ACS Catalysis
Research Article
atomic resolution that can be achieved via TEM imaging, this
approach is often the only suitable technique to study the size
and dispersion of supported nanoparticles at the nanometer
scale. Unfortunately, no direct link between these offline
measurements and the catalytic performance can be made; thus,
the catalytically active nanoparticles cannot be discriminated
this, the multiwell could be filled with the reaction solution
using a micropipette and placed in the reactor. Since thermal
hydrogenation of 4-nitrostyrene results in the formation of the
unwanted 4-ethylnitrobenzene and little 4-vinylaniline, in each
run several wells were not filled with a catalyst particle to
account for this blank conversion and some wells were only
filled with solvent to ensure that no cross contamination had
occurred. To lower solvent evaporation as much as possible, the
high-boiling N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMA) was used as a
solvent and n-hexadecane as an internal standard for
quantitative GC analysis. Optimization of reaction conditions
led to the use of 18 μL of a 33 mM 4-NSt solution in each
microwell, with hydrogenation performed under 20 bar of H2
on heating to 110 °C for 2.5 h in a Parr reactor filled with 3 mL
of DMA. Analysis of the reaction products was carried out
using a gas chromatograph (Shimadzu, CP-Sil 5, FID detector)
after rinsing the wells two times with pure DMA.
20,21
from spectator species.
In this study we report that typical incipient wetness
impregnation results in an unexpected 10-fold variation in
silver loading between individual silica gel support granules,
leading to intersupport granule variations in number and size of
the silver nanocatalysts. To validate the impact thereof on the
catalytic performance, the selective reduction of 4-nitrostyrene
to 4-vinylaniline was chosen. The aforementioned interparticle
heterogeneity in silver loading leads to 100-fold variations in
hydrogenation performance, and by using optical microscopy, it
is possible to identify the optimal silver loading of the best-
performing supported metal catalyst granules.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
■
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
Compositional Heterogeneities at the Micro- and
Nanoscale. Supported silver catalysts (5−6 wt % Ag) on silica
gel were synthesized via standard incipient wetness impregna-
■
Catalyst Preparation. An aqueous AgNO3 solution,
equaling the total pore volume of the support material, was
added dropwise to dried silica gel (Sigma-Aldrich, Fluka 60752)
until a slurry formed. After equilibration at room temperature
the impregnated samples were dried overnight in air in an oven
at 100 °C and finally calcined at 500 °C for 2 h. Control
4
,17
tion.
During calcination of the white silver nitrate
impregnated silica powder, silver oxide was formed and
subsequently at temperatures above 400 °C completely
22,23
decomposed into metallic silver.
The resulting silica-
supported silver nanoparticle catalyst powder has a typical
yellowish appearance and looks seemingly homogeneous.
However, close inspection using optical microscopy revealed
an unexpected variability in color between different support
granules (Figure 1A−C); to our knowledge this interparticle
samples were obtained by calcining commercial AgNO on
3
silica gel (Sigma-Aldrich 248762) in air at 500 °C for 2 h. In
this work this catalyst is referred to as “commercial Ag/SiO2”.
Optical Microscopy. Images were obtained via the
eyepieces using an adapter from Micro-Tech-Lab (Austria) to
connect a Canon EOS5D color camera to an Olympus BX51
Upright microscope with a standard mercury lamp, equipped
with infinity corrected air objectives 4× (0.16 N.A.) and 20×
(0.40 N.A.). Color sorting of individual supported silver catalyst
granules was performed on a stereomicroscope (Leica
M165FC).
Scanning Electron Microscopy. High-resolution SEM
images were obtained with a Nova NanoSEM 450 instrument
(FEI). SEM-EDX was conducted using a FEI XL30FEG
electron microscope equipped with an EDAX detector. Spectral
analysis and quantification were performed with Genesis 4.61
software. Samples were mounted onto a copper TEM grid (300
mesh, Agar Scientific) fixed on a gold-coated cover slide which
was then immobilized on to an aluminum stub using carbon
sticker. These were imaged without any further sample
modification.
Figure 1. Interparticle heterogeneity in Ag/SiO at the support
2
granule level revealed by optical microscopy: (A−C) silver on silica gel
obtained via typical incipient wetness impregnation; (D−F)
commercial AgNO on silica gel after calcination on the macroscale
3
Catalytic Performance Testing at the Bulk Level. Bulk
hydrogenation reactions were performed in high-pressure 15
mL TOP reactors and a 100 mL Parr reactor (2 h, 110 °C, 20
(A, D) and microscale (B, E) (C, F) Interparticle heterogeneity (n =
2
50) illustrated with pie diagrams. The colors represent the red color
bar of H , 0.35 mol % of Ag, 70 mM 4-nitrostyrene in DMA,
2
and 500 rpm unless stated otherwise). Analysis of the reaction
products was carried out using a gas chromatograph (Shimadzu,
CP-Sil 5, FID detector), and n-tetradecane was added as
internal standard for quantitative GC analysis. Identification of
the compounds was carried out using GC-MS.
Catalytic Performance Testing at the Single Support
Particle Level. Individual single-granule hydrogenation
reactions were performed by use of a multiwell placed in a
color heterogeneity has not been reported so far for supported
metal catalysts. An even more pronounced interparticle color
heterogeneity, ranging from transparent to yellow to red-
brown, was observed in a supported silver catalyst (6 wt % Ag)
made by calcining commercial AgNO on silica gel obtained
3
from Sigma-Aldrich (Figure 1D−F). Strikingly, within one large
support granule of about 100 μm in diameter no significant
color variation was observed.
Since pure silica powder is optically transparent, also after a
similar heat treatment, the observed color formation must be
1
00 mL Parr reactor, enabling 21 reactions in parallel. Prior to
the catalytic reaction, single support particles were carefully
placed one by one in the different wells via an eyelash
manipulator and a stereomicroscope (Leica M165FC). After
6
691
ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 6690−6695