A. Kitchen, M. Albrecht, S. Faulkner, T.
Gunnlaugsson, Langmuir, 2013, 29, 11506-11515.
3 C. X. Yan, Z. Q. Guo, Y. Y. Shen, Y, Chen, H. Tian and W. H. Zhu,
Chem. Sci., 2018, 9, 4959-4969.
9
,
1
1
2
higher
treatment
efficiency.
The
nanomized
tumor-
microenvironment active NIR prodrug DCM-S-GEM/PEG provides a
novel approach to realize real-time and long-time tracking the drug
delivery and activation process without systemic toxicity in vivo.
2
2
2
2
Conflict of interest
4 K. Z. Gu, Y. S. Xu, H. Li, Z. Q. Guo, S. J. Zhu, S. Q. Zhu, P. Shi, T.
D. James, H. Tian and W. H. Zhu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2016, 138,
There are no conflicts of interest to declare.
Acknowledgements
5
334-5340.
2
2
2
2
5 X. H. Wang, Z. Q. Guo, S. Q. Zhu, Y. J. Liu, P. Shi, H. Tian and W.
H. Zhu, J. Mater. Chem. B, 2016, 4, 4683-4689.
The authors acknowledge financial support from NSFC/China
6 Y. Tang, A. D. Shao, J. Cao, H. Li, Q. Li, M. Y. Zeng, M. Liu, Y. S.
Cheng and W. H. Zhu, Sci. China Chem., 2018, 61, 184-191.
7 X. M. Wu, X. Sun, Z. Q. Guo, J. B. Tang, Y. Shen, T. D. James, H.
Tian and W. H. Zhu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 3579-3588.
8 F. Y. Wang, L. Zhou, C. C. Zhao, R. Wang, Q. Fei, S. H. Luo, Z. Q.
Guo, H. Tian and W. H. Zhu, Chem. Sci., 2015, 6, 2584-2589.
(
21788102, 21421004, 21636002 and 81602718), National key
Research and Development Program (2016YFA0200300),
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
(
222201814013), Shanghai Health and Family Planning Commission
Research Foundation (201540158), and Program of Introducing
Talents of Discipline to Universities (B16017).
29 H. Sies, Free Radical Bio. Med., 1999, 27, 916-921.
3
0 S. Maiti, N. Park, J. H. Han, H. M. Jeon, J. H. Lee, S. Bhuniya, C.
Kang and J. S. Kim, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 4567-4572.
1 D. Sobot, S. Mura, S. O. Yesylevskyy, L. Dalbin, F. Cayre, G.
Bort, J. Mougin, D. Desmaële, S. Lepetre-Mouelhi, G. Pieters,
B. Andreiuk, A. S. Klymchenko, J. L. Paul, C. Ramseyer and P.
Couvreur, Nat. Commun., 2017, 8, 15678.
Notes and References
3
1
A. J. Breugom, M. Swets, J. F. Bosset, L. Collette, A. Sainato, L.
Cionini, R. G. Jones, N. Counsell, E. Bastiaannet, C. B. M. Broek,
G. J. Liefers, H. Putter and C. J. H. Velde, Lancet Oncol., 2015,
1
6, 200-207.
3
2 N. Thatcher, F. R. Hirsch, A. V. Luft, A. Szczesnad, T. E.
Ciuleanu, M. Dediu, R. Ramlau, R. K. Galiulin, B. Bálint, G.
Losonczy, A. Kazarnowicz, K. Park, C. Schumann, M. Reck, H.
Depenbrock, S. Nanda, A. Kruljac-Letunic, R. Kurek, L. Paz-Ares
and M. A. Socinsk, Lancet Oncol., 2015, 16, 763-774.
2
3
M. Markman, Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol., 2015, 12, 628-630.
A. H. Schmidt, M. Høyer, B. F. S. Jensen and M. Agerbaek, Acta
Oncol., 2018, 57, 1084-1093.
4
R. Mahato, W. Y. Tai and K. Cheng, Adv. Drug Delivery Rev.,
2
011, 63, 659-670.
6
| J. Name., 2012, 00, 1-3
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
Please do not adjust margins