Y. Tan et al. / Journal of Catalysis 364 (2018) 174–182
175
nitro group and the vinyl group were not competitively adsorbed
onto the surface of the Au25/ZnAl-HT catalyst, while only the for-
mer could be adsorbed and hydrogenated. However, the intrinsic
origin of the high chemoselectivity for this catalyst is not yet clear.
In order to gain deep insight into this question, in this work, we
tried to study the support effect on the catalytic performance of
gold for this reaction. Unlike the previous study on the support
effect for the chemoselective hydrogenation of functionalized
nitroaromatics over gold catalysts, we used three different hydro-
talcites (MAl-HT, M = Mg, Zn, Ni) with similar structures as support
precursors. We selected atomically precise thiolated Au25 NCs as
the precursor of gold to exclude the influence of the preparation
method on the formation of gold particles. The performance of
the three catalysts for the chemoselective hydrogenation of 3-
nitrostyrene was obviously different.
get a good signal/noise ratio, the loading of Au was increased to
10 wt% for characterization by energy-dispersive X-ray mapping
(EDS-mapping) and XAS.
For comparison, the Au/MAl-HT-300 catalysts were prepared by
the deposition–precipitation (DP) method. In a typical synthesis,
an aqueous solution of HAuCl4 (20 mM, 5 mL) was added to the
suspension solution under vigorous stirring, in which 2.00 g of
the hydrotalcite powder (MAl-HT) was included. Then 1 M of
NaOH solution was used to adjust the pH value to 10. The reaction
was allowed to proceed at room temperature for 12 h. Then a solid
was obtained after filtering, washing, and drying. Before the cat-
alytic test, the solids were calcined at 300 °C for 2 h, with a heating
rate of 5 °C/min.
2.2. Catalytic test
A series of characterizations were employed to explore the key
factors influencing the catalytic performances. High-angle annular
dark-field-scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-
STEM) was used to figure out the size distributions of the Au par-
ticles. CO2 temperature-programmed desorption (CO2 TPD) and
in situ DRIFTS of CO adsorption were utilized to test the surface
properties of the catalysts. The reaction routes were investigated
by in situ DRIFTS of 3-styrene adsorption at 10 bar of H2. The rea-
sons that led to the different catalytic performances of the three
catalysts were discussed based on the above results. This work will
be beneficial for understanding the origin of chemoselectivity and
activity over supported gold catalysts for this kind of reactions.
Catalytic testing of the chemoselective hydrogenation of 3-
nitrostyrene was carried out in a stainless steel autoclave equipped
with a pressure gauge under magnetic stirring. Before reaction, a
mixture of 3-nitrostyrene (0.2 M) and toluene and o-xylene (0.1
M) totaling 2 mL was put into the vessel. Then certain amounts
of catalysts were introduced into the autoclave. After sealing, the
autoclave was flushed with hydrogen six times and then pressur-
ized at 10 bar. To initiate the reaction, the reactor was heated to
90 °C in a water bath without stirring until the temperature
reached the specified value. After reaction, the product was con-
densed and analyzed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry.
The turnover frequency (TOF) was measured when the conversion
of the substrate was below 20% and calculated in consideration of
the total loading of gold [10,28–30] and also its dispersion [31].
2. Experiment
2.1. Preparation of the catalysts
2.3. Characterization
The Au25 NCs were prepared by a NaOH-mediated NaBH4 reduc-
tion method according to the previous work [21,28]. Typically, 5.0
mL of the aqueous solution of HAuCl4 (110 mM) and 150 mL of cys-
teine solution (5.5 mM) were successively added to 200 mL of
ultrapure water under stirring. Then 30 mL of 1 M NaOH solution
was introduced into the above mixture. After 15 min of stirring,
excessive sodium borohydride was added to the above solution,
followed by vigorous stirring for 3 h. Finally, the products were col-
lected and washed with ethanol–water (V/V = 3:1). The Au25 NCs
were then obtained by lyophilization. The UV–vis spectrum of
the Au25 NCs is shown in Fig. S1 in the Supplementary Information.
The MAl-HTs were prepared as follows. Solution A was obtained
by adding M(NO3)2Á6H2O (0.21 mol) and Al(NO3)3Á9H2O (0.07 mol)
to 200 mL of ultrapure water. Solution B was prepared by adding
NaOH (0.438 mol) and Na2CO3 (0.113 mol) to 200 mL of ultrapure
water. Then solution A was slowly pumped into solution B (3 mL/
min) under constant stirring in the water bath at 75 °C. The gel was
aged at 75 °C for 24 h and the solid obtained was filtered and
washed with water and ethanol until the pH value of the filtrate
became neutral. The precipitates were dried in an oven at 80 °C
overnight to obtain the MAl-HTs.
The supported Au25 NCs catalysts were prepared as follows.
Au25 NCs (30 mg) were dispersed into 10 mL of ultrapure water.
Then 2.00 g of the MAl-HT supports was added into the above sus-
pension under vigorous stirring. After 1 h, the product was washed
with ultrapure water and collected by centrifugation (8000 rpm, 6
min). The residue was then freeze- dried for 10 h. The obtained
samples were defined as Au25/MAl-HT. Before the catalytic test,
the precursors were calcined at 300 °C for 2 h, with a heating rate
of 5 °C/min, and were denoted as Au25/MAl-HT-300. The loadings
of Au in the Au25/MAl-HT-300 catalysts were determined by induc-
tively coupled plasma spectrometry (ICP-AES). They were 1.02,
0.96, and 1.06% when the M was Mg, Zn, and Ni, respectively. To
The actual Au loadings were measured with an ICP-AES on an
IRIS Intrepid II XSP instrument (Thermo Electron Corporation).
The UV–visible spectra were recorded on a Cintra (GBC) apparatus
with water as a reference at room temperature. The Au25 NCs were
dissolved in the water for measurement. A continuous mode was
used in the wavelength range from 190 to 900 nm at a scanning
speed of 100 nm minÀ1. The X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) pat-
terns were determined on a PW3040/60 X’Pert PRO (PANalytical)
diffractometer equipped with
a CuKa radiation source (k =
0.15432 nm) operating at 40 kV and 40 mA. The HAADF-STEM,
the high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM),
and the EDS mapping images were recorded on a JEOL JEM-
2100F microscope equipped with STEM dark-field (DF) and Oxford
detectors at 200 kV. CO2 TPD was conducted on a Micromeritics
AutoChem II 2920 automated catalyst characterization system.
The CO2 molecules were detected by an OmniStar mass spectrom-
eter (MS) equipped with the software quadstar 32-bit.
The in situ CO-DRIFTS spectra were acquired with a BRUKER
Equinox 55 spectrometer equipped with a MCT detector in the
range 400–4000 cmÀ1. An attenuated total reflection infrared
(ATR-IR) spectroscope was equipped with a DLaTGS detector and
the spectrum was acquired with a Bruker Vertex 70 V spectrome-
ter. The experiment was operated at room temperature and atmo-
spheric pressure. Before the test, the catalyst was dispersed into
10% of the ethanol/water and the mixture treated with ultrasound
for 30 min. Then the suspension was added dropwise onto the sur-
face of the diamond crystal on the instrument at a temperature of
90 °C. After drying, the background spectrum was recorded and the
substrate solution was added. To get the signal of the adsorbed
substrates, the spectrum was recorded when the liquid was
evaporated.
The in situ DRIFTS of nitrostyrene were recorded with a BRUKER
Equinox 55 spectrometer equipped with a MCT detector in the