A R T I C L E S
Huang et al.
(ꢀ) of the S-T transition caused by this heavy atom effect, the
Scheme 1. Synthetic Route for Monomer 2 (dC8OPPP)
triplet energy transfer between two Ir-complex molecules can
take place via the long-range F o¨ rster mechanism. However, in
the case of Ir complexes doping into polymers (or small
molecules), the small ꢀ of the S-T transition of polymers (or
small molecules) without heavy metal pertubation, the triplet
energy transfer is mainly via the short-range Dexter mechanism
and negligible via the long-range F o¨ rster mechanism.
Scheme 2. Synthetic Route for Monomer 4 (CzPPP)
In order to confine triplet excitons on a phosphor guest, a
host material with a triplet energy level (ET) higher than that
of the phosphor guest is intuitively required as a significant
quench of triplet excitons by a low ET host for a high ET guests
can occur, as evidenced by the Stern-Volmer analysis for the
system of various Ir complexes ranging from a blue to red
emission with tris(9,9-dimethylfluorene) (F3) as the phosphor
quencher.3 High ET conjugated polymers such as poly(3,6-
c
5
carbazole) derivatives, P(3,6-Cz)’s with ET ≈ 2.6 eV, have been
prepared by limiting the conjugation length of the backbone to
biphenyl. Upon doping with a green emitting Ir complex (Ir-
2′
G, (bis(2-phenylpyridinato-N,C )iridium(acetylacetonate)), the
excellent performance with a maximum luminous efficiency (η)
of about 23 cd/A, equivalent to an external quantum efficiency
(
ηext) of about 6.6%, was obtained. The common blue-emitting
6
polymers, polyfluorenes (PFs) (ET ) 2.18 eV) and poly(p-
phenylene)s (PPPs) (ET ) 2.27 eV), are usually low in ET and
expected to be not suitable for use as hosts for high ET guests,
e.g., Ir-G. As stated above, since triplet energy transfer between
a conjugated polymer host and phosphor guest is dominated
Hence, the efficiency of the green electrophosphorescent devices
3
g,8b
9a,b
is still low for the use of low ET hosts (PFs
and PPPs ) as
5
compared to that with the high ET hosts, P(3,6-Cz)’s and
9
c-e
PVK
(the measured value ET ) 2.91 eV as shown in the
7
Supporting Information (SI), which is identical to that reported
via electron exchange (requiring a close contact within 15 Å),
some efforts8 have been attempted recently to reduce the back
triplet energy transfer from guest to host by increasing the
distance between their triplet centers. For the case with similar
a,b
in ref 10). More importantly, a design route for a low E polymer
T
as an effective host for a high ET guest still remains unclear.
Here, we demonstrate that an effective shielding of triplet
energy transfer from a high ET phosphor guest to a low ET
polymer host is possible upon introducing dense side chains to
the polymer to block direct contact from the guest such that
the possibility of Dexter energy transfer between them is reduced
to a minimum. Together with energy levels matching to allow
charge trapping on the guest, high device efficiency can be
achieved. The system investigated is dialkoxyl-substituted PPP
ET values for the polymer host and iridium guest, the device
ηext can be improved from 1.1% to 2.0%8a by grafting red-
emitting (btp)2Ir(acac) (ET ) 2.0 eV) with the spacer, -(CH2)8-,
as the side chain8 on poly(9,9′-dioctyl-fluorene) (PFO, ET )
a,c
2
.18 eV) as compared to that without the spacer. Alternatively,
introducing a bulky tert-butyl group as a side group on each
ring in the ligands of green-emitting Ir(ppy)3 (ET ) 2.4 eV)
8
b
(dC OPPP) (E ) 2.31 eV) as the host and Ir-G (E ) 2.41
has also been found to promote device ηext from 0.1 to 0.4%
8
T
T
eV) as the guest, which gives a high device η of 15 cd/A
4.12%). With further capping of the dialkoxyl-susbstituents with
when used as a dopant for poly(9,9′-spirobifluorene) (ET ) 2.18
eV) relative to the system with the same dopant but without
such modification, which reflects a reduced triplet energy
transfer back to the host. However, the chance for Ir-complex
molecules to contact with main chains for both cases still
remains high, since the Ir complexes on a side chain can still
be able to be in contact with the polymer backbone nearby and
the distance from the hydrogen atom of the tert-butyl group to
the center Ir atom is within 10 Å (within the effective distance
for Dexter energy transfer). In addition, trace host emission
under electrical excitation can still be observed in both cases.
(
a carbazole (Cz) moiety (CzPPP), the device η is further
promoted to 30 cd/A (8.25%). The further promoted efficiency
can be attributed to better chemical compatibility between the
host and guest provided by the Cz. This observation suggests a
new route for molecular design of electroluminescent polymers
as a host for a phosphorescent dopant.
Experimental Section
Synthesis of Monomers and Polymers. The polymers (mC
dC OPPP, CzPPP, PFO, and CzPF) were synthesized by a Yamamoto
polymerization method, and mC
8
OPPP,
8
(
5) (a) van Dijken, A.; Bastiaansen, J.; Kiggen, N. M. M.; Langeveld, B. M.
W.; Rothe, C.; Monkman, A.; Bach, I.; Stossel, P.; Brunner, K. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 7718-7727. (b) Chen, Y. C.; Huang, G. S.; Hsiao,
C. C.; Chen, S. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 8549-8558.
6) Hertel, D.; Setayesh, S.; Nothofer, H. G.; Scherf, U.; Mullen, K.; Bassler,
H. AdV. Mater. 2001, 13, 65-70.
11
8c
8
OPPP and PFs syntheses were
(9) (a) Zhu, W. G.; Mo, Y. Q.; Yuan, M.; Yang, W.; Cao, Y. Appl. Phys. Lett.
2002, 80, 2045-2047. (b) Zhu, W. G.; Liu, C. Z.; Su, L. J.; Yang, W.;
Yuan, M.; Cao, Y. J. Mater. Chem. 2003, 13, 50-55. (c) Suzuki, M.;
Tokito, S.; Sato, F.; Igarashi, T.; Kondo, K.; Koyama, T.; Yamaguchi, T.
Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005, 86, 103507. (d) Kim, T. H.; Yoo, D. H.; Park, J.
H.; Park, O. O.; Yu, J. W.; Kim, J. K. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005, 86, 171108.
(e) Choulis, S. A.; Mathai, M. K.; Choong, V. E.; So, F. Appl. Phys. Lett.
2006, 88, 203502.
(10) (a) Burkhart, R. D.; Chakraborty, D. K. J. Phys. Chem. 1990, 94, 4143-
4147. (b) Pina, J.; de Melo, J. S.; Burrows, H. D.; Monkman, A. P.;
Navaratnam, S. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2004, 400, 441-445.
(
(
(
7) Turro, N. J. Modern Molecular Photochemistry; University Science
Books: Sausalito, CA, 1991; pp 328-330.
8) (a) Evans, N. R.; Devi, L. S.; Mak, C. S. K.; Watkins, S. E.; Pascu, S. I.;
Kohler, A.; Friend, R. H.; Williams, C. K.; Holmes, A. B. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2006, 128, 6647-6656. (b) King, S. M.; Al-Attar, H. A.; Evans, R.
J.; Congreve, A.; Beeby, A.; Monkman, A. P. AdV. Funct. Mater. 2006,
1
6, 1043-1050. (c) Chen, X. W.; Liao, J. L.; Liang, Y. M.; Ahmed, M.
O.; Tseng, H. E.; Chen, S. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 636-637.
4
700 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 14, 2008
9