ChemComm
Communication
Table 1 Enantioselective reduction of a-cyano and a-nitroacetophenonesa
the amount of Ir in the eighth recycle is 30.09 mg per gram of
catalyst and only 6.7% of Ir was lost.
In conclusion, by taking advantage of a direct post-coordination
method, we conveniently constructed one ethenylene-bridged, hydro-
phobic, chiral organoiridium-functionalized heterogeneous catalyst.
This catalyst displays excellent catalytic activity and high enantios-
electivity in the enantioselective reduction of a-cyanoacetophenones
and a-nitroacetophenones in aqueous medium. As presented in this
study, the excellent catalytic activity and high enantioselectivity are
attributed to the high hydrophobicity and uniformly distributed
single-site iridium active species within the PMO material, which
significantly promote organic transformation in aqueous medium. In
addition, the heterogeneous catalyst could be recovered and reused at
least eight times without loss of its catalytic activity. This strategy here
offers a facile means to construct a hydrophobic chiral organometal-
functionalized PMO with high catalytic performance.
Entry
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Ar
X
Time
12
Conv.b (%)
99
eeb (%)
96(94)c
Ph
Ph
Ph
p-FPh
m-ClPh
p-BrPh
p-MePh
m-MeOPh
2-Furyl
2-Thiophenyl
Ph
CN
CN
CN
CN
CN
CN
CN
CN
CN
CN
NO2
NO2
NO2
NO2
NO2
14
24
12
12
12
12
12
12
15
10
10
10
10
15
99
92
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
92d
95e
93
93
93
97
94
96
98
97
96
93
96
96
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
p-FPh
p-ClPh
p-MePh
p-MeOPh
We are grateful to Shanghai Sciences and Technologies
Development Fund (12nm0500500 and 13ZR1458700), CSIRT
(IRT1269) and Shanghai Municipal Education Commission
(12ZZ135, 14YZ074) for financial support.
a
Reaction conditions: catalyst 3 (20.0 mg, 2.0 mmol of Ir, based on the
ICP analysis), a-cyanoacetophenones (a-nitroacetophenones) (0.80 mmol)
and the aqueous solution of formic acid (5.0 equiv. 1.0 M formate
solution, 0.2 M overall concentration, for X = CN, pH = 3.5; for X =
b
NO2, pH = 2.0), at room temperature (25 1C) for 10–24 h. Determined by
chiral HPLC analysis (see ESI in Fig. S11 and S13). Data in the bracket
c
Notes and references
1 (a) N. Mizoshita, T. Taniab and S. Inagaki, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011,
were obtained using the homogeneous Cp*IrPFPSDPEN as a catalyst.
d
Data were obtained using the mixed SO3H–PMO (2) and its homo-
e
¨
40, 789; (b) F. Hoffmann and M. Froba, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011, 40, 608;
geneous Cp*IrPFPSDPEN as a catalyst. Data were obtained using
catalyst 3 with a substrate-to-catalyst mole ratio of 600.
¨
(c) F. Hoffmann, M. Cornelius, J. Morell and M. Froba, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 2006, 45, 3216; (d) M. Kruk, Acc. Chem. Res., 2012, 45, 1678.
2 (a) F. Kleitz, Handbook of Asymmetric Heterogeneous Catalysis, Wiley-
VCH, Weinheim, 2008, p. 178; (b) C. E. Song, in Handbook of
Asymmetric Heterogeneous Catalysis, ed. K. L. Ding and Y. Uozumi,
Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2009, p. 25; (c) H. Zou, S. S. Wu and J. Shen,
Chem. Rev., 2008, 108, 3893; (d) S. Minakata and M. Komatsu, Chem.
Rev., 2009, 109, 711; (e) A. Corma, Chem. Rev., 1997, 97, 2373.
3 (a) M. E. Davis, Nature, 2002, 417, 813; (b) S. Inagaki, S. Guan,
T. Ohsuna and O. Terasaki, Nature, 2002, 416, 304; (c) J. L. Huang,
F. X. Zhu, W. H. He, F. Zhang, W. Wang and H. X. Li, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2010, 132, 1492; (d) X. S. Yang, F. X. Zhu, J. L. Huang, F. Zhang
and H. X. Li, Chem. Mater., 2009, 21, 4925.
4 (a) A. Kuschel and S. Polarz, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 6558;
(b) X. Wu, T. Blackburn, J. D. Webb, A. E. Garcia-Bennett and
C. M. Crudden, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 8095; (c) X. Liu,
P. Y. Wang, L. Zhang, J. Yang, C. Li and Q. H. Yang, Chem. – Eur. J.,
2010, 16, 12727; (d) R. A. Garcia, R. van Grieken, J. Iglesias,
V. Morales and N. Villajos, J. Catal., 2010, 274, 221; (e) P. Y. Wang,
X. Liu, J. Yang, Y. Yang, L. Zhang, Q. H. Yang and C. Li, J. Mater.
Chem., 2009, 19, 8009; ( f ) T. Seki, K. McEleney and C. M. Crudden,
Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 6369.
5 (a) X. S. Gao, R. Liu, D. C. Zhang, M. Wu, T. Y. Cheng and G. H. Liu,
Chem. – Eur. J., 2014, 20, 1515; (b) R. Liu, R. H. Jin, L. Y. Kong,
J. Y. Wang, C. Chen, T. Y. Cheng and G. H. Liu, Chem. – Asian J.,
2013, 8, 3108; (c) R. H. Jin, K. T. Liu, D. Q. Xia, Q. Q. Qian, G. H. Liu
and H. X. Li, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2012, 354, 3265; (d) B. X. Deng,
T. Y. Cheng, M. Wu, J. Y. Wang and G. H. Liu, ChemCatChem, 2013,
5, 2856; (e) W. Xiao, R. H. Jin, T. Y. Cheng, D. Q. Xia, H. Yao, F. Gao,
B. X. Deng and G. H. Liu, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 11898;
( f ) H. S. Zhang, R. H. Jin, H. Yao, S. Tang, J. L. Zhuang, G. H. Liu
and H. X. Li, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 7874.
that is, various electron-withdrawing and electron-donating sub-
stituents of the Ar moiety led to the same efficiency (entries 4–10).
The asymmetric reaction was also suitable for the enantioselective
reduction of a-nitroacetophenones. Similarly, high conversions,
no side products, and high enantioselectivities could also be
obtained with several a-nitroacetophenones (entries 11–15).
It is worth mentioning that the asymmetric reaction catalyzed by
3 has the reaction rate higher than that attained with its homo-
geneous counterpart, Cp*IrPFPSDPEN.6a For example, we found
that the enantioselective reduction of benzoylacetonitrile catalyzed
by 3 could reach completion within 12 h, whereas the reaction
catalyzed by Cp*IrPFPSDPEN required 24 h. Notably, the greatly
enhanced reaction rate attained with 3 is due to the uniformly
distributed single-site iridium active species and the highly hydro-
phobic PMO network (see ESI† in Fig. S6–S9). To confirm this
conclusion, the kinetic profile of the enantioselective reduction of
benzoylacetonitrile catalyzed by 3 and by Cp*IrPFPSDPEN were
investigated. The results show that the initial activity of 3 was
higher than that of Cp*IrPFPSDPEN; the initial TOF values were
94.2 and 39.0 mol (molÀ1 hÀ1), respectively (see ESI† in Fig. S10).
Important considerations in the design of any heterogeneous
catalyst are ease of separation by simple filtration and retention of
catalytic activity and enantioselectivity of the recovered catalyst
after multiple cycles. We found that 3 could be recovered easily
and reused in eight consecutive reactions for enantioselective
reduction of benzoylacetonitrile. In the eighth recycle, catalyst 3
still afforded the desired products with 98.2% conversion and
95.2% ee value (see ESI† in Table S1 and Fig. S12). Apparently, the
high recyclability should be due to the low leaching of Ir, in which
´
6 (a) O. Soltani, M. A. Ariger, H. Vazquez-Villa and E. M. Carreira, Org.
´
Lett., 2010, 12, 2893; (b) H. Vazquez-Villa, S. Reber, M. A. Ariger and
E. M. Carreira, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 8979; (c) R. ter Halle,
E. Schulz and M. Lemaire, Synlett, 1997, 1257.
7 M. Sasidharan and A. Bhaumik, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2013,
5, 2618.
8 S. Hiraoka, M. Shiro and M. Shionoya, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 1214.
9 S. Ogo, N. Makihara and Y. Watanabe, Organometallics, 1999, 18, 5470.
+
+
+
10 O. Krocher, O. A. Koppel, M. Froba and A. Baiker, J. Catal., 1998,
178, 284.
This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 10891--10893 | 10893