RSC Advances
Paper
Fig. 7 shows the effect of different concentrations on n-i-p
device performances determined by J–V measurements. When
6 F. Yang, D.-W. Kang and Y. –S. Kim, RSC Adv., 2017, 7, 19030–
19038.
7 A. Yusoff, P. Gao and M. K. Nazeeruddin, Coord. Chem. Rev.,
2018, 373, 258–294.
8 A. Kojima, K. Teshima, Y. Shirai and T. Miyasaka, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 6050–6051.
9 H. Kim, C. Lee, J. Im, K. Lee, T. Moehl, A. Marchioro,
S. Moon, R. Humphry-Baker, J. Yum, J. E. Moser,
M. Gr ¨a tzel and N. Park, Sci. Rep., 2012, 2, 591.
ꢁ1
using JW7 of 30 mg mL , the value of photocurrent (JSC) drops
sharply, and the highest PCE is only 2.23%. The PCE increases
to 8.65% when the concentration of JW7 is reduced to 20 mg
ꢁ1
mL . Furthermore, the device performances get even better
when the concentration of HTM solution decreases to 10 mg
ꢁ1
mL , and the PCE can reach 9.36%.
1
0 W. Yang, J. H. Noh, N. J. Jeon, Y. C. Kim, S. I. Ryu, J. Seo and
S. Seok, Science, 2015, 348, 1234–1237.
4
Conclusions
1
1 F. Santiago, J. Bisquert, L. Cevey, P. Chen, M. Wang,
S. M. Zakeeruddin and M. Gr ¨a tzel, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009,
In this study, three triphenylamine derivatives containing
ferrocene were synthesized and used as organic HTMs for
fabricating efficient PSCs. The substitutes on their structures
are different, which are triphenylamine for JW6, bis(4-
131, 558–562.
1
1
2 N. J. Jeon, H. G. Lee, Y. C. Kim, J. Seo, J. H. Noh, J. Lee and
S. Seok, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 7837–7840.
0
methoxyphenyl)methane for JW7 and 4,4 -methylenebis(N,N-
3 C. S. Ponseca, E. M. Hutter, P. Piatkowski, B. Cohen,
T. Pascher, A. Douhal, A. Yartsev, V. Sundstr ¨o m and
T. J. Savenije, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137, 16043–16048.
4 M. Jung, S. R. Raga, L. K. Ono and Y. Qi, Sci. Rep., 2015, 5,
dimethylaniline) for JW8. The maximum absorption wave-
lengths of the three compounds are around 370–380 nm and
that of JW8 (378 nm) has a red shi when compared with JW6
1
(372 nm) and JW7 (372 nm). Theoretical calculations show that
9863.
JW7 and JW8 have a more planar conjugated structure. The
ꢂ
15 A. Marchioro, J. Teuscher, D. Friedrich, M. Kunst and
three HTMs display T
g
values beyond 110 C. SCLC results show
R. Krol, Nat. Photonics, 2014, 8, 250–255.
that JW7 exhibits the highest hole mobility among the studied
HTMs. In the inverted p-i-n-type of PSCs (ITO/HTM/perovskite/
PCBM/BCP/Ag), JW7 shows better photovoltaic performance
than JW6 and JW8 under the same conditions, leading to a PCE
of 11.43% (standard PEDOT, 12.86%). In the conventional n-i-p
1
1
1
6 X. Zhao and M. Wang, Materials Today Energy, 2018, 7, 208–
20.
7 Y. Wang, T. Su, H. Tsai, T. Wei and Y. Chi, Sci. Rep., 2017, 7,
859.
2
7
8 F. Zhang, S. Wang, H. Zhu, X. Liu, H. Liu, X. Li, Y. Xiao,
S. M. Zakeeruddin and M. Gr ¨a tzel, ACS Energy Lett., 2018,
2
device of FTO/TiO /perovskite/HTM/Ag, the optimal concen-
ꢁ1
tration of HTM is 10 mg mL . The corresponding highest PCE
for these n-i-p cells was 9.36%, which were fabricated using JW7
and adding TBP as the dopant. Therefore, ferrocene-containing
materials have a great potential in perovskite solar cells, and
there is a lot of work to be done in the development of these
ferrocene-based HTMs for fabricating high-efficiency PSCs.
3
, 1145–1152.
1
9 Y. Wu, Z. Wang, M. Liang, H. Cheng, M. Li, L. Liu, B. Wang
and J. Wu, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2018, 10, 17883–
17895.
2
0 K. Rakstys, A. Abate, M. I. Dar, P. Gao, V. Jankauskas,
G. Jacopin, E. Kamarauskas, S. Kazim, S. Ahmad,
M. Gr ¨a tzel and M. K. Nazeeruddin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015,
Conflicts of interest
1
37, 16172–16178.
2
2
1 R. Grisorio, B. Roose, S. Colella, A. Listorti, G. P. Suranna
and A. Abate, ACS Energy Lett., 2017, 2, 1029–1034.
2 M. S. Kang, S. D. Sung, I. T. Choi, H. Kim, M. Hong, J. Kim,
W. Lee and H. K. Kim, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2015, 7,
There are no conicts to declare.
Acknowledgements
2
2213–22217.
This study was supported by the National Natural Science
Foundation of China (21506164, 21671148, and 21576215).
2
3 N. J. Jeon, H. Na, E. H. Jung, T. Y. Yang, Y. G. Lee, G. Kim,
H. Shin, S. Seok, J. Lee and J. Seo, Nat. Energy, 2018, 3,
682–689.
2
4 N. J. Jeon, J. Lee, J. H. Noh, M. K. Nazeeruddin and
M. Gr ¨a tzel, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 19087–19090.
Notes and references
1
N. Arora, M. Ibrahim Dar, A. Hinderhofer, N. Pellet, 25 H. Nishimura, N. Ishida, A. Shimazaki, A. Wakamiya,
F. Schreiber, S. M. Zakeeruddin and M. Gr ¨a tzel, Science,
017, 358, 768–771.
A. Saeki, L. T. Scott and Y. Murata, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015,
137, 15656–15659.
2
2
3
H. J. Snaith, Nat. Mater., 2018, 17, 372–376.
K. Mahmood, S. Sarwar and M. T. Mehran, RSC Adv., 2017, 7,
26 W. Ke, P. Priyanka, S. Vegiraju, C. C. Stoumpos,
I. Spanopoulos, C. Soe, T. J. Marks, M. C. Chen and
M. G. Kanatzidis, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2018, 140, 388–393.
17044–17062.
4
5
T. Salim, S. Sun, Y. Abe, A. Krishna, A. C. Grimsdalea and 27 A. Ghosh, S. Mishra, S. Giri, S. M. Mobin, A. Bera and
Y. M. Lam, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2015, 3, 8943–8969.
S. Chatterjee, Organometallics, 2018, 37, 1999–2002.
S. Wang, W. Yuan and Y. S. Meng, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces,
2015, 7, 24791–24798.
222 | RSC Adv., 2019, 9, 216–223
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019