Journal of the American Chemical Society
Communication
of the chiral directors and the chiral environment of the
channels, like those of Ni-PYIs.
(15) Banerjee, M.; Das, S.; Yoon, M.; Choi, H. J.; Hyun, M. H.; Park,
S. M.; Seo, G.; Kim, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 7524−7525.
(16) Mizuno, N.; Kamata, K. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2011, 255, 2358−
Experiments on the asymmetric dihydroxylation also revealed
that the presence of excess chiral adduct L-PYI in the
aforementioned control reaction (entry 7) led to an increased
conversion but a slightly lower enantioselectivity (ee of 16%) of
the product. It seems that the formation of hydrogen-bonding
interactions between the protonated pyrrolidine rings absorbed
2
(
2
(
2
(
370.
17) Long, D. L.; Tsunashima, R.; Cronin, L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
010, 49, 1736−1758.
18) Dolbecq, A.; Dumas, E.; Mayer, C. R.; Mialane, P. Chem. Rev.
010, 110, 6009−6048.
19) Zou, C.; Zhang, Z. J.; Xu, X.; Gong, Q. H.; Li, J.; Wu, C. D. J.
5−
within the pores and the [BW O ] anions could form a
Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 87−90.
1
2
40
novel mode for activation of the oxidant and improve the
catalytic activity. However, under the unconfined conditions,
these interactions occur in multiple ways with differing
(20) Ma, F. J.; Liu, S. X.; Sun, C. Y.; Liang, D. D.; Ren, G. J.; Wei, F.;
Chen, Y. G.; Su, Z. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 4178−4181.
(21) Song, J.; Luo, Z.; Britt, D. K.; Furukawa, H.; Yaghi, O. M.;
5
−
Hardcastle, K. I.; Hill, C. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 16839−
orientations of the ammonium salt and the [BW O ]
1
2
40
1
6846.
anion, which is likely to be deleterious to the enantioselectivity.
In contrast, in the case of Ni-PYIs as catalysts, the interactions
between them are confined and fixed orientationally. In other
words, the enantioselectivities of Ni-PYIs are superior to those
of simply mixing the corresponding MOFs with the chiral
adduct originating from the integration of POM and chiral
(
22) Hashimoto, T.; Maruoka, K. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 5656−5682.
(23) Yin, P. C.; Li, D.; Liu, T. B. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 7368−
7
383.
(24) Dias, L. C.; Marchi, A. A.; Ferreira, A. B.; Aguilar, A. M. J. Org.
Chem. 2008, 73, 6299−6311.
(25) Mizuno, N.; Yamaguchi, K.; Kamata, K. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2005,
249, 1944−1956.
3
0,44
directors into a single MOF.
(26) Duncan, D. C.; Chambers, R. C.; Hecht, E.; Hill, C. L. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 681−691.
27) Matsumoto, K.; Oguma, T.; Katsuki, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
009, 48, 7432−7435.
28) Marigo, M.; Franzen
K. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 6964−6965.
(29) Kawamoto, R.; Uchida, S.; Mizuno, N. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005,
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
Supporting Information
Text, figures, tables, and CIF files giving crystal data,
■
(
2
(
*
S
́
, J.; Poulsen, T. B.; Zhuang, W.; Jørgensen,
1
27, 10560−10567.
30) Duan, C. Y.; Wei, M. L.; Guo, D.; He, C.; Meng, Q. J. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 3321−3330.
31) Data for Ni-PYI1: C H BN NiO W , M = 3610.63,
(
AUTHOR INFORMATION
■
*
(
3
8
52
11
42 12
r
monoclinic, space group C2, a = 25.266(3) Å, b = 11.490(1) Å, c =
3
Notes
22.880(2) Å, β = 90.49(1)°, V = 6642(1) Å , Z = 4, 18459 total
reflections, 11426 unique reflections (Rint = 0.034), final R1 (with I >
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
2
σ(I)) = 0.038, wR2 (all data) = 0.0792, S = 1.021.
(
32) Lin, X. M.; Li, T. T.; Chen, L. F.; Zhang, L.; Su, C. Y. Dalton
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
■
(
Trans. 2012, 41, 10422−10429.
We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the NSFC
Nos. 91122031 and 21025102).
(33) Spek, A. L. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2003, 36, 7−13.
(34) The molecular size (8.3 × 6.5 Å) was calculated by using the
program Chem3D.
(
2
(
35) Jonsson, S. Y.; Farnegardh, K.; Backvall, J. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
001, 123, 1365−1371.
36) Andersson, M. A.; Epple, R.; Fokin, V. V.; Sharpless, K. B.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 472−475.
37) Nielsen, L. P. C.; Stevenson, C. P.; Blackmond, D. G.; Jacobsen,
E. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 1360−1368.
38) Zhu, C. F.; Yuan, G. Z.; Chen, X.; Yang, Z. W.; Cui, Y. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 8058−8061.
39) Aggrawal, V. K.; Lopin, C.; Dandrinelli, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
003, 125, 7596−7601.
40) Wu, P. Y.; He, C.; Wang, J.; Peng, X. J.; Li, X. Z.; An, Y. L.;
REFERENCES
■
(
1) Melchiorre, P.; Marigo, M.; Carlone, A.; Bartoli, G. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 6138−6171.
2) Piovesana, S.; Scarpino Schietroma, D. M.; Bella, M. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 6216−6232.
3) D’Souza, D. M.; Muller, T. J. J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007, 36, 1095−
104.
4) Dondoni, A.; Massi, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 4638−
660.
5) Marinetti, A.; Jullien, H.; Voituriez, A. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41,
(
(
(
1
(
4
(
4
(
(
̈
(
(
2
(
884−4908.
Duan, C. Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 14991−14999.
41) Crassous, J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 830−845.
6) Allen, A. E.; MacMillan, D. W. C. Chem. Sci. 2012, 3, 633−658.
(
(
7) Xiao, W.; Jin, R. H.; Cheng, T. Y.; Xia, D. Q.; Yao, H.; Gao, F.;
42) Data for Ni-PYI2: C H BN NiO W , M = 3610.63,
3
8
52
11
42 12
r
Deng, B. X.; Liu, G. H. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 11898−11900.
8) An, J.; Farha, O. K.; Hupp, J. T.; Pohl, E.; Yeh, J. I.; Rosi, N. L.
Nat. Commun. 2012, 604−606.
9) Perry, J. J., IV; Perman, J. A.; Zaworotko, M. J. Chem. Soc. Rev.
009, 38, 1400−1417.
10) Ma, L. Q.; Falkowski, J. M.; Abney, C.; Lin, W. B. Nat. Chem.
010, 2, 838−846.
11) Jiang, H. L.; Feng, D. W.; Liu, T. F.; Li, J. R.; Zhou, H. C. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 14690−14693.
12) Yoon, M.; Srirambalaji, R.; Kim, K. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112,
196−1231.
13) Seo, J. S.; Wang, D.; Lee, H.; Jun, S. I.; Oh, J.; Jeon, Y. J.; Kim,
K. Nature 2000, 404, 982−986.
14) Cohen, S. M. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 970−1000.
monoclinic, space group C2, a = 25.187(4) Å, b = 11.483(2) Å, c =
(
3
2
2.862(4) Å, β = 90.37(1)°, V = 6612(2) Å , Z = 4, 18571 total
reflections, 11366 unique reflections (Rint = 0.048), final R1 (with I >
σ(I)) = 0.0490, wR2 (all data) = 0.1073, S = 1.003.
43) Data for Ni-BPY: C H45.50BCl0.50N Ni O W , M = 3810.62,
(
2
(
2
2
(
50
10
2
42 12
r
monoclinic, space group P2 , a = 13.414(1) Å, b = 14.924(1) Å, c =
1
3
2
0.062(1) Å, β = 102.67(1)°, V = 3918.5(2) Å , Z = 2, 18409 total
reflections, 10227 unique reflections (Rint = 0.0621), final R1 (with I >
σ(I)) = 0.0576, wR2 (all data) = 0.1412, S = 1.000.
44) Wu, P. Y.; He, C.; Wang, J.; Peng, X. J.; Li, X. Z.; An, Y. L.;
(
2
(
(
1
(
Duan, C. Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 14991−14999.
(
1
0189
dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja401758c | J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 10186−10189