SCHEME 1. Coupling of p-Nitroiodobenzene with Thiol
Catalyzed by Cu Nanoparticles
Highly Chemoselective Reduction of Aromatic
Nitro Compounds by Copper Nanoparticles/
Ammonium Formate
Amit Saha and Brindaban Ranu*
Department of Organic Chemistry, Indian Association for the
CultiVation of Science, JadaVpur, Kolkata 700 032, India
ReceiVed April 21, 2008
SCHEME 2. Reduction of Aromatic Nitro Compound to
Aniline
chemoselective reduction of aromatic nitro compounds by
copper nanoparticles in combination with ammonium formate
in ethylene glycol (Scheme 2).
A highly chemoselective reduction of aromatic nitro com-
pounds to the corresponding amino derivatives has been
achieved by a combination of copper nanoparticles and
ammonium formate in ethylene glycol at 120 °C. The
reductions are successfully carried out in presence of a wide
variety of other reducible functional groups in the molecule,
such as Cl, I, OCH2Ph, NHCH2Ph, COR, COOR, CN, etc.
The reactions are very clean and high yielding.
Aromatic amines are useful intermediates in the preparation
of dyes, pharmaceuticals, and agricultural chemicals and can
be easily obtained by the reduction of aromatic nitro compounds.
A variety of procedures involving metals and other reducing
agents are available for this purpose.4 However, the selective
reduction of a nitro group in the presence of other reducible
functionalities in a molecule is a challenging task. In addition,
reduction of aromatic nitro compounds often stops at an
intermediate stage, producing hydroxylamines, hydrazines, and
azoarenes as side products.4b Recently a few procedures
involving coinage metal nanoparticles (Au, Ag, Cu/aqueous
NaBH4),5a gold nanoparticles supported on TiO2 or Fe2O3/H2,5b
polymer-supported nanostructured platinum carbonyl cluster,5c
and carbon nanofiber-supported platinum and palladium
nanoparticles5d have been demonstrated for the reduction of nitro
group. However, an alternative efficient, simple, chemoselective,
and cost-effective procedure is highly appreciated.
The experimental procedure for our Cu nanoparticles-medi-
ated reduction is very simple. A mixture of an aromatic nitro
compound, Cu nanoparticles (size 4-6 nm as shown in Figure
1), and ammonium formate was heated at 120 °C in ethylene
glycol. The product was obtained following a standard workup.
A few other protic solvents such as methanol, ethanol, and water
were also investigated; however, none of them gave satisfactory
results.
The use of metal nanoparticles for organic reactions has
attracted tremendous interest in recent times.1,2 As a part of
our activities in this area we have demonstrated very efficient
uses of palladium nanoparticles for the coupling of Vic-
diiodoalkenes with conjugated alkenes,3a Tsuji-Trost reaction,3b
Hiyama coupling,3c and use of copper nanoparticles for aryl-
sulfur bond formation.3d While carrying out the aryl-sulfur bond
formation catalyzed by Cu nanoparticles (20 mol%), we
observed an interesting reduction of the nitro group to an amino
group in trace amount (5%) in the coupling of 4-nitroiodoben-
zene with 4-methylthiophenol (Scheme 1).3d We proposed that
copper hydride (CuH), generated in situ during the reaction, as
delineated in Scheme 1, was responsible for the reduction of
NO2 group. We then investigated the optimization of the reaction
conditions using a stoichiometric amount of Cu nanoparticles
and a convenient hydrogen source toward complete reduction
of the NO2 group. Ammonium formate was found to provide
the best results in terms of yields and reaction time compared
to other hydrogen sources such as hydrazine hydrate and H2
gas. This led us to report here a novel protocol for the
(4) (a) Tafesh, A. M.; Weiguny, J. Chem. ReV. 1996, 96, 2035–2052. (b)
Yu, C.; Liu, B.; Hu, L. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 919–924, and references therein.
(c) Mohapatra, S.; Sonavane, S. U.; Jayaram, R. V.; Selvam, P. Org. Lett. 2002,
4, 4297–4300. (d) Rahaim Jr, R. J; Maleczka, R. E, Jr Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 5087–
5090. (e) Liu, Y.; Lu, Y.; Prashad, M.; Repic, O.; Blacklock, T. J. AdV. Synth.
Catal. 2005, 347, 217–219. (f) Chandrasekhar, S.; Prakash, S. J.; Rao, C. L. J.
Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 2196–2199. (g) Shi, Q.; Lu, R.; Lu, L.; Fu, X.; Zhao, D.
AdV. Synth. Catal. 2007, 349, 1877–1881. (h) Mandal, P. K.; McMurray, J. S.
J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 6599–6601. (i) Chen, B.; Dingerdissen, U.; Krauter,
J. G. E.; Rotgerink, H. G. J. L.; Mobus, K.; Ostgard, D. J.; Panster, P.; Riermeier,
T. H.; Seebald, S.; Tacke, T.; Trauthwein, H. Appl. Catal., A 2005, 280, 17–46.
(5) (a) Pradhan, N.; Pal, A.; Pal, T. Langmuir 2001, 17, 1800–1802. (b)
Corma, A.; Serna, P. Science 2006, 313, 332–334. (c) Maity, P.; Basu, S.;
Bhaduri, S.; Lahiri, G. K. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2007, 349, 1955–1962. (d) Takasaki,
M.; Motoyama, Y.; Higashi, K.; Yoon, S.-H.; Mochida, I.; Nagashima, H. Org.
Lett. 2008, 10, 1601–1604.
(1) Astruc, D. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 46, 1884–1894.
(2) (a) Ornelas, C.; Mery, D.; Blais, J. C.; Cloutet, E.; Aranzaes, J. R.; Astruc,
D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 7399–7404. (b) Astruc, D.; Lu, F.; Aranzaes,
J. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 7852–7872.
(3) (a) Ranu, B. C.; Chattopadhyay, K. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 2409–2412. (b)
Ranu, B. C.; Chattopadhyay, K.; Adak, L. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 4595–4598. (c)
Ranu, B. C.; Dey, R.; Chattopadhyay, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 3430–
3432. (d) Ranu, B. C.; Saha, A.; Jana, R. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2007, 349, 2690–
2696.
10.1021/jo800863m CCC: $40.75
Published on Web 07/26/2008
2008 American Chemical Society
J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 6867–6870 6867