Organic Letters
Letter
catalyst to activate the C−F bond and a rhodium biphenyl
complex as the triplet sensitizer (Figure 1B).7 Similar to the
previously reported thermal methods, a transmetalation step
was involved in this process as well. At this point,
straightforward photocatalytic borylation of a C−F bond in
polyfluoroarenes is extremely appealing but challenging.
With regard to photoredox catalysis, various C−F bond
functionalizations, including arylation, alkylation, and hydro-
defluorination, have been accomplished in recent years.8 The
generally accepted mechanism for these transformations in the
selective activation of the C−F bond mainly depends on the
generation of a polyfluoroaryl radical via a photocatalytic single
electron transfer (SET) process, despite the high bond
dissociation energy (BDE) of the C−F bond.9 Thus, we
speculated that if a boryl radical could be formed
simultaneously, the corresponding radical−radical coupling
could take place to realize the borylation of polyfluoroarenes.
Obviously, seeking suitable sources of boryl radicals is crucial
to the success of this hypothesis. It was disclosed that NHC-
boranes could serve as reliable sources of boryl radicals
through photocatalytic hydrogen atom transfer (HAT)
processes.10 On the basis of the oxidation potential of NHC-
borane and its low BDE for the B−H bond (74.5 kcal/mol),11
we speculated that the B−H bond of NHC-borane might be
directly scissored via a SET process to give the corresponding
boryl radical. Thus, we rationalized that the direct borylation of
polyfluoroarenes with NHC-boranes via a photoinduced SET
process could be feasible. As part of our ongoing interest in
photocatalysis,12 we were delighted to achieve the first
transformation of polyfluoroarenes into NHC-boryl polyfluor-
oarenes under photoredox conditions (Figure 1C). More
importantly, mechanistic studies indicated that this borylation
reaction presumably proceeds through an unexpected radical
addition pathway.
(dtbpy)][PF6] and [Ir(ppy)2(dtbbpy)][PF6] were able to
facilitate the transformation to give the desired borylated
perfluoropyridine effectively (entries 1 and 2). Ir-
(ppy)2(dtbbpy)PF6 was proven to be the optimum photo-
catalyst, furnishing the desired product 3a (CCDC 1966819)
in 94% yield. Expectedly, both light and the photocatalyst were
enssential to this transformation (entries 5 and 6). K2HPO4
acted as a base to neutralize the HF byproduct, thus improving
the chemical yield (entry 7). Further exploration showed that
increasing the concentrations of the reactants appropriately
could further improve the reaction efficiency (entry 8).
However, reducing the amount of 2a led to a prolonged
reaction time (entry 9).
With the established reaction conditions, we sought to
define the generality of the methodology by exploring the
scope of polyfluoroarenes. As illustrated in Scheme 1, a variety
of polyfluoroarylboron compounds were prepared through this
photocatalytic protocol in good to excellent yields. Fluoroar-
enes with different degrees of fluorination were well-tolerated.
For 1,2,3,4,5-pentafluorobenzenes, functional groups including
N(Bz)2, MeO, CH2CN, Cl, CF3, CN, esters, ketone, and amide
were compatible with this photoredox-catalyzed system with
good reaction efficiencies (3b−n). It is worth mentioning that
the nature of the substituent on the 1,2,3,4,5-pentafluor-
obenzene significantly impacted the regioslectivity. Specifically,
electron-donating groups, such as MeO and alkyl groups,
resulted in lower regioslectivity, while strong electron-with-
drawing substituents consistently provided good to excellent
regioslectivities. Unexpectedly, bis(perfluorophenyl)dimethyl-
silane (2q) underwent a desilylation process to afford 3b in
82% yield. Interestingly, monoborylated tris(perfluorophenyl)-
phosphane 3r was successfully obtained in excellent yield
(92%). Unfortunately, the substrates bearing OH, dicyano, or
NO2 (2u−x) were unable to deliver the desired product under
the standard reaction conditions. Pleasingly, the scaled-up
reaction of 1a and 2a smoothly delivered 3a in 86% yield
simply through a single run of filtration and recrystallization.
Meanwhile, treatment of polyfluoroarylboron compound 3a
with Selectfluor furnished NHC-difluoroborane 3aa, which
served as a bench-stable organoboron reagent with potential
for synthetic utilization.3a
With the survey of radical receptors established, we next
shifted our attention to other NHC-boryl radical precursors,
using perfluoropyridine as the model radical receptor (Scheme
2). The substituents on the NHC framework slightly interfered
with the reaction efficiency, smoothly furnishing the desired
products 4a−e. Meanwhile, other types of Lewis base-based
boranes (LB-BH3) were also evaluated. It was found that
pyridine−borane derivatives worked under these conditions as
well, affording the corresponding products 4f and 4g in good
yields. However, no desired products were detected for Et3N−
BH3 and Ph3P−BH3, likely because the B−H bonds in these
LB-BH3 could not be oxidized directly by the photoexcited
catalyst.
To gain insights into the reaction mechanism, we carried out
combined computational and experimental studies (Figure 2).
On the basis of our studies, a plausible reaction pathway
through radical addition is proposed as illustrated in Figure 2a.
The photocatalytic transformation begins with the photo-
excitation of [IrIII]+ to *[IrIII]+, followed by SET with 1a to
produce a reducing [IrII] species and NHC-boryl radical I,
along with a proton transfer from NHC-BH3 to [HPO4]2−.
The concerted proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) step
We commenced our survey by evaluating the reaction
between NHC-BH3 (1a) and perfluoropyridine (2a) in the
presence of the photocatalyst and K2HPO4 as the base in
MeCN under irradiation by a 30 W blue LED at room
temperature (Table 1). Pleasingly, both [Ir(dFCF3ppy)2-
Table 1. Optimization of the Photocatalyzed Reaction
a
Conditions
entry
cat
base
time yield (%)
1
2
3
4
5
[Ir(dFCF3ppy)2(dtbpy)][PF6]
[Ir(ppy)2(dtbbpy)][PF6]
[Ru(bpy)3][PF6]
Ir(ppy)3
−
[Ir(ppy)2(dtbbpy)][PF6]
[Ir(ppy)2(dtbbpy)][PF6]
[Ir(ppy)2(dtbbpy)][PF6]
[Ir(ppy)2(dtbbpy)][PF6]
K2HPO4
K2HPO4
K2HPO4
K2HPO4
K2HPO4
K2HPO4
−
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
36
32
94
nr
trace
nr
trace
32
96
b
6
7
c
8
d
K2HPO4
K2HPO4
9
85
a
Reaction conditions: 1a (0.2 mmol, 1.0 equiv), 2a (0.3 mmol, 1.5
equiv), K2HPO4 (0.3 mmol, 1.5 equiv), catalyst (2 mmol %), MeCN
b
(2 mL), 30 W blue LED, argon atmosphere, rt, 24 h. Without LED.
c
d
Performed on a 0.4 mmol scale of 1a with MeCN (2 mL). 2a (0.24
mmol, 1.2 equiv).
B
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX