Table 2 Indium–bipyridine-catalyzed ring opening of meso-epoxides
with thiols
a
b
c,d
ee (%)
Entry Ar
R
Yield (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
1
2
3
C
C
C
C
C
C
6
6
6
6
6
6
H
H
H
H
H
H
5
5
5
5
5
5
C
C
6
H
H
5
CH
2
80 (4a)
81 (4b)
79 (4c)
91 (4d)
90 (4e)
89 (4f)
79 (4g)
82 (4h)
67 (4i)
76 (4j)
68 (4k)
92
96
96
.95
95
96
96
96
91
85
92
92
93
6
5
4-Me-C
CH CH
n-Bu
(CH
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
6
H
4
3
2
+
Fig. 2 ORTEP (50% ellipsoid) of the [InBr ?1a?H O] moiety in the
2
2
3
)
2
CH(CH
2
)
2
2 2 2
X-ray crystal structure of [InBr ?1a?H O]Br?THF?4H O.
2-Naphthyl
2-Naphthyl
3-Me-C
4-Me-C
4-Me-C
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
CH
2
+
6
6
6
H
H
H
4
4
4
a molecular peak at 602.9533 for [M] which further corroborated
the molecular formula InBr
1
1
1
1
a
2 20 28 2 2
C H N O .
CH
2
2
e
Considering the failure of any indium(III)–bipyridine catalyst
lacking the additional hydroxyl groups, it is most likely that the
chiral catalyst exhibits a combined Lewis acid–Brønsted acid
activity, with the Lewis acidic indium center activating the epoxide
and the hydroxyl protons possibly forming a hydrogen bond to the
incoming thiol, thereby guiding it to the epoxide.
4-Cl-C
4-Cl-C
6
H
H
4
84 (4l)
67 (4m)
e
6
4
CH
Reaction conditions: 10 mol% InBr
3
, 11 mol% bipyridine 1a,
2 2
.5 equiv. thiol, CH Cl , rt, 16 h. Isolated yields of chromato-
c
b
1
graphed material. Determined from chiral HPLC analysis (see
d
supplementary information). The absolute configuration of 4b was
proven to be 1R,2R through conversion into the corresponding
known sulfone; the configurations of all other products were
1
1
In conclusion, we have devised a novel chiral catalyst for the
highly enantioselective thiolysis of aromatic meso-epoxides, with
aromatic as well as aliphatic thiols furnishing 1,2-mercapto
alcohols in good yields and excellent enantioselectivities. Most
importantly, there is no restriction to a specific thiol. A crystal
structure analysis of the chiral catalyst reveals a pentagonal-
bipyramidal coordination geometry around the indium center with
both nitrogen and oxygen atoms coordinating to the metal.
Additional hydrogen-bonding between the catalyst and the
incoming nucleophile appears to activate and direct the incoming
nucleophile to the indium-bound epoxide.
e
assigned by analogy. Reaction time: 6 d.
enantioselectivities (entries 7–13). Unfortunately, aliphatic meso-
epoxides currently give rise to only low enantioselectivity in the
indium–bipyridine-catalyzed thiolysis.
The product 1,2-mercapto alcohols 4 may be employed as
substrates for desulfurization reactions, furnishing chiral, highly
12
enantiomerically enriched alcohols. Thus, nickel boride reduction
of 4a afforded alcohol 5 in good yield and almost identical
enantiomeric excess as 4a, proving that the reaction had not
affected the stereochemistry of the adjacent carbinol center
Generous financial support was provided by the Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft (Schn 441/3-2). We thank Wacker AG
for providing chemicals and Dr Claudia Birkemeyer (University of
Leipzig) for recording the ESI-MS spectra of the indium–
bipyridine complex.
(
Scheme 1).
Accordingly, the sequential thiolysis–desulfurization of meso-
epoxides constitutes an elegant alternative to the still elusive
13
enantioselective hydride addition to epoxides.
A single crystal of the indium(III)–bipyridine complex suitable
for X-ray crystallography was obtained from tetrahydrofuran–
Notes and references
14
+
O] complex (the
H
2
O solution. The cationic [InBr ?1a?H
2
2
1 Reviews: (a) C. Schneider, Synthesis, 2006, 3919; (b) I. M. Pastor and
M. Yus, Curr. Org. Chem., 2005, 9, 1; (c) E. N. Jacobsen and M. H. Wu,
in Comprehensive Asymmetric Catalysis, ed. E. N. Jacobsen, A. Pfaltz
and H. Yamamoto, Springer, Berlin, 1999, vol. 3, p. 1309.
2 (a) X. L. Hou, J. Wu, L. X. Dai, L. J. Xia and M. H. Tang,
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 1998, 9, 1747; (b) S. Sagawa, H. Abe, Y. Hase
and T. Inaba, J. Org. Chem., 1999, 64, 4962; (c) A. Sekine, T. Ohshima
and M. Shibasaki, Tetrahedron, 2002, 58, 75; (d) G. Bartoli, M. Basco,
A. Carlone, M. Locatelli, M. Massaccesi, P. Melchiorre and L. Sambri,
Org. Lett., 2004, 6, 2173; (e) F. Carree, R. Gil and J. Collin, Tetrahedron
Lett., 2004, 45, 7749; (f) F. Carree, R. Gil and J. Collin, Org. Lett., 2005,
bromide counter anion is omitted for clarity) depicted in Fig. 2
is characterized with a pentagonal-bipyramidal coordination
geometry around the indium(III) center, which is tetracoordinated
by the bipyridine ligand 1a through both nitrogen and oxygen
atoms. Significantly, both hydroxyl protons are still attached to the
catalyst. The crystal structure very closely resembles the structure
1
5
of the scandium(III)–bipyridine catalyst, and both catalysts also
exhibit the same sense of asymmetric induction in epoxide-opening
7, 1023.
8
reactions. Additional high resolution ESI-MS measurements gave
3
4
(a) W. M. Nugent, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1992, 114, 2768; (b) L. E.
Martinez, J. L. Leighton, D. H. Carsten and E. N. Jacobsen, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1995, 117, 5897.
(a) E. N. Jacobsen, F. Kakiuchi, R. G. Konsler, J. F. Larrow and
M. Tokunaga, Tetrahedron Lett., 1997, 38, 773; (b) S. Matsunaga,
J. Das, J. Roels, E. M. Vogl, N. Yamamoto, T. Iida, K. Yamaguchi and
M. Shibasaki, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 2252.
5
(a) B. M. Cole, K. D. Shimizu, C. A. Krueger, J. P. A. Harrity,
M. L. Snapper and A. H. Hoveyda, Angew. Chem., 1996, 108, 1776,
(Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1996, 35, 1668); (b) K. D. Shimizu,
Scheme 1 Desulfurization of 1,2-mercapto alcohol 4a.
This journal is ß The Royal Society of Chemistry 2007
Chem. Commun., 2007, 2756–2758 | 2757