in 70% yield. Hydrolysis of the ester functionalities using
lithium hydroxide, followed by deprotection of the amino
moiety, generates the bis acid 11. However, attempts to
transform the isoxazole ring into the target vinylogous amide
using standard conditions, such as hydrogenation or reduction
with sodium in liquid ammonia,9,12 produce exclusively the
saturated alcohol 12 as a mixture of four diastereoisomers.
Formation of the vinylogous amide moiety is possible by
treatment of isoxazole 10 with a catalytic amount of
molybdenum hexacarbonyl and 1 equiv of water in refluxing
acetonitrile.13 Subsequent exposure of 13 to excess trifluoro-
acetic acid (TFA) in dichloromethane for 1 h generates a
1:1 mixture of cyclic and open-chain vinylogous amides 14
and 15 in 90% yield. The yield of 15 can be improved to
80% by using 5 equiv of TFA and careful monitoring of the
reaction by TLC. The cyclic derivative 14 could arise from
Michael addition of the nitrogen liberated by removal of the
tert-butoxycarbonyl moiety onto the R,â-unsaturated alkene
followed by subsequent loss of ammonia. Hydrolysis of
diester 14 using lithium hydroxide followed by workup gives
5 in 90% yield. Compound 15 is unstable at room temper-
ature and is therefore best transformed immediately into the
dilithium salt 6 (85% yield). Acidification of 6 leads rapidly
to formation of the cyclized derivative 5; therefore this
compound was stored as its dilithium derivative. Vinylogous
amide 5 is an interesting compound in terms of functional
group density and structural fragments (ketone, primary
amine, primary enamine) that would be incompatible or
would decompose in water were it not for the stabilization
afforded by the extended conjugation.
With vinylogous amides 5 and 6 available, DAP D-
dehydrogenase was purified from Bacillus spaericus IFO
3525 as previously reported.7a,14 In addition, DAP epimerase
was isolated from an Escherichia coli mutant BL21(DE3)
pLysS using a modified procedure.6a,15 DAP D-dehydrogenase
assay at pH 7.8 employs the reverse reaction, wherein
NADP+ oxidatively deaminates the D-amino acid center of
meso-DAP (1) to L-tetrahydrodipicolinate (L-THDP) with
generation of NADPH, thereby allowing continuous spec-
trophotometric assay at 340 nm.7a,15 The stability of 6 during
the enzyme assays can be monitored by TLC which reveals
that cyclization begins to be detectable after 3 h in the buffer
solution. Hence, each assay employed freshly dissolved
inhibitor. No isomerization of the double bond geometry of
6 could be detected. Compounds 5 and 6 are not substrates
for DAP D-dehydrogenase and show only poor reversible
inhibition of DAP D-dehydrogenase, with IC50 values in the
range of 400-450 µM. This is surprisingly weak binding
given that these molecules possess much of the functionality
present in the substrates (THDP and meso-DAP) and putative
imine intermediate. Although the presence of an extra oxygen
at the center of 6 could generate unfavorable steric interac-
tions with the enzyme, a more likely cause for failure of
effective binding to DAP dehydrogenase is the coplanarity
of the vinylogous amide system. Crystallographic studies
reveal that the isoxazoline 2 and the unsaturated analogue 3
bind in the active site of the DAP D-dehydrogenase with
conformations which for analogues 5 and 6 could require
bond rotation in the coplanar portions.7b,8b
Inhibition studies with DAP epimerase involve a coupled
enzyme assay at pH 7.8, whereby meso-DAP (1) generated
by the epimerase from LL-DAP is transformed by DAP
D-dehydrogenase to produce L-THDP and NADPH, which
is followed spectrophotometrically.15 The results show that,
as expected, 5 is a very poor inhibitor of DAP epimerase.
Disappointingly, the acyclic vinylogous amide 6 is also a
weak competitive inhibitor (IC50 of 500 µM) of this enzyme
despite having most of its atoms in locations that might be
expected to mimic the transition state or intermediate DAP-
derived R-anion. Although a crystal structure of active DAP
epimerase with a substrate analogue in the active site is not
yet available,16 the poor binding to DAP epimerase may be
again be due to the planarity of the vinylogous amide system
as well as consequent reduced basicity of the amino group
on the sp2 carbon. Initially it seemed that an enzyme-induced
conformational twist around the C-3 to C-4 bond in 6 or
around the C-2 to C-3 bond in its tautomer 6a could generate
reactive functionality and trigger addition of an active site
thiol group, but the required tautomerization has not been
observed (Scheme 3).
Scheme 3. Potential Tautomerization of 6 with Attack by
DAP Epimerase
Fortunately, the cyclic vinylogous amide 5, which shows
considerable structural similarity to L-DHDP proved to be a
good inhibitor of L-DHDP reductase. This enzyme, which
was isolated from E. coli, catalyzes the transfer of a hydrogen
from NADPH to the γ-position of L-DHDP to give L-
tetrahydrodipicolinic acid (THDP).17 Inhibition studies dem-
onstrate that 5 is a reversible competitive inhibitor of the
DHDP reductase with respect to L-DHDP with an inhibition
constant (Ki) of 32 µM. Hence 5 is comparable to the most
potent competitive inhibitor of DHDP reductase reported thus
far, the fully planar dipicolinic acid (16) (Ki 26 µM). Since
(10) Collet, S.; Bauchat, P.; Danion-Bougot, R.; Danion, D. Tetrahe-
dron: Asymmetry 1998, 9, 2121-2131.
(11) Kozikowski, A. P.; Adamczyk, M. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 366-
372.
(12) Alberola, A.; Andres, C.; Gonzalez Ortega, A.; Pedrosa, R. J.
Heterocycl. Chem. 1984, 21, 1575-1576.
(13) (a) Nitta, M.; Kobayashi, T. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1982,
877-878. (b) Baraldi, P. G.; Barco, A.; Benetti, S.; Guarneri, M.;
Manfredini, S.; Pillini, G. P.; Simoni, D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26, 5319-
5322.
(14) Misono, H.; Soda, K. J. Biol. Chem. 1980, 255, 10599-10605.
(15) Song, Y. H.; Niederer, D.; Lane-Bell, P.; Lam, L. K. P.; Crawley,
S.; Palcic, M. M.; Pickard, M. A.; Pruess, D. L.; Vederas, J. C. J. Org.
Chem. 1994, 59, 5784-5793.
(16) The reported crystal structure of DAP epimerase (ref 4) is of an
inactive form wherein the two thiols are linked as a disulfide.
(17) Scapin, G.; Blanchard, J. S.; Sacchettini, J. C. Biochemistry 1995,
34, 3502-3512.
Org. Lett., Vol. 2, No. 24, 2000
3859