Lipase-Catalyzed 1,6-Acylation of d-Mannitol
745
and
case of the pyridine reaction), water, and brine. The organic layer was
then dried over MgSO4, filtered, and the solvent removed under reduced
pressure. The solid that remained was triturated with hexane.
Acylation of D-Mannitol Assisted by PBA
[7]
These reactions followed a previously reported procedure,
employed d-mannitol (1.0 g, 5.5 mmol), PBA (1.33 g, 11.0 mmol), pyri-
dine(40 mL), benzene(50 mL), andacidchloride(12 mmol). Inthisway,
d-mannitol 1,6-didecanoate 17 (0.19 g, 7%) was obtained; the yield of
d-mannitol 1,6-di(phenyl)acetate 18 obtained, however, was 0%.
D-Mannitol 1,6-Dioctanoate 7
◦
This was obtained as a fine white powder (25 mg, 38%), mp 135–137 C
[23]
◦
(
lit.
132–136 C). δH [(CD3)2SO/D2O] 0.91 (6H, t, J 6.9, 2 CH3),
1
.28 (16H, br s, 2 (CH2)4CH3), 1.58 (4H, m, 2 CO2CH2CH2), 2.35 (4H,
Acknowledgments
t, J 7.3, 2 CO2CH2CH2), 3.42 (2H, d, J 8.9, 2 CH2CH(OH)CH(OH)),
.58 (2 H, ddd, J 2.4, 6.4, and 8.9, 2 CH2CH(OH)CH(OH)), 3.89 (2 H,
3
This worked was funded by the Australian Research
Council and Monash University. V.M. is a recipient of an
AustralianPostgraduateAward. NovoNordiskA/S, Denmark,
is acknowledged for its generous donation of Novozym
435, and Jessica Unthank is thanked for performing the
transesterification with 12 on a larger scale.
a
b
dd, J 6.0 and 11.9, 2 OCH H CH(OH)), 4.71 (2H, dd, J 2.1 and 11.4,
2
those previously reported.
a
b
OCH H CH(OH)). Other spectroscopic properties were identical to
[
7]
D-Mannitol 1,6-Di(3-methyl)butanoate 16
This was obtained as a fine white powder (6 mg, 11%) [repeated
with 1.5 mmol d-mannitol and 10.9 mmol 12 to give a yield of
◦
−1
2
2
23 mg (43%)], mp 149–151 C. vmax/cm (Nujol) 1093, 1302, 1716,
923, 3372. δH [(CD3)2SO/D2O] 0.95 (6H, d, J 6.9, 2 CH3), 2.04
References
(
(
2H, m, 2 CO2CH2CH), 2.23 (4H, d, J 7.3, 2 CO2CH2CH), 3.65
2H, d, J 8.9, 2 CH2CH(OH)CH(OH)), 4.02 (2H, ddd, J 2.4, 6.4,
[1] J. A. Arcos, M. Bernabe, C. Otero, Biotechnol. Bioeng.
1998, 60, 53. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19981005)60:1<
53::AID-BIT6>3.3.CO;2-W
[2] C. Morpain, M. Tisserand, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1979,
1379. doi:10.1039/P19790001379
and 8.9, 2 CH2CH(OH)CH(OH)), 4.37 (2H, dd, J 6.0 and 11.9, 2
OCH H CH(OH)), 4.85 (2H, dd, J 2.1 and 11.4, 2 OCH H CH(OH)).
δC [(CD3)2SO] 23.2, 26.1, 43.7, 67.8, 69.2, 70.1, 172.5. m/z 373.2
a
b
a
b
+
[
M + Na] .
[3] J. M. Brown, F. M. Dayrit, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2
1
987, 91.
D-Mannitol 1,6-Didecanoate 17
[4] (a) L. D. Boeck, M. M. Hoehn, T. H. Sands, R. W. Wetzel,
J. Antibiot. 1978, 31, 19.
◦
This was obtained as a fine white powder (28 mg, 40%), mp 102–106 C.
−1
(b) G. G. Marconi, B. B. Molloy, R. Nagarajan, J. W. Martin,
J. B. Deeter, J. L. Occolowitz, J. Antibiot. 1978, 31, 27.
vmax/cm (Nujol) 1078, 1172, 1292, 1747, 3327. δH [(CD3)2SO] 0.91
6H, t, J 6.9, 2 CH3), 1.28 (24H, br s, 2 (CH2)6CH3), 1.50–1.52 (4H,
m, 2 CO2CH2CH2), 2.35 (4H, t, J 8.5, 2 CO2CH2CH2), 3.55–3.65
4H, m, 4 CH2CH(OH)CH(OH)), 4.02 (2H, dd, J 2.0 and 11.4, 2
(
(
c) J. R. Turner, T. F. Butler, R. S. Gordee, A. L. Thakkar,
J. Antibiot. 1978, 31, 33.
(
a
b
a
b
[5] T. Maugard, M. Boulonne, B. Rejasse, M. D. Legoy, Biotechnol.
Lett. 2001, 23, 989. doi:10.1023/A:1010575309233
OCH H CH(OH)), 4.30 (2H, dd, J 2.0 and 9.0, 2 OCH H CH(OH)),
.38 (2H, d, J 7.9, 2 CH2CH(OH)CH(OH)), 4.85 (2H, d, J 6.1, 2
CH(OH)CH(OH)). δH [(CD3)2SO/D2O] 0.82 (6H, t, J 6.9, 2 CH3), 1.21
24H, m, 2 (CH2)6CH3), 1.48 (4H, m, 2 CO2CH2CH2), 2.26 (4H, t, J 7, 2
4
[
6] B. Wang, H.-Z. Ma, Q.-Z. Shi, Synth. Commun. 2002, 32, 1697.
doi:10.1081/SCC-120004263
[7] V. Bhaskar, P. J. Duggan, D. G. Humphrey, G. Y. Krippner,
(
a
b
CO2CH2CH2), 3.92 (2H, dd, J 11.4, 7.0, OCH H CH(OH)), 4.22 (2H,
a
b
V. McCarl, D. A. Offermann, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1
br d, J 11.0, 2 OCH H CH(OH)); signals for CH2CH(OH)CH(OH) and
CH2CH(OH)CH(OH) obscured by HOD/H2O. δC [(CD3)2SO] 14.9,
2
001, 1098. doi:10.1039/B009450L
[
8] P. Brigl, H. Gruner, Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1932, 65, 641.
2
2.9, 29.0, 29.1, 29.2, 29.3, 32.1, 34.4, 68.9, 69.8, 173.7. m/z 513.4
+
[9] J. M. Carr, S. P. Draffin, P. J. Duggan, G. D. Fallon,
D. G. Humphrey, Acta Crystallogr. 2001, E57, o1118.
[
M + Na] .
[
10] H.-H. Wust, J. Bardenhagen, U. Schollkopf, Liebigs Ann. Chem.
D-Mannitol 1,6-Di(phenyl)acetate 18
1
985, 1825.
◦
This was obtained as a fine white powder (16 mg, 26%), mp 151–153 C.
[
[
11] W. V. Dahlhoff, R. Koster, J. Org. Chem. 1976, 41, 2316.
12] P. J. Duggan, D. G. Humphrey, D. J. Price, E. M. Tyndall, Acta
Crystallogr. 2003, E59, o372.
−1
vmax/cm (Nujol) 696.4, 723.6, 842, 980, 1052, 1169, 1282, 1604.1,
1
9
4
759. δH [(CD3)2SO/D2O] 3.71 (4H, s, 2 PhCH2CO2), 3.79 (2H, d, J
.2, 2 CH2CH(OH)CH(OH)), 4.07 (2H, m, 2 CH2CH(OH)CH(OH)),
[
13] V. Bhaskar, A. D’Elia, P. J. Duggan, D. G. Humphrey,
G. Y. Krippner, T. T. Nhan, E. M. Tyndall, J. Carbohydr.
Chem. 2003, 22, 867. doi:10.1081/CAR-120026598
a
b
.38 (2H, dd, J 1.4 and 11.0, 2 OCH H CH(OH)), 4.45 (2H, dd, J 6.0
a
b
and 11.0, 2 OCH H CH(OH)), 7.39 (4H, dd, J 1.5 and 8.5, 2ArH), 7.48
(
4H, m, 2 ArH), 7.62 (2H, m, 2 ArH). δC [(CD3)2SO] 41.9, 68.7, 71.08,
[
14] Biotransformations in Organic Chemistry, 2nd edn (Ed. K. Faber)
+
7
1.13, 127.7, 129.3, 130.4, 139.3, 172.0. m/z 441.2 [M + Na] .
2
001 (Springer: Berlin).
[
[
15] A. M. Klibanov, Acc. Chem. Res. 1990, 23, 114.
16] I. Ikeda, A. M. Klibanov, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1993, 42, 788.
General Procedure for the Conventional Acid Chloride Method
d-Mannitol (1.0 g, 5.5 mmol) was heated in pyridine (8 mL) under an
inert atmosphere at 100 C for 15 min, after which time only about half of
[17] G. Youssef, S. Ransac, R. Verger, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1997,
1334, 6.
◦
the d-mannitol was observed to dissolve. The acid chloride (11.0 mmol)
was then added dropwise, with the reaction mixture becoming homo-
geneous once approximately half of the acid chloride had been added.
The reaction mixture was then stirred and heated at reflux for 5 h, and
then allowed to cool slowly to room temperature. The resulting reaction
mixture was added to H2SO4 (10%, 50 mL) and further H2SO4 was
added until a pH of 2 was attained. The reaction mixture was then left
to stand overnight, resulting in the precipitation of a fine white solid.
The precipitate was collected by vacuum filtration and then recrystal-
lized from ethanol to yield a white powder. In this way, d-mannitol
[18] G.-Y. Jeon, O.-J. Park, B.-K. Hur, J.-W. Yang, Biotechnol. Lett.
2001, 23, 929. doi:10.1023/A:1010598031929
[19] G. Kirchner, M. P. Scollar, A. M. Klibanov, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1985, 107, 7072.
[20] Y.-F. Wang, J. J. Lalonde, M. Momongan, D. E. Bergbreiter,
C.-H. Wong, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 7200.
[21] K. Takashi, T. Yoshimoto, A. Ajima, Y. Tamaura, Y. Inada,
Enzyme 1984, 32, 235.
[22] G. Carrea, S. Riva, F. Secundo, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1
1989, 1057. doi:10.1039/P19890001057
1
1
,6-didecanoate 17 (0.25 g, 9%) was obtained; the yield of d-mannitol
,6-di(phenyl)acetate 18 obtained, however, was 0%.
[23] E. Reinefeld, G. Klauenberg, Tenside 1968, 5, 266 [Chem. Abstr.
1969, 70, 11 929f].