J. Chil. Chem. Soc., 60, Nº 1 (2015)
δ 2.5 (s, 3H); 7.25 (m, 6H); 7.55 (m, 4H); 7.59 (d, J =8.75 Hz, 1H); 7.98 (s,
1H); 8.02 (d, J =8.5 Hz, 1H), ppm; 13C NMR (CDCl , TMS, 100 MHz): 21.94,
127.15, 128.12, 128.22, 128.51, 129.35, 131.28,3 138.27, 138.65, 139.25,
140.22, 152.40, 153.25 ppm.
δ 3.72 (s, 4H); 7.24-7.35 ( 6H, m), δ 7.41 (4H, dd, J=7.9 and 1.8 Hz) ppm; 13
C
NMR(CDCl3, TMS, 100 MHz): 43.27, 128.24, 129.72, 131.86, 139.43, 164.81
ppm.
2,3-Di-p-tolylquinoxaline (Table 1, 3k )
6-nitro-2,3-diphenylquinoxaline (Table 1, 3c)
M.p. = 146–147 0C (147-148 °C [19]). 1H NMR (CDCl , TMS, 400 MHz):
δ 2.33(s, 6H), 7.21 (d, J= 7.9, 4H), 7.48 (d, J= 8.0, 4H), 7.636 (m, 2H), 8.19 (m,
2H) ppm; 13C NMR(CDCl , TMS, 100 MHz): 21.27, 128.24, 128.75, 129.66,
129.83, 135.63, 138.44, 1430.83, 153.71 ppm.
M.p. = 186–188 0C (185-187 °C [47]).1H NMR (CDCl , TMS, 400 MHz):
δ 7.34 (m, 6H); 7.55 (d, J =6.75 Hz, 4H); 8.32 (d, J =9.23 3HZ, 1H); 8.49 (d, J
=7 HZ, 1H); 9.05 (s, 1H), ppm; 13C NMR (CDCl3, TMS, 100 MHz): 125.45,
128.32, 129.28, 129.58, 129.74, 129.83, 130.45, 138.36, 138.57, 139.97,
143.52, 147.74 ppm.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
2,3-bis(4-methoxyphenyl)quinoxaline (Table 1, 3d)
M.p. = 146–148 0C (145-147 °C [46]). 1H NMR (CDCl , TMS,400 MHz):
δ 3.81(s, 6H); 6.86 (d, J =8.25 Hz, 4H); 7.48 (d, J =8.25 Hz,34H); 7.53 (m, 2H);
8.1 (m, 2H), ppm; 13C NMR (CDCl , TMS,100 MHz): 55.12, 111.57, 127.47,
128.53, 130.15, 131.45, 140.78, 1533.23, 159.58 ppm.
XRD, SEM and TEM analysis of catalyst
The structure of the prepared catalyst was identified by powder XRD.
X-ray patterns of the nano SbCl5.SiO2 were recorded. The XRD of nano SiO2
showed no considerable peaks of crystallinity (Figure 1a). However, the XRD
of nano SbCl .SiO2 (Figure 1b) showed small amount of crystallinity with the
characteristic5peaks. To obtain a visual image of the nano SbCl5.SiO2, scanning
electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were
carried out. by SEM and TEM images, some information about the morphology
of the catalyst nano particles was obtained as presented in (Figure 2a-d). As can
be seen from the figure, the sample shows a nano crystalline structure.
2,3-bis(4-methoxyphenyl)-6-methylquinoxaline (Table 1, 3e)
M.p. = 124–126 0C (125-127 °C [47]). 1H NMR (CDCl3, TMS, 400 MHz):
δ 2.65 (s, 3H); 3.72 (s, 6H); 6.56 (d, J =8.75 Hz, 4H); 7.42 (d, J =8.5 Hz,
4H); 7.55 (d, J =8.5 Hz, 1H); 7.85 (s, 1H), 8.1 (d, J =8.5 Hz, 1H) ppm; 13C
NMR (CDCl3, TMS, 100 MHz): 21.25, 55.47, 112.25, 127.48, 128.27, 130.78,
131.43, 131.56, 139.72, 140.08, 141.12, 152.19, 152.75, 160.12 ppm.
2,3-bis(4-methoxyphenyl)-6-nitroquinoxaline (Table 1, 3f)
M.p. = 191–193 0C (192-194 °C [47]).1H NMR (CDCl3, TMS, 400 MHz):
δ 3.81 (s, 6H); 6.72 (d, J = 8 Hz, 4H); 7.53–7.58 (m, 4H), 8.15 (d, J = 9.25 Hz,
1H), 8.35 (d, J = 9.25 Hz, 1H), 8.95(s, 1H) ppm; 13C NMR (CDCl3, TMS, 100
MHz): 55.25, 113.15, 122.74, 124.49, 130.25, 130.41, 131.74, 131.82, 144, 46,
155.74, 155.89, 160.90 ppm.
Synthesis of quinoxalines in the presence of nano SbCl5.SiO2 under
solventless conditions
To demonstrate the generality and scope of this method, we examined the
reaction of 1,2-diamine with a number of differently substituted 1,2-diketone
under solventless conditions. The results of this study are presented in table 1.
Quinoxaline derivatives were synthesized over nano SbCl5.SiO2using
various 1,2-diketones and 1,2-diamines at room temperature; the results
are presented in table 1. As shown in table 1, all reactions have proceeded
very efficiently at room temperature and no undesirable side-reactions were
observed, although the yields were highly dependent on the substrate used. The
effects of electron deficiency and of the nature of sustituents on the aromatic
ring of diamine and diketone on the yield of quinoxalines were small. For
instance, electron-donating substituents present in diamine part, increased the
yields of products, whereas the effect is reverse with the electron-withdrawing
substituents (Table 1). On the other hand, electron-donating substituents with
aromatic 1,2-diketone decreased the product yields. However, the variations in
the yields were very little. The results summarized in table 1 clearly indicate the
scope of the reaction with respect to the synthesis of quinoxaline derivatives on
nano SbCl .SiO2 supported catalyst. The proposed mechanism for synthesis of
quinoxalin5e may be visualized to occur via reactions as depicted in scheme 2.
2,3-dimethylquinoxaline (Table 1, 3g)
M.p. = 105–106 0C (105-107 °C [48]).1H NMR (CDCl3, TMS, 400 MHz):
δ 2.59 (s, 6H); 7.52–7.57 (m, 2H); 7.85–7.89 (m, 2H), ppm; 13C NMR (CDCl3,
TMS, 100 MHz): 23.08, 128.21, 128.48, 128.69, 140.95 ppm
2,3,6-trimethylquinoxaline (Table 1, 3h)
M.p. = 112–114 0C (113-115 °C [48]).1H NMR (CDCl3, TMS, 400 MHz):
δ 2.45 (s, 3H); 2.65 (s, 6H); 7.41 (d, J = 8.5, 1H); 7.68 (s, 1H); 7.81 (d, J = 8.25,
1H),ppm; 13C NMR(CDCl3, TMS, 100 MHz): 21.5, 23.58, 127.14, 127.45,
131.48, 139.17, 139.48, 141.56, 152.43 ppm.
2,3-dimethyl-6-nitroquinoxaline (Table 1, 3i)
M.p. = 130–131 0C (130-132 °C [48]).1H NMR (CDCl , TMS, 400 MHz):
δ 2.75 (s, 6H); 8.01 (d, J = 9 Hz, 1H); 8.34 (d, J = 9 Hz, 1H)3; 8.78 (s, 1H), ppm;
13C NMR(CDCl3, TMS, 100 MHz): 23.27, 122.24, 124.79, 129.86, 139.83,
143.63, 147.04, 156.27, 157.21 ppm.
2,3-dihydro-5,6-diphenylpyrazine (Table 1, 3j)
M.p. = 154–155 0C (154-156 °C [49]). 1H NMR (CDCl3, TMS, 400 MHz):
Fig. 1.The XRD pattern of (a) nano SiO2 and (b) nano SbCl5.SiO2
2852