VOLUME 68, NUMBER 13
J UNE 27, 2003
©
Copyright 2003 by the American Chemical Society
A New Cla ss of Ch ir a l Or ga n oger m a n es Der ived fr om
C
2
-Sym m etr ic Dith iols: Syn th esis, Ch a r a cter iza tion a n d
Ster eoselective F r ee Ra d ica l Rea ction s
,
‡
Giovanna Gualtieri,* Steven J . Geib,* and Dennis P. Curran*
Department of Chemistry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260
Received October 29, 2002
A new class of dithiostannanes and dithiogermanes have been prepared from 1,1′-binaphthyl-2,2′-
dithiol and 3,3′-bis(trimethylsilyl)-1,1′-binaphtho-2,2′-dithiol. While reduction of 4-butyl-4-chloro-
3
,5-dithia-4-stanna-cyclohepta[2,1-a;3,4-a′]dinaphthalene to the corresponding tin hydride was
unsuccessful, 4-tert-butyl-3,5-dithia-4-germa-cyclohepta[2,1-a;3,4-a′]dinaphthalene and 4-tert-butyl-
,6-bis(trimethylsilyl)-3,5-dithia-4-germa-cyclohepta[2,1-a;3,4-a′]dinaphthalene were obtained by
reduction of the parent germanium chlorides with NaBH and LiBH , respectively. Kinetic constants
2
4
4
for hydrogen transfer to a primary alkyl radical were measured for both germanium hydrides.
Reduction of R-halo carbonyl compounds by these germanium hydrides occurs with moderate ee
values (up to 42%), while hydrogermylation of methyl methacrylate occurs with low selectivity
(<3/1) for the former hydride but high selectivity (>10/1) for the latter.
In tr od u ction
center, in 1996 we introduced the first chiral tin hydride
4
derived from a C
2
-symmetric binaphthyl ligand. Since
Stereoselectivity in reactions of acyclic radicals is a
rapidly growing, yet still challenging field of radical
then, the groups of Metzger5 and Schiesser6 have syn-
2
thesized more chiral tin hydrides based either on a C -
1
chemistry. One way in which stereoselectivity can be
symmetric substituent or chiral ligands and proven that
they can indeed be used as stereoselective radical reduc-
ing agents (either alone or in conjunction with chiral
achieved is by use of chiral reagents that are analogues
of the popular tin hydride and, to a lesser extent, silicon
and germanium hydride reducing agents. Chiral, enan-
tiomerically pure, tin and germanium hydrides are
known,2 but to this date only a few of them have been
used for stereoselective free radical reactions.
7
6
Lewis acids) with high ee values (>90%).
We continued to elaborate on the C -symmetric derived
metal hydrides by exploring different patterns of substi-
tution in the C -symmetric ligand. We started by explor-
2
,3
2
To avoid possible racemization problems associated
with metal hydrides possessing an asymmetric metal
ing the replacement of metal-carbon bonds with metal-
sulfur bonds, and observing how this affects both the
stability and the reactivity of the resulting metal hy-
drides. This eventually led us to synthesize a new class
of chiral germanium hydrides as alternatives to the
traditional tin hydrides, and a preliminary report on
‡
Present address: Berlex Biosciences, 15049 San Pablo Avenue,
P.O. Box 4099, Richmond, CA 94804-4578.
1) (a) Sibi, M. P.; Porter, N. A. Acc. Chem. Res. 1999, 32, 163. (b)
(
Curran, D. P.; Porter, N. A.; Giese, B. Stereochemistry of Radical
Reactions; VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 1996. (c) Giese, B. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1989, 28, 969.
8
some of this work has appeared. We now report the
(
2) (a) Gielen, M. Top. Curr. Chem. 1982, 104, 57. (b) Vitale, C. A.;
(4) Nanni, D.; Curran, D. P. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1996, 7, 2417.
(5) (a) Schwarzkopf, K.; Blumenstein, M.; Hayen, A.; Metzger, J .
O. Eur. J . Org. Chem. 1998, 177. (b) Blumenstein, M.; Schwarzkopf,
K.; Metzger, J . O. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 235. (c)
Schwarzkopf, K.; Metzger, J . O.; Saak, W.; Pohl, S. Chem. Ber./ Recl.
1997, 130, 1539.
Podest a´ , J . C. J . Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1996, 2407 and references
therein. (c) Schumann, H.; Wassermann, B. C.; Pickardt, J . Organo-
metallics 1993, 12, 3051 and referenced cited therein. (d) Pratt, R. M.;
Thomas, E. J . J . Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1998, 727 and referenced
cited therein.
(
3) (a) Taoufik, M.; Santini, C. C.; Basset, J .-M. J . Organomet. Chem.
(6) (a) For a recent review see: Schiesser C. H. Aust. J . Chem. 2001,
54, 89. (b) Schiesser C. H. Aust. J . Chem. 2001, 54, 199. (c) Dakternieks,
D.; Dunn, K.; Perchyonok, V. T.; Schiesser, C. H. Chem. Commun.
1999, 1665.
(7) For a review of Lewis acids in radical reactions see: Renaud,
P.; Gerster, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 2563.
(8) Curran, D. P.; Gualtieri, G. Synlett 2001, SI, 1038.
1
999, 580, 128. (b) Colesdan, F.; Castel, A.; Rivi e` re, P.; Satg e´ , J .; Veith,
M.; Huch, V. J . Organomet. Chem. 1998, 17, 2222. (c) Tacke, R.; Kosub,
U.; Wagner, S. A.; Bertermann, R.; Schwarz, S.; Merget, S.; G u¨ nther,
K. Organometallics 1998, 17, 1687. (d) Eaborn, C.; Simpson, P.; Varma,
I. D. J . Chem. Soc. (A) 1966, 1133. (e) Brook, A. G.; Peddle, G. J . D. J .
Am. Chem. Soc. 1963, 85, 2338.
1
0.1021/jo026625s CCC: $25.00 © 2003 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 02/05/2003
J . Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 5013-5019
5013